783 points by antfarm 1894 days ago | 248 comments on HN
| Moderate positive Editorial · v3.7· 2026-02-28 12:31:12
Summary Political Persecution & Right to Life Advocates
This CNN investigation documents the 2020 poisoning of Russian opposition leader Alexey Navalny, employing journalistic scrutiny to expose alleged state-sponsored violence and assassination attempt. Editorial content advocates for accountability and affirms rights to life and free expression. However, the hosting platform's extensive user tracking infrastructure and commercial ad system create structural tension—the article promoting freedom and protection operates within a system that surveils users for profit, undermining the privacy and autonomy rights the journalism implicitly defends.
If you haven't seen the full investigation released last week I'd strongly recommend you check it out, top notch investigative journalism. The video has English subtitles: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=smhi6jts97I
I'm constantly impressed and amazed at how brave that man is, and the other people in Russia who are opposing what seems to have become a totalitarian thug state.
I think one of the more interesting tidbits of the investigation is how they managed to find the agents that were following him using black-market mobile phone records from corrupt policemen. These were only available due to a law allowing police to have access to private data, and apparently pretty commonly used by jealous spouses to spy on their SO.
A glimpse of the future for those supporting these kinds of laws because they have nothing to hide.
EDIT: After watching / reading the article and also the comments about parallel construction, there is indeed an inordinate amount of information being just there for the taking.
The BBC did a documentary on this intelligence black market some time ago[0], which shows the magnitude of it. I can't really imagine how it's like living over there, think 4-chan-on-steroids levels of doxxing that can be unleashed by anyone with some petty cash.
BTW I also strongly recommend to check the investigation since it's amazing example of how state surveillance and weak privacy can end up playing against the state.
We all live in the world where telecoms spy on everyone's location and where travel information is accessible to unlimited number of people (it's super easy to get air travel info in western countries too). It's just funny how adding a bit of corruption can completely compromise state's own spy agency.
Confused about “Hi it’s CNN here, would you like to tell us about the attempted murder you were part of?” Then only realizing for the last contact that that approach may not work.
This guy is a complete badass. They've tried to kill him multiple times and then he turns around and bamboozles them into giving up all the details? Brilliant.
How did this toxins guy keep getting ahold of Navalny's underpants?
First he had to have access to them to put poison. Then he later got access to them again to scrub them clean of the poison. I guess Navalny has no security whatsoever where he stays?
1) A trained FSB operative completely fell for a convincing enough social engineer, armed with nothing but caller-id spoofing software. Even though he was extremely apprehensive in the beginning of the call, he was slowly "eased into" talking top-secret stuff on the non-secure phoneline. This was so incredible that his last words on the call were "I was shocked by your questions. Was this OK that we talked about this on a non-secure line?". That's crazy. What chance do normal people have against such a good social engineer?
2) The amount of pro-Putin commenters in this thread (mind that some of these comments are dead), claiming that this is a CIA false flag or some such.
I can't tell if the investigative journalism is that amazing, or if the FSB tradecraft is so embarrassingly bad.
If another world power was investigated over a potential assassination and had such lax control over civilian personal data, would it be as easy to derive the chain of command and movements of their agents?
Would the cover identities be so shoddily arranged as to use the surnames of their spouses to make them easier to remember?
Or is this unique to Russia and this particular organization of the FSB.
Similarly, regarding the ongoing Solarwind attack, what is the tradecraft of the folks involved in that mission. Not only their opsec but in their own personal coms? Will we see an independent investigation that reveals the calls and networks of the hackers?
It always amazes that some people have the balls to live like this and stand for something, whereas many of us here lead comparatively chickenshit lives centered around MRR, pageviews or "lessons learned" posts for some superfluous software service.
Navalny isn't alone in this; I get the same reaction when I hear about teenagers lying about their age to go to war, or activists spending decades in prison and continuing to fight as soon as they leave, or even Hannibal crossing the Alps. Independently of whether the overarching cause is rational or beneficial or not, these acts of living are almost completely alien to the sensibilities of a modern day worker in an industrialized attention economy.
I said it multiple times how ridiculous I find that so many people readily buy into these stories. But... I don't know now, this was pretty convincing, to be honest. Not really a "proof" of anything, of course — this guy could be anyone, and of course it is really weird how he didn't recognize Navalny's voice and talked about all this stuff over the insecure line... But I can believe that. I mean, if it was fake, it was some really impressive fake, with much better script and acting than anything I can now remember. My biggest issue was believing that people doing important stuff in FSS can really be useless idiots, and this was such a convincing portrayal of such an idiot that I'm starting to accept it.
Anyway, I'm looking forward to hear more of that story.
My understanding is that Russian secret services don't even try to hide it, it's probably something they are proud of and to be exposed to the nation to show the great power of zar Putin.
Any silovik worth his salt would refuse to discuss such a hot topic over an open line. Also, some people noticed their talk is not even close to how two professionals both working in the kontora would speak. And how come 'the spy' didn't recognize his target's voice and manner of speaking? How come he didn't cross check 'the assistant' with his boss?
Not to mention that Navalny having such information about FSB agents means he's got some suspicious connections. Wouldn't he go to jail for this when he's back to Russia?
Org charts with names and faces should accompany a far wider range of malfeasance. I get this is a nice, cute, morally unambiguous story against a state enemy so CNN can do this, but there are many environmental disasters and domestic political decisions that can be traced up and down the chain.
It would be great for things like DDT, the petroleum industry denying their own global warming studies, tobacco denying their own cancer studies.
Highly unlikely honestly. Right now the general infantilism in Russia make investigations and headlines quite meaningless (not _meaningless_ but they really don't do much in short term).
Youtube video will get huge amount of likes and views. But that's it.
May develop a bad case of defenestration. Kinda stunning how bad that guy's opsec was, but on the other hand Putin wants people to know he was behind the assassination, otherwise he wouldn't have used Novichok. So maybe those involved don't feel the need to be super cagey about it.
As I understand it that apartment visit happened after the call in question. This call happened last week before the release of the first investigation and they sat on it for a week before releasing
The solution would then be to make all phone records public to avoid the black market issue, and I know that my parents wouldn't find anything wrong with that.
The people who promote anti-privacy will be stuck there I think. You know, until something awful happens to them. I think this has turned into a cultural issue unfortunately, and once it's culture all reason, sensibility, and middleground is lost.
Fortunately it's still not a totalitarian state. It's just an authoritarian kleptocracy where due to rampaging corruption everyone can buy spy agency staff phone billing and banking data for few hundred dollars.
The second part of your question is answered in the video: police/FSB came to the hospital and snatched his clothes to do the cleanup.
The first part we'll never know, but he really has no security and it is known that he's always the only tenant of his hotel room. Might have come into his room in the morning and sprayed them with Novichok while he was showering.
Exercising my self judgement doesn't make me pro Putin, nor does it make me a conspiracy theorist when I wonder why the flu killed more people in France in one month (jan 2017) than COVID in 10 months.
I have a brain, I use it. Maybe sometimes I come to the wrong conclusion but at least I don't just regurgitate what the media feeds me.
So in this case I find strange that the super Russian spies never manage to kill anyone even when they use military grade chemical agents that are supposed to kill full cities (remember the Skripal case, this one was fishy as hell too).
This is not unexpected. In Obama’s memoir he mentioned that Chinese security services would send people to comb the rooms of every member of the American delegation right after they left their room in the morning. If state security services can do that to the US President and his advisors, I see no reason the Russians security can’t do that to someone like Navalny.
> A glimpse of the future for those supporting these kinds of laws because they have nothing to hide.
This has been the reality in China for a while now and the result has been... largely fine. eg: This Reuter's piece from 2018 where you could get a picture of anyone's face for $1USD and a copy of their phone records for 50c: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-dataprivacy/data-du...
Like, if you ask a representative sample of people living in China what they feel the top 10 pros and cons of living in China were, that all of their personal information is for sale for a few bucks would not make it onto many people's lists on either side, it doesn't really affect your day to day life.
There are a lot of theoretical privacy attacks that sound scarily creepy but privacy advocates tend to play up the hypothetical and not look at how empirically impactful such things end up being.
The amount of 'western' data that was leaked, stoled or plain lost is trully staggering. I would be surprised if you could not expose at least some operatives
Do you think geniuses work for those services? They are perma drunk simpletons that are no good for anything higher than beating up a person. Add the fear they harbor from their psycho superiors and if you push them right, they will fall that easy.
If Joe Biden called you up now and demanded to know about some work you did 3 years ago, yet claimed to be someone high up your chain of command and gave a fake name, would you fall for it?
I don't think you would... The voice alone would give it away. There's no way the leader of the opposition isn't famous enough to be recognisable on the phone...
They had people on him all the time. When you have full time coverage of the person and the authorities are on your side, it's only a matter of time when an opportunity opens when he is separated from his luggage and do the deed.
Not sure about that. A Russian guy who poisoned Litvinenko with radioactive polonium in London was then promoted to a member of state parliament: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrey_Lugovoy
> I think one of the more interesting tidbits of the investigation is how they managed to find the agents that were following him using black-market mobile phone records from corrupt policemen. These were only available due to a law allowing police to have access to private data, and apparently pretty commonly used by jealous spouses to spy on their SO.
> A glimpse of the future for those supporting these kinds of laws because they have nothing to hide.
I don't think that's necessarily true, because pervasive and tolerated corruption is required to get an end state like that. If a country has "[those] kinds of laws," but unlawful access is investigated and prosecuted, then the data will remain (more or less) restricted to police and government investigators.
So, even though you still have to worry about the police and government abusing the data, as well as certain powerful or connected people, you won't have to worry so much about stuff like your SO buying your phone records for $10.
The belligncat guy just did an interview and mentioned that some of the other guys immediately recognized Navalny's voice and hung up: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCGHepzBzUc
The one they got to talk was in the cleanup crew, so probably not as familiar with him.
As for the first one, I think the reason was that Navalny called him after the investigation and clearly showed at the beginning of the conversation that he knew a lot of secret things, including the surnames of the other agents, facts on when and where they were, etc. Probably, the FSB guy just couldn't believe that there was a chance that a person who doesn't work for the government could be so aware of the details of the operation.
There's a reason authoritarian regimes mostly represent failed states, with maybe a few exceptions. If your regime has a negative effect on education, healthcare, administrative roles, why would the security services remain cold-blooded professionals? There's negative selection at every part of this system.
I guess you haven't seen the full investigation released last week. I'd strongly recommend you check it out, it shows how much investigation they did before Navalny took action.
Investigative journalism into government poisoning exemplifies free press function; reporting on evidence disclosure affirms freedom of expression and right to information; content body unavailable prevents comprehensive assessment
FW Ratio: 44%
Observable Facts
Article title indicates investigation into alleged state crime
Investigative format involves seeking evidence from official sources
Publication by major international news organization signals editorial gatekeeping and journalistic standards
Ad infrastructure includes user tracking, behavioral monitoring, and targeting parameters
Inferences
Investigative approach affirms press accountability function
Evidence-seeking from spies/officials demonstrates press access to power structures
Extensive commercial tracking suggests editorial decisions influenced by ad revenue optimization
User privacy invasion embedded in editorial platform contradicts free expression principles
Tension between journalistic integrity and commercial incentive structures evident in platform architecture
+0.60
Article 3Life, Liberty, Security
Medium Advocacy
Editorial
+0.60
SETL
ND
Poisoning as assassination attempt directly engages right to life; reporting on this event affirms the right through investigation and documentation
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
Article title explicitly references 'poisoning'
Navalny case widely documented as alleged state-attempted murder
Investigation narrative positions victim survival as newsworthy human rights event
Inferences
Reporting on attempted murder inherently affirms victim's right to life
Investigation framing validates protection against extrajudicial state violence
Journalistic attention to case serves as implicit advocacy for right to life
+0.50
Article 2Non-Discrimination
Low Advocacy
Editorial
+0.50
SETL
ND
Investigation into poisoning of political opposition figure implies recognition of state-sponsored discrimination; content insufficient for full assessment
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
Title identifies victim as 'Alexey Navalny', known Russian opposition leader
Narrative focuses on investigation of alleged poisoning by state actors
Inferences
Reporting on alleged state persecution implicitly documents violation of equal protection
Investigation format suggests exposure of discriminatory targeting based on political activity
+0.30
PreamblePreamble
Low Advocacy Framing
Editorial
+0.30
SETL
+0.41
Article title invokes investigation into poisoning, implicitly affirming human dignity and protection from state violence; minimal body text provided limits full assessment
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
Page title: 'Alexey Navalny dupes Russian spy into revealing how he was poisoned'
Article published Dec 21, 2020 on CNN Europe section
Page contains multiple ad feedback forms and tracking markers
Inferences
Investigative framing implies commitment to exposing state-sponsored violence
Extensive ad tracking suggests editorial judgment may be influenced by commercial incentives
User data collection without explicit consent contradicts dignity-centered approach
ND
Article 1Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood
Insufficient content
ND
Article 4No Slavery
Insufficient content
ND
Article 5No Torture
Insufficient content
ND
Article 6Legal Personhood
Insufficient content
ND
Article 7Equality Before Law
Insufficient content
ND
Article 8Right to Remedy
Insufficient content
ND
Article 9No Arbitrary Detention
Insufficient content
ND
Article 10Fair Hearing
Insufficient content
ND
Article 11Presumption of Innocence
Insufficient content
ND
Article 12Privacy
Medium Practice
Insufficient content
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
Ad feedback modal visible with personal engagement tracking
Data URIs reference 'cms.cnn.com' tracking endpoints
User behavior data captured without apparent consent mechanism
Privacy expectations contradicted by invasive ad ecosystem
Commercial data collection prioritized over user privacy protection
ND
Article 13Freedom of Movement
Insufficient content
ND
Article 14Asylum
Insufficient content
ND
Article 15Nationality
Insufficient content
ND
Article 16Marriage & Family
Insufficient content
ND
Article 17Property
Insufficient content
ND
Article 18Freedom of Thought
Insufficient content
ND
Article 20Assembly & Association
Insufficient content
ND
Article 21Political Participation
Insufficient content
ND
Article 22Social Security
Insufficient content
ND
Article 23Work & Equal Pay
Insufficient content
ND
Article 24Rest & Leisure
Insufficient content
ND
Article 25Standard of Living
Insufficient content
ND
Article 26Education
Insufficient content
ND
Article 27Cultural Participation
Low Practice
Insufficient content
FW Ratio: 60%
Observable Facts
Page header contains extensive navigation with multiple section links
Ad feedback overlay positioned as modal blocking content access
Multiple nested navigation menus visible
Inferences
Commercial ad system creates friction in accessing published content
Navigation complexity reduces accessibility for users with cognitive or physical disabilities
ND
Article 28Social & International Order
Insufficient content
ND
Article 29Duties to Community
Insufficient content
ND
Article 30No Destruction of Rights
Insufficient content
Structural Channel
What the site does
-0.25
PreamblePreamble
Low Advocacy Framing
Structural
-0.25
Context Modifier
ND
SETL
+0.41
Site embeds article within commercial advertising and tracking infrastructure; privacy-invasive data collection undermines user autonomy and dignity
-0.35
Article 19Freedom of Expression
Medium Advocacy Framing Practice
Structural
-0.35
Context Modifier
ND
SETL
+0.81
Editorial independence undermined by extensive ad-tracking infrastructure; commercial data collection creates institutional conflicts of interest with journalistic integrity; user surveillance contradicts information freedom principles
ND
Article 1Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood
Not observable
ND
Article 2Non-Discrimination
Low Advocacy
Not assessed due to truncated content
ND
Article 3Life, Liberty, Security
Medium Advocacy
Not assessed
ND
Article 4No Slavery
Not observable
ND
Article 5No Torture
Not observable
ND
Article 6Legal Personhood
Not observable
ND
Article 7Equality Before Law
Not observable
ND
Article 8Right to Remedy
Not observable
ND
Article 9No Arbitrary Detention
Not observable
ND
Article 10Fair Hearing
Not observable
ND
Article 11Presumption of Innocence
Not observable
ND
Article 12Privacy
Medium Practice
Page implements surveillance tracking through ad feedback forms, data URIs, and tracking parameters without explicit privacy protection disclosure; user data collected for commercial targeting
ND
Article 13Freedom of Movement
Not observable
ND
Article 14Asylum
Not observable
ND
Article 15Nationality
Not observable
ND
Article 16Marriage & Family
Not observable
ND
Article 17Property
Not observable
ND
Article 18Freedom of Thought
Not observable
ND
Article 20Assembly & Association
Not observable
ND
Article 21Political Participation
Not observable
ND
Article 22Social Security
Not observable
ND
Article 23Work & Equal Pay
Not observable
ND
Article 24Rest & Leisure
Not observable
ND
Article 25Standard of Living
Not observable
ND
Article 26Education
Not observable
ND
Article 27Cultural Participation
Low Practice
Complex navigation structure and ad overlays create barriers to accessing cultural content; usability compromised by commercial ad system
ND
Article 28Social & International Order
Not observable
ND
Article 29Duties to Community
Not observable
ND
Article 30No Destruction of Rights
Not observable
Supplementary Signals
How this content communicates, beyond directional lean. Learn more
build b3ef88d+do1d · deployed 2026-02-28 14:37 UTC · evaluated 2026-02-28 14:40:58 UTC
Support HN HRCB
Each evaluation uses real API credits. HN HRCB runs on donations — no ads, no paywalls.
If you find it useful, please consider helping keep it running.