| |
Alpha This system is experimental. Scores and classifications are early-stage research and may be unreliable. Methodology → |
|
| Summary ~lite Elsevier steps up its War On Access
Lite evaluation by llama-4-scout-wai-psq · editorial channel only · no per-section breakdown available
| |
Longitudinal
· 4 evals | |
Audit Trail
8 entries | 2026-03-05 22:39 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.280 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 22:39 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) | | | 2026-03-05 22:32 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=-0.420 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 22:32 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq: -0.42 (Moderate negative) | | | 2026-03-02 10:49 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Strong positive (0.60) | - - | | 2026-03-02 10:49 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) | | | reasoning Editorial criticizing Elsevier's access restrictions | | 2026-03-02 10:45 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Moderate positive (0.50) | - - | | 2026-03-02 10:45 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.50 (Moderate positive) | | | reasoning ED implicitly supportive of access rights | | |
| |