Model Comparison
Model Editorial Structural Class Conf SETL Theme
@cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct lite ND ND 0.83
@cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct lite +0.70 -0.20 Moderate positive 0.90 0.79 Reproductive Rights
Section @cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct lite @cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct lite Delta
Preamble ND ND
Article 1 ND ND
Article 2 ND ND
Article 3 ND ND
Article 4 ND ND
Article 5 ND ND
Article 6 ND ND
Article 7 ND ND
Article 8 ND ND
Article 9 ND ND
Article 10 ND ND
Article 11 ND ND
Article 12 ND ND
Article 13 ND ND
Article 14 ND ND
Article 15 ND ND
Article 16 ND ND
Article 17 ND ND
Article 18 ND ND
Article 19 ND ND
Article 20 ND ND
Article 21 ND ND
Article 22 ND ND
Article 23 ND ND
Article 24 ND ND
Article 25 ND ND
Article 26 ND ND
Article 27 ND ND
Article 28 ND ND
Article 29 ND ND
Article 30 ND ND
ND They Didn't Want to Have C-Sections. A Judge Would Decide How They Gave Birth (www.propublica.org)
9 points by hn_acker 6 days ago | 0 comments on HN ~lite vlite-2.0
Summary ~lite
Article discusses court-ordered C-sections in Florida, highlighting threats to women's autonomy.
Lite evaluation by llama-4-scout-wai-psq · editorial channel only · no per-section breakdown available
Longitudinal 16 HN snapshots · 2 evals
+1 0 −1 HN
Audit Trail 4 entries
2026-03-15 02:06 eval_success PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.050 (3 dims) - -
2026-03-15 02:06 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.05 (Neutral)
2026-03-15 02:04 eval_success Lite evaluated: Moderate positive (0.34) - -
2026-03-15 02:04 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.34 (Moderate positive)
reasoning
Investigative article on court-ordered C-sections, discussing reproductive rights and medical freedom