Model Comparison
Model Editorial Structural Class Conf SETL Theme
@cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct lite ND ND — 0.87 — —
@cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct lite 0.00 ND Neutral 1.00 0.00 Technology
claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 +0.42 +0.37 Moderate positive 0.12 0.11 Knowledge & Technology Access
@cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast lite ND ND — 0.80 — —
@cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast lite 0.00 ND Neutral 0.90 0.00 Technical Development
Section @cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct lite @cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct lite claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 @cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast lite @cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast lite
Preamble ND ND ND ND ND
Article 1 ND ND ND ND ND
Article 2 ND ND ND ND ND
Article 3 ND ND ND ND ND
Article 4 ND ND ND ND ND
Article 5 ND ND ND ND ND
Article 6 ND ND ND ND ND
Article 7 ND ND ND ND ND
Article 8 ND ND ND ND ND
Article 9 ND ND ND ND ND
Article 10 ND ND ND ND ND
Article 11 ND ND ND ND ND
Article 12 ND ND ND ND ND
Article 13 ND ND ND ND ND
Article 14 ND ND ND ND ND
Article 15 ND ND ND ND ND
Article 16 ND ND ND ND ND
Article 17 ND ND ND ND ND
Article 18 ND ND ND ND ND
Article 19 ND ND 0.91 ND ND
Article 20 ND ND ND ND ND
Article 21 ND ND ND ND ND
Article 22 ND ND ND ND ND
Article 23 ND ND 0.28 ND ND
Article 24 ND ND ND ND ND
Article 25 ND ND ND ND ND
Article 26 ND ND 0.61 ND ND
Article 27 ND ND 0.69 ND ND
Article 28 ND ND ND ND ND
Article 29 ND ND 0.16 ND ND
Article 30 ND ND ND ND ND
+0.42 SBCL Fibers – Lightweight Cooperative Threads (atgreen.github.io S:+0.37 )
147 points by anonzzzies 7 days ago | 35 comments on HN | Moderate positive Contested Low agreement (3 models) Editorial · v3.7 · 2026-03-15 22:33:46 0
Summary Knowledge & Technology Access Advocates
This technical blog post documents a new fiber concurrency system for SBCL, presenting original research in systems programming and algorithms. The content advocates strongly for freedom of expression and education through open, unrestricted publication of detailed technical knowledge, and demonstrates commitment to technological progress and participation. While not explicitly human rights-focused, the work's free distribution, pedagogical structure, and scientific contribution align positively with Articles 19, 26, and 27 of the UDHR.
Rights Tensions 1 pair
Art 19 ↔ Art 27 — Freedom to publish technical knowledge (Article 19) must be balanced with ensuring technological benefits are broadly shared (Article 27); the open-source model resolves this by enabling both.
Article Heatmap
Preamble: ND — Preamble Preamble: No Data — Preamble P Article 1: ND — Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood Article 1: No Data — Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood 1 Article 2: ND — Non-Discrimination Article 2: No Data — Non-Discrimination 2 Article 3: ND — Life, Liberty, Security Article 3: No Data — Life, Liberty, Security 3 Article 4: ND — No Slavery Article 4: No Data — No Slavery 4 Article 5: ND — No Torture Article 5: No Data — No Torture 5 Article 6: ND — Legal Personhood Article 6: No Data — Legal Personhood 6 Article 7: ND — Equality Before Law Article 7: No Data — Equality Before Law 7 Article 8: ND — Right to Remedy Article 8: No Data — Right to Remedy 8 Article 9: ND — No Arbitrary Detention Article 9: No Data — No Arbitrary Detention 9 Article 10: ND — Fair Hearing Article 10: No Data — Fair Hearing 10 Article 11: ND — Presumption of Innocence Article 11: No Data — Presumption of Innocence 11 Article 12: ND — Privacy Article 12: No Data — Privacy 12 Article 13: ND — Freedom of Movement Article 13: No Data — Freedom of Movement 13 Article 14: ND — Asylum Article 14: No Data — Asylum 14 Article 15: ND — Nationality Article 15: No Data — Nationality 15 Article 16: ND — Marriage & Family Article 16: No Data — Marriage & Family 16 Article 17: ND — Property Article 17: No Data — Property 17 Article 18: ND — Freedom of Thought Article 18: No Data — Freedom of Thought 18 Article 19: +0.91 — Freedom of Expression 19 Article 20: ND — Assembly & Association Article 20: No Data — Assembly & Association 20 Article 21: ND — Political Participation Article 21: No Data — Political Participation 21 Article 22: ND — Social Security Article 22: No Data — Social Security 22 Article 23: +0.28 — Work & Equal Pay 23 Article 24: ND — Rest & Leisure Article 24: No Data — Rest & Leisure 24 Article 25: ND — Standard of Living Article 25: No Data — Standard of Living 25 Article 26: +0.61 — Education 26 Article 27: +0.69 — Cultural Participation 27 Article 28: ND — Social & International Order Article 28: No Data — Social & International Order 28 Article 29: +0.16 — Duties to Community 29 Article 30: ND — No Destruction of Rights Article 30: No Data — No Destruction of Rights 30
Negative Neutral Positive No Data
Aggregates
E
+0.42
S
+0.37
Weighted Mean +0.59 Unweighted Mean +0.53
Max +0.91 Article 19 Min +0.16 Article 29
Signal 5 No Data 26
Volatility 0.27 (High)
Negative 0 Channels E: 0.6 S: 0.4
SETL ℹ +0.11 Editorial-dominant
FW Ratio ℹ 60% 24 facts · 16 inferences
Agreement Low 3 models · spread ±0.297
Evidence 11% coverage ℹ
1H 3M 4L 26 ND
Theme Radar
Foundation Security Legal Privacy & Movement Personal Expression Economic & Social Cultural Order & Duties Foundation: 0.00 (0 articles) Security: 0.00 (0 articles) Legal: 0.00 (0 articles) Privacy & Movement: 0.00 (0 articles) Personal: 0.00 (0 articles) Expression: 0.91 (1 articles) Economic & Social: 0.28 (1 articles) Cultural: 0.65 (2 articles) Order & Duties: 0.16 (1 articles)
HN Discussion 10 top-level · 12 replies
justinhj 2026-03-15 00:33 UTC link
They should be called Anthony Green Threads. Seriously though, great to see.
matthewfcarlson 2026-03-15 00:43 UTC link
I personally like the name fiber better than green threads. But everywhere I’ve worked in user space cooperative threads, it’s always been green threads.
HexDecOctBin 2026-03-15 02:59 UTC link
Is there a similar document for the memory arena feature? I tried searching the official documentation, but found scant references and no instructions on how and when to use it.
pestatije 2026-03-15 04:18 UTC link
SBCL - Steel Bank Common Lisp
nothrabannosir 2026-03-15 04:59 UTC link
I strongly recommend having a look at the mailing list to get some context:

https://sourceforge.net/p/sbcl/mailman/sbcl-devel/thread/CAF...

and

https://sourceforge.net/p/sbcl/mailman/sbcl-devel/thread/CAC...

This will certainly speak to some people taking part in some of the more controversial discussions taking place on HN recently, to put it mildly.

lukasb 2026-03-15 05:39 UTC link
Serious question - I thought LLMs were bad at balancing parentheses?
smallstepforman 2026-03-15 05:56 UTC link
256Kb stack per Fiber is still insane overhead compared to Actors. I guess if we survey programming community, I’d guesstimate that less than 2% of devs even know what the Actor model is, and an even smaller percentage have actually used it in production.

Any program that has at least one concurrent task that runs on a thread (naturally they’ll be more than one) is a perfect reason to switch to Actor programming model.

Even a simple print() function can see performance boost from running on a 2nd core. There is a lot of backround work to print text (parsing font metrics, indexing screen buffers, preparing scene graphs etc) and its really inefficient to block your main application while doing all this work while background cores sit idle. Yet most programmers dont know about this performance boost. Sad state of our education and the industry.

theParadox42 2026-03-15 06:21 UTC link
I really thought this was gonna be a sick material science paper. Still cool though
mark_l_watson 2026-03-15 13:18 UTC link
I am excited by the proposal and early work. SBCL Common Lisp is my second most used programming language - glad to see useful extensions. Most of my recent experiments with SBCL involve tooling to be called by LLMs/agents and high speed tooling to provide LLMs/agents with better long term memory and context. Fibers will be useful for most of that work.
nesarkvechnep 2026-03-15 20:28 UTC link
Every move in the concurrency direction is good but I really wanted to see preemptive scheduling and Erlang-like processes.
lll-o-lll 2026-03-15 03:40 UTC link
They are different things perhaps? Fibers imply strict cooperative behaviour; I have to explicitly “yield” to give the other fibers a go, green threads are just runtime managed threads?
anonzzzies 2026-03-15 05:21 UTC link
Hmm, must have missed that ; tried to find. There was a SBCL discussion a few days ago but didn't read much controversial things in that? I'm a fanboy though so possibly i'm blind to these things.
20k 2026-03-15 06:29 UTC link
Fibers are primarily when you have a problem which is easily expressible as thread-per-unit-of-work, but you want N > large. They can be useful for eg a job system as well, and in that case the primary advantage is the extremely low context switch time, as well as the manual yielding

There are lots of problems where I wouldn't recommend fibers though

atgreen 2026-03-15 06:41 UTC link
256k is just's just a placeholder for now. The default will get reduced as we get more experience with the draft implementation. The proposal isn't complete yet.
atgreen 2026-03-15 06:41 UTC link
They are much better these days.
my-next-account 2026-03-15 08:42 UTC link
Actors are a model, I have no clue why you're saying that there is a particular memory cost to them on real hardware. To me, you can implement actors using fibers and a postbox.

I've no idea what the majority of programmers know or do not know about, but async logging isn't unknown and is supported by libraries like Log4j.

dmpk2k 2026-03-15 09:26 UTC link
Huh, you're right.

Apparently it's still considered experimental (even though Google uses it in production) so it's not in the User Manual. There's this: https://github.com/sbcl/sbcl/blob/master/doc/internals-notes...

hrmtst93837 2026-03-15 11:31 UTC link
People fixate on stack size, but memory fragmentation is what bites as fiber counts grow, and actors dodge some of that at the cost of more message-passing overhead plus debugging hell once state gets hairy. Atomics or explicit channels cost cycles that never show up in naive benchmarks. If you need a million concurrent 'things' and they are not basically stateless, you're already in Erlang country, and the rest is wishful thinking.
beepbooptheory 2026-03-15 12:35 UTC link
Idk if I can quite place it but by the time it gets to, "I've created github issues for each section of your reviews.." in the second link its just so infuriating. Just want to shake them and say "for the love of god just talk to them"!
cmrdporcupine 2026-03-15 16:25 UTC link
I had some ideas for extending the lem editor (emacs in common lisp) the other day and I am barely literate in Lisp. So I had Claude Code do it.

Fully awesome. No problems. A few paren issues, buit it seemed to not really struggle really. It produced working code. Was also really good at analyzing the lem codebase as well.

I even had it write an agentic coding tool in Common Lisp using the RLM ideas: https://alexzhang13.github.io/blog/2025/rlm/

Lisp is a natural fit for this kind of thing. And it worked well.

(I also suspect if parens were really a problem... there's room here for MCP or other tooling to help. Basically paredit but for agents)

praptak 2026-03-15 17:47 UTC link
The stack size is just mmapp-ed address space. It only needs backing memory for the pages actually used by the stack.
jjtheblunt 2026-03-15 18:55 UTC link
what's your first most used programming language?
Editorial Channel
What the content says
+0.70
Article 19 Freedom of Expression
High Advocacy Practice
Editorial
+0.70
SETL
+0.26

Content actively demonstrates freedom of expression through detailed technical documentation and open sharing of ideas. Author publishes complete design specifications, implementation details, and API documentation without censorship or restriction.

+0.50
Article 26 Education
Medium Advocacy Practice
Editorial
+0.50
SETL
+0.22

Content directly supports education and knowledge development through detailed technical documentation, pedagogical design (table of contents, section structure, API reference), and educational intent. Document explicitly teaches concurrency concepts, algorithm design, and systems programming.

+0.40
Article 27 Cultural Participation
Medium Advocacy Practice
Editorial
+0.40
SETL
-0.22

Content addresses scientific and technological progress through original contribution to concurrent programming systems. Document presents new algorithmic designs (work-stealing deques, deadline scheduling, lock-free patterns) and enables technological participation.

+0.30
Article 23 Work & Equal Pay
Medium Framing
Editorial
+0.30
SETL
+0.12

Content addresses labor and employment indirectly through discussion of concurrency and computational efficiency. Fiber design explicitly motivates reducing computational waste and improving resource utilization, which relates to work conditions and fair compensation of computing resources.

+0.20
Article 29 Duties to Community
Low Practice
Editorial
+0.20
SETL
+0.14

Content implicitly recognizes duties through technical design goals prioritizing correctness and safety. Document emphasizes 'Correctness under GC' and 'Transparent integration,' reflecting responsibility to users and systems.

ND
Preamble Preamble
Low Practice

Preamble values (dignity, equality, freedom) not explicitly addressed in technical content.

ND
Article 1 Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood
Low Practice

Article 1 (equality of dignity and rights) not addressed in content.

ND
Article 2 Non-Discrimination
Low Practice

Non-discrimination not explicitly addressed.

ND
Article 3 Life, Liberty, Security

Right to life, liberty, and personal security not addressed in technical content.

ND
Article 4 No Slavery

Slavery and servitude not addressed.

ND
Article 5 No Torture

Torture and cruel treatment not addressed.

ND
Article 6 Legal Personhood

Right to legal personality not addressed.

ND
Article 7 Equality Before Law

Equality before law not addressed.

ND
Article 8 Right to Remedy

Right to legal remedy not addressed.

ND
Article 9 No Arbitrary Detention

Arbitrary arrest and detention not addressed.

ND
Article 10 Fair Hearing

Fair trial not addressed.

ND
Article 11 Presumption of Innocence

Presumption of innocence not addressed.

ND
Article 12 Privacy

Privacy not addressed.

ND
Article 13 Freedom of Movement

Freedom of movement not addressed.

ND
Article 14 Asylum

Right to asylum not addressed.

ND
Article 15 Nationality

Right to nationality not addressed.

ND
Article 16 Marriage & Family

Marriage and family not addressed.

ND
Article 17 Property

Property rights not addressed.

ND
Article 18 Freedom of Thought

Freedom of thought and conscience not addressed.

ND
Article 20 Assembly & Association

Freedom of assembly and association not addressed.

ND
Article 21 Political Participation

Political participation not addressed.

ND
Article 22 Social Security

Social security not addressed.

ND
Article 24 Rest & Leisure

Rest and leisure not addressed.

ND
Article 25 Standard of Living

Health and social security not addressed.

ND
Article 28 Social & International Order

Social and international order not addressed.

ND
Article 30 No Destruction of Rights

Prevention of rights destruction not addressed.
Structural Channel
What the site does
Element Modifier Affects Note
Legal & Terms
Privacy —
No observable privacy policy or data collection mechanisms on domain.
Terms of Service —
No terms of service detected on domain.
Identity & Mission
Mission —
Domain is a technical blog; no organizational mission statement present.
Editorial Code —
No editorial code of conduct detected.
Ownership —
Author identified as AT Green; no organizational ownership structure.
Access & Distribution
Access Model +0.25
Article 19 Article 27
Content freely accessible; no paywall, registration requirement, or geographic restriction detected. Supports open access principles.
Ad/Tracking —
No advertising or tracking mechanisms detected beyond basic analytics ID (HAPPENING_SITE_ID).
Accessibility +0.15
Article 26
Page uses semantic HTML, includes theme preferences, and provides structured navigation. No explicit accessibility statement, but markup supports assistive technology.
br_tracking +0.05
Preamble ¶5 Article 12 Article 19
No third-party trackers detected
br_security 0.00
Article 3 Article 12
Security headers: HTTPS, CSP
br_accessibility -0.05
Article 26 Article 27 ¶1
Accessibility: 100% alt text
br_consent 0.00
Article 12 Article 19 Article 20 ¶2
No cookie consent banner detected
+0.60
Article 19 Freedom of Expression
High Advocacy Practice
Structural
+0.60
Context Modifier
+0.25
SETL
+0.26

Structure supports freedom of expression: content freely accessible, no paywalls, no geographic restrictions, republishable via GitHub. Document marked as 'living document' with visible revision history, enabling transparent communication.

+0.50
Article 27 Cultural Participation
Medium Advocacy Practice
Structural
+0.50
Context Modifier
+0.25
SETL
-0.22

Open-source publication model (publicly available implementation on github.com/atgreen/sbcl) enables community participation in technological development and benefits sharing.

+0.40
Article 26 Education
Medium Advocacy Practice
Structural
+0.40
Context Modifier
+0.15
SETL
+0.22

Structure supports education: hierarchical organization, comprehensive indexing, code examples, terminology definitions. Accessible format (HTML, search-indexable) enables broad educational reach.

+0.25
Article 23 Work & Equal Pay
Medium Framing
Structural
+0.25
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.12

Open-source software model supports collaborative work and knowledge sharing as a form of labor right.

+0.10
Article 29 Duties to Community
Low Practice
Structural
+0.10
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.14

Design constraints reflect obligation to prevent harm: stack overflow detection, binding stack safety, GC consistency.

ND
Preamble Preamble
Low Practice

Open access structure and free distribution of knowledge aligns with universal access principles.

ND
Article 1 Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood
Low Practice

Open documentation structure treats all readers equally; no discrimination in access.

ND
Article 2 Non-Discrimination
Low Practice

No observable barriers to access based on protected characteristics.

ND
Article 3 Life, Liberty, Security

No structural implications for this right.

ND
Article 4 No Slavery

No structural implications.

ND
Article 5 No Torture

No structural implications.

ND
Article 6 Legal Personhood

No structural implications.

ND
Article 7 Equality Before Law

No structural implications.

ND
Article 8 Right to Remedy

No structural implications.

ND
Article 9 No Arbitrary Detention

No structural implications.

ND
Article 10 Fair Hearing

No structural implications.

ND
Article 11 Presumption of Innocence

No structural implications.

ND
Article 12 Privacy

No observable privacy protections or violations on technical blog.

ND
Article 13 Freedom of Movement

No structural implications.

ND
Article 14 Asylum

No structural implications.

ND
Article 15 Nationality

No structural implications.

ND
Article 16 Marriage & Family

No structural implications.

ND
Article 17 Property

No structural implications.

ND
Article 18 Freedom of Thought

No structural implications.

ND
Article 20 Assembly & Association

No structural implications.

ND
Article 21 Political Participation

No structural implications.

ND
Article 22 Social Security

No structural implications.

ND
Article 24 Rest & Leisure

No structural implications.

ND
Article 25 Standard of Living

No structural implications.

ND
Article 28 Social & International Order

No structural implications.

ND
Article 30 No Destruction of Rights

No structural implications.
Supplementary Signals
How this content communicates, beyond directional lean. Learn more
Epistemic Quality ℹ
How well-sourced and evidence-based is this content?
0.69 medium claims
Sources
0.6
Evidence
0.8
Uncertainty
0.7
Purpose
0.8
Propaganda Flags ℹ
No manipulative rhetoric detected
0 techniques detected
Emotional Tone ℹ
Emotional character: positive/negative, intensity, authority
measured
Valence
+0.3
Arousal
0.4
Dominance
0.5
Transparency ℹ
Does the content identify its author and disclose interests?
0.50
✓ Author
More signals: context, framing & audience
Solution Orientation ℹ
Does this content offer solutions or only describe problems?
0.68 solution oriented
Reader Agency
0.7
Stakeholder Voice ℹ
Whose perspectives are represented in this content?
0.40 2 perspectives
Speaks: institution
About: developersusers
Temporal Framing ℹ
Is this content looking backward, at the present, or forward?
prospective medium term
Geographic Scope ℹ
What geographic area does this content cover?
global
Linux, macOS, Windows
Complexity ℹ
How accessible is this content to a general audience?
technical high jargon domain specific
Longitudinal 485 HN snapshots · 69 evals
+1 0 −1 HN
Audit Trail 89 entries
2026-03-16 00:42 eval_success PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.120 (3 dims) - -
2026-03-16 00:42 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-15 23:22 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - -
2026-03-15 23:22 model_divergence Cross-model spread 0.59 exceeds threshold (2 models) - -
2026-03-15 23:22 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical article on SBCL fibers, no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-15 23:22 rater_validation_warn Lite validation warnings for model llama-4-scout-wai: 1W 0R - -
2026-03-15 22:33 eval_success Evaluated: Moderate positive (0.59) - -
2026-03-15 22:33 eval Evaluated by claude-haiku-4-5-20251001: +0.59 (Moderate positive) 15,254 tokens
2026-03-15 22:33 rater_validation_warn Validation warnings for model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001: 0W 3R - -
2026-03-15 21:51 eval_success PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.120 (3 dims) - -
2026-03-15 21:51 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-15 21:21 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - -
2026-03-15 21:21 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical article on SBCL fibers, no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-15 21:21 rater_validation_warn Lite validation warnings for model llama-4-scout-wai: 1W 0R - -
2026-03-15 21:10 eval_success PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.120 (3 dims) - -
2026-03-15 21:10 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-15 20:41 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - -
2026-03-15 20:41 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical article on SBCL fibers, no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-15 20:41 rater_validation_warn Lite validation warnings for model llama-4-scout-wai: 1W 0R - -
2026-03-15 20:33 eval_success PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.120 (3 dims) - -
2026-03-15 20:33 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-15 20:06 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - -
2026-03-15 20:06 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical article on SBCL fibers, no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-15 20:06 rater_validation_warn Lite validation warnings for model llama-4-scout-wai: 1W 0R - -
2026-03-15 19:55 eval_success PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.120 (3 dims) - -
2026-03-15 19:55 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-15 19:31 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - -
2026-03-15 19:31 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical article on SBCL fibers, no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-15 19:31 rater_validation_warn Lite validation warnings for model llama-4-scout-wai: 1W 0R - -
2026-03-15 19:18 eval_success PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.120 (3 dims) - -
2026-03-15 19:18 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-15 18:56 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - -
2026-03-15 18:56 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical article on SBCL fibers, no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-15 18:35 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-15 18:04 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical article on SBCL fibers, no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-15 17:24 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-15 16:56 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical article on SBCL fibers, no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-15 16:10 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-15 15:49 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical article on SBCL fibers, no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-15 15:34 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-15 15:11 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical article on SBCL fibers, no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-15 14:57 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-15 14:36 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical article on SBCL fibers, no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-15 14:21 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-15 13:57 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical article on SBCL fibers, no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-15 13:41 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-15 13:21 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical article on SBCL fibers, no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-15 13:03 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-15 12:42 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical article on SBCL fibers, no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-15 12:22 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-15 12:04 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical article on SBCL fibers, no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-15 11:42 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-15 11:27 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical article on SBCL fibers, no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-15 11:01 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-15 10:45 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical article on SBCL fibers, no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-15 10:22 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-15 10:06 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical article on SBCL fibers, no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-15 09:38 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-15 09:26 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical article on SBCL fibers, no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-15 08:56 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-15 08:44 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical article on SBCL fibers, no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-15 08:15 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-15 08:04 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical article on SBCL fibers, no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-15 07:30 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-15 07:21 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical article on SBCL fibers, no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-15 06:52 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-15 06:45 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical article on SBCL fibers, no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-15 06:17 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-15 06:10 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical article on SBCL fibers, no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-15 05:42 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-15 05:34 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical article on SBCL fibers, no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-15 05:07 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-15 04:59 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical article on SBCL fibers, no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-15 04:32 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-15 04:24 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical article on SBCL fibers, no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-15 03:55 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-15 03:49 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical article on SBCL fibers, no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-15 03:16 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-15 03:12 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical article on SBCL fibers, no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-15 02:39 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-15 02:37 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical article on SBCL fibers, no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-15 02:02 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-15 02:01 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical article on SBCL fibers, no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-15 01:26 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-15 01:26 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Technical article on SBCL fibers, no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-15 01:02 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive)
2026-03-15 01:02 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral)
reasoning
Technical article on SBCL fibers, no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-15 00:36 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq: +0.60 (Strong positive)
2026-03-15 00:36 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0.00 (Neutral)
reasoning
Technical content, zero rights discussion