| 2026-03-23 00:57 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.440 (3 dims) | - - |
| 2026-03-23 00:56 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| 2026-03-23 00:47 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.13) | - - |
| 2026-03-23 00:47 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |
| 2026-03-22 23:14 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.440 (3 dims) | - - |
| 2026-03-22 23:14 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| 2026-03-22 23:00 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.13) | - - |
| 2026-03-22 23:00 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |
| 2026-03-22 21:57 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.440 (3 dims) | - - |
| 2026-03-22 21:57 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| 2026-03-22 21:50 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.13) | - - |
| 2026-03-22 21:50 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |
| 2026-03-22 20:43 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.440 (3 dims) | - - |
| 2026-03-22 20:43 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| 2026-03-22 20:37 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.13) | - - |
| 2026-03-22 20:37 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |
| 2026-03-22 19:28 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.440 (3 dims) | - - |
| 2026-03-22 19:28 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| 2026-03-22 19:17 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.13) | - - |
| 2026-03-22 19:17 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |
| 2026-03-22 02:29 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.440 (3 dims) | - - |
| 2026-03-22 02:29 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| 2026-03-22 02:12 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.13) | - - |
| 2026-03-22 02:12 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |
| 2026-03-22 00:55 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.440 (3 dims) | - - |
| 2026-03-22 00:55 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| 2026-03-22 00:51 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.13) | - - |
| 2026-03-22 00:51 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |
| 2026-03-21 23:45 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.440 (3 dims) | - - |
| 2026-03-21 23:45 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| 2026-03-21 23:29 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.13) | - - |
| 2026-03-21 23:29 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |
| 2026-03-21 22:32 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.440 (3 dims) | - - |
| 2026-03-21 22:32 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| 2026-03-21 22:12 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.13) | - - |
| 2026-03-21 22:12 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |
| 2026-03-21 20:47 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.440 (3 dims) | - - |
| 2026-03-21 20:47 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| 2026-03-21 20:33 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.13) | - - |
| 2026-03-21 20:33 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |
| 2026-03-20 22:36 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| 2026-03-20 22:17 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |
| 2026-03-20 18:57 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| 2026-03-20 18:41 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |
| 2026-03-20 17:37 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |
| 2026-03-20 17:33 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| 2026-03-20 16:20 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |
| 2026-03-20 16:13 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| 2026-03-20 15:40 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |
| 2026-03-20 15:30 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| 2026-03-20 14:56 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |
| 2026-03-20 14:50 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| 2026-03-20 14:20 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |
| 2026-03-20 14:11 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| 2026-03-20 13:45 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |
| 2026-03-20 13:35 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| 2026-03-20 13:07 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |
| 2026-03-20 12:59 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| 2026-03-20 12:30 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |
| 2026-03-20 12:16 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| 2026-03-20 11:49 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |
| 2026-03-20 11:36 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| 2026-03-20 11:09 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |
| 2026-03-20 10:54 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| 2026-03-20 10:30 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |
| 2026-03-20 10:17 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| 2026-03-20 09:51 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |
| 2026-03-20 09:37 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| 2026-03-20 09:13 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |
| 2026-03-20 08:59 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| 2026-03-20 08:35 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |
| 2026-03-20 08:17 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| 2026-03-20 07:53 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |
| 2026-03-20 07:39 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| 2026-03-20 07:13 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |
| 2026-03-20 06:59 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| 2026-03-20 06:33 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |
| 2026-03-20 06:16 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| 2026-03-20 05:57 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |
| 2026-03-20 05:40 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| 2026-03-20 05:22 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |
| 2026-03-20 05:04 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| 2026-03-20 04:46 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |
| 2026-03-20 04:27 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| 2026-03-20 04:09 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |
| 2026-03-20 03:52 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| 2026-03-20 03:34 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |
| 2026-03-20 03:17 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| 2026-03-20 02:59 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |
| 2026-03-20 02:36 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| 2026-03-20 02:20 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |
| 2026-03-20 01:59 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| 2026-03-20 01:50 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |
| 2026-03-20 01:37 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| 2026-03-20 01:33 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |
| 2026-03-20 00:51 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| 2026-03-20 00:50 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) +0.00 | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |
| 2026-03-20 00:20 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq: +0.21 (Mild positive) | |
| 2026-03-20 00:16 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.09 (Neutral) | |
| reasoning Tech news with slight rights concern |
| 2026-03-19 23:33 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| 2026-03-19 23:32 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |
| 2026-03-19 22:54 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| 2026-03-19 22:53 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |
| 2026-03-19 21:42 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) 0.00 | |
| 2026-03-19 21:40 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) 0.00 | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |
| 2026-03-19 20:25 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) | |
| 2026-03-19 20:24 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.13 (Mild positive) | |
| reasoning The article discusses a security incident caused by a rogue AI agent at Meta, with no explicit human rights discussion. |