+0.15 How many options fit into a boolean?

Name: HRCB Evaluation: How many options fit into a boolean?
Item: How many options fit into a boolean?
Rating: 0.09
Author: Human Rights Observatory

Alpha This system is experimental. Scores and classifications are early-stage research and may be unreliable. Methodology →

Model: @cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct lite ND @cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct lite 0.00 claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 +0.15 @cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast lite ND @cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast lite 0.00 Compare

Model Comparison

Model	Editorial	Structural	Class	Conf	SETL	Theme
@cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct lite	ND	ND	—	0.83	—	—
@cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct lite	0.00	ND	Neutral	1.00	0.00	Technical Discussion
claude-haiku-4-5-20251001	+0.15	0.00	Neutral	0.04	0.15	Free Expression & Knowledge Sharing
@cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast lite	ND	ND	—	0.80	—	—
@cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast lite	0.00	-0.60	Mild negative	0.90	0.60	Technical discussion

Section	@cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct lite	@cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct lite	claude-haiku-4-5-20251001	@cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast lite	@cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast lite
Preamble	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
Article 1	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
Article 2	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
Article 3	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
Article 4	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
Article 5	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
Article 6	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
Article 7	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
Article 8	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
Article 9	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
Article 10	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
Article 11	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
Article 12	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
Article 13	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
Article 14	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
Article 15	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
Article 16	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
Article 17	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
Article 18	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
Article 19	ND	ND	0.06	ND	ND
Article 20	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
Article 21	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
Article 22	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
Article 23	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
Article 24	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
Article 25	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
Article 26	ND	ND	0.12	ND	ND
Article 27	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
Article 28	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
Article 29	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
Article 30	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND

+0.15	How many options fit into a boolean? (herecomesthemoon.net S:0.00 )
	52 points by luu 15 days ago \| 29 comments on HN \| Neutral Moderate agreement (3 models) Editorial · v3.7 · 2026-03-16 01:33:43 0

Summary Free Expression & Knowledge Sharing Acknowledges

This personal technical blog post discusses Rust memory layout through a one-page article contribution to Paged Out! magazine, with extended personal reflections on relocation and writing. The content engages modestly with Article 19 (freedom of expression) by exemplifying open technical discourse and inviting community contribution, and with Article 26 (education) by sharing technical knowledge freely. Overall, the content neither champions nor undermines human rights; it operates orthogonal to the UDHR framework.

Article Heatmap

Negative Neutral Positive No Data

Aggregates

+0.15

0.00

Weighted Mean	+0.09	Unweighted Mean	+0.09
Max	+0.12 Article 26	Min	+0.06 Article 19
Signal	2	No Data	29
Volatility	0.03 (Low)
Negative	0	Channels	E: 0.6 S: 0.4
SETL ℹ	+0.15	Editorial-dominant
FW Ratio ℹ	56%	5 facts · 4 inferences
Agreement	Moderate	3 models · spread ±0.165

Evidence 4% coverage ℹ

  2M   29 ND 

Theme Radar

HN Discussion 10 top-level · 9 replies

pavon 2026-03-10 16:28 UTC link

Neat. Even knowing about niche optimization I would have guessed that you could fit 7 Options - one bit for each. But the developers were smart enough to take advantage of the fact that you can't have a Some nested below a None, so you only need to represent how many Somes there are before you reach None (or the data), allowing 254 possibilities.

mock-possum 2026-03-10 16:29 UTC link

> looking at Rust … it turns out that `Option<bool>` takes up exactly one byte of memory, the same as bool! The same is true for `Option<Option<bool>>`, all the way up to 254 nested options.

Ah how many of those options fit into that boolean. Word games!

nine_k 2026-03-10 16:29 UTC link

The scoop: a boolean can't be smaller than a byte. Full 254 level of nested Option<bool> fit into it. (C++ needs much more for even a single level.)

RobotToaster 2026-03-10 17:19 UTC link

>and that it takes up one byte of memory

You can make them smaller using bitfields in C.

shagie 2026-03-10 17:29 UTC link

For Java developers... you can use Optional<Boolean> to store the elusive four possible booleans.

ralferoo 2026-03-10 17:37 UTC link

True | False | FileNotFound was a meme about 2 decades ago, and even that was a reference to MSDOS from another 2 decades earlier. I guess things never change, only the language.

Even now, I still find myself using true/false/null on occasions, but I'm usually smart enough to replace it with an enum at that point. The only time I don't is when it's an optional parameter to a function to override some default/existing value, at which point it then makes sense to keep it as an optional bool.

vadelfe 2026-03-10 17:56 UTC link

The deeper you go into memory layout, the more you realize that even "simple" types aren't that simple.

gizmo686 2026-03-10 18:03 UTC link

It's not clear from the article, but "niche optimization" does not mean "optimization that is only useful in a very specific circumstance".

It is a specific optimization based on the idea of storing one type inside of another type by finding a "niche" of unused bit pattern(s) inside the second type.

It has far more useful application than a tower of Option 254 deep.

gima 2026-03-10 19:37 UTC link

"How many options fit into a boolean?" Five or two, according* to Microsoft.

> MsoTrioState is "a tri-state Boolean value". it has five possible values. only two of them are supported.

*) https://learn.microsoft.com/en-au/dotnet/api/microsoft.offic...

Sourced from here https://fedi.lynnesbian.space/@lynnesbian/115969259564305759

johnthescott 2026-03-11 04:56 UTC link

a two bit, boolish data type used for simple replies from a network: true, false, null and waiting. called a "rummy".

russdill 2026-03-10 17:32 UTC link

Um, no. Please show me how you can fit 255 possible states in something smaller than a byte by using bitfields.

AlotOfReading 2026-03-10 17:37 UTC link

The object it's inside will still take up at least one byte.

    sizeof(struct {bool a:1;}) == sizeof(char);

gizmo686 2026-03-10 17:42 UTC link

I'm surprised that trinary logic has not become a standard part of standard libraries yet. Almost every project I have worked on ends up with some form of a yes/no/maybe abstraction.

hinkley 2026-03-10 17:43 UTC link

I did a govt contract early on and learned that yes/no/unanswered/unasked was a common quad. I see that in disclosures when applying for jobs as well.

gizmo686 2026-03-10 17:56 UTC link

I doubt they were thinking about Option<bool> when making niches work like this.

Option<NonZeroU32> seems like a much more reasonable to justify this with. Also, enums can easily have invalid bit patterns that are unused without there being any specific bit that is always available. All you need is a single variant of the enum to have a free bit, and you have a niche to shove None into.

nitnelave 2026-03-10 18:45 UTC link

5, no? Null, Optional::empty, Optional(null), Optional(true), Optional(false)

rf15 2026-03-10 20:01 UTC link

Funnily enough that was also my first idea upon reading the headline.

So let's remember: some programmer, somewhere, is right now thinking about building a tri-state boolean because they think it fits their current problem perfectly fine. And they are always wrong.

nine_k 2026-03-10 22:45 UTC link

This just means that the problem requires more than a Boolean, but rather something like boolean | error. In many languages from the OOP heyday that alternative part was expressed via throwing an exception.

xen0 2026-03-11 09:58 UTC link

That is... amazing.

I think my favourite part is the fact that '1' isn't even one of the supported values.

Editorial Channel

What the content says

+0.20

Article 26 Education

Medium A: Advocacy for technical education and knowledge sharing

Editorial

+0.20

SETL

+0.20

Content implicitly values education through detailed technical exposition and encourages learning via open technical writing. Author shares knowledge of Rust, memory layouts, and compiler internals with general audience.

+0.10

Article 19 Freedom of Expression

Medium A: Advocacy for open expression and technical contribution

Editorial

+0.10

SETL

+0.10

Content exemplifies and encourages free expression through personal writing and open contribution to collaborative magazines. Author explicitly invites readers to contribute and share work without apparent restrictions.

Preamble Preamble

Content does not engage with universal dignity, equal and inalienable rights, or human freedom.

Article 1 Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood

No discussion of equal dignity or inalienable rights.

Article 2 Non-Discrimination

No engagement with non-discrimination principles.

Article 3 Life, Liberty, Security

No discussion of right to life, liberty, or personal security.

Article 4 No Slavery

No engagement with slavery or servitude.

Article 5 No Torture

No discussion of torture or cruel treatment.

Article 6 Legal Personhood

No engagement with legal personality or recognition before the law.

Article 7 Equality Before Law

No discussion of equal protection before the law.

Article 8 Right to Remedy

No engagement with remedy for rights violation.

Article 9 No Arbitrary Detention

No discussion of arbitrary arrest or detention.

Article 10 Fair Hearing

No engagement with fair trial or due process.

Article 11 Presumption of Innocence

No discussion of presumption of innocence or retroactive liability.

Article 12 Privacy

No engagement with privacy.

Article 13 Freedom of Movement

No discussion of freedom of movement or residency.

Article 14 Asylum

No engagement with right to asylum.

Article 15 Nationality

No discussion of nationality.

Article 16 Marriage & Family

No engagement with marriage or family rights.

Article 17 Property

No discussion of property rights.

Article 18 Freedom of Thought

No engagement with freedom of thought, conscience, or religion.

Article 20 Assembly & Association

No engagement with freedom of assembly or association.

Article 21 Political Participation

No discussion of political participation or public affairs.

Article 22 Social Security

No engagement with social security or welfare.

Article 23 Work & Equal Pay

No discussion of work, employment, or fair wages.

Article 24 Rest & Leisure

No engagement with rest, leisure, or reasonable working hours.

Article 25 Standard of Living

No discussion of food, clothing, housing, medical care, or social services.

Article 27 Cultural Participation

No engagement with cultural participation or intellectual property.

Article 28 Social & International Order

No discussion of social and international order for rights realization.

Article 29 Duties to Community

No engagement with duties to community.

Article 30 No Destruction of Rights

No discussion of limitations on UDHR rights.

Structural Channel

What the site does

Domain Context Profile

Element	Modifier	Affects	Note
Legal & Terms
Privacy	—		No privacy policy or cookie disclosure observed on-domain.
Terms of Service	—		No terms of service observed on-domain.
Identity & Mission
Mission	—		Personal blog; no formal mission statement observed.
Editorial Code	—		No editorial guidelines or code of conduct observed.
Ownership	—		Author identified as individual contributor; ownership structure clear.
Access & Distribution
Access Model	—		Content freely accessible; no paywall or subscription model.
Ad/Tracking	—		No visible advertising or tracking mechanisms observed on-domain.
Accessibility	—		PDF embeds and technical content may present accessibility challenges; no alt text strategy visible.
br_tracking	+0.05	Preamble ¶5 Article 12 Article 19	No third-party trackers detected
br_security	-0.05	Article 3 Article 12	Security headers: HTTPS
br_accessibility	0.00	Article 26 Article 27 ¶1	Accessibility: lang attr
br_consent	0.00	Article 12 Article 19 Article 20 ¶2	No cookie consent banner detected

0.00

Article 19 Freedom of Expression

Medium A: Advocacy for open expression and technical contribution

Structural

0.00

Context Modifier

0.00

SETL

+0.10

Blog platform permits unrestricted article publication; no visible content moderation or editorial gatekeeping beyond the voluntary Paged Out! submission process.

0.00

Article 26 Education

Medium A: Advocacy for technical education and knowledge sharing

Structural

0.00

Context Modifier

0.00

SETL

+0.20

Blog provides free access to educational technical content; no paywalls or enrollment barriers observed.

Preamble Preamble

No structural elements related to human rights principles.

Article 1 Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood

No structural elements addressing equal treatment or dignity.

Article 2 Non-Discrimination

No structural mechanisms that restrict access based on protected characteristics.

Article 3 Life, Liberty, Security

No structural elements bearing on personal security or bodily integrity.

Article 4 No Slavery

No structural elements related to forced labor or servitude.

Article 5 No Torture

No structural elements bearing on harmful treatment.

Article 6 Legal Personhood

No structural elements addressing legal recognition.

Article 7 Equality Before Law

No structural elements restricting legal equality.

Article 8 Right to Remedy

No structural mechanisms for seeking remedy visible.

Article 9 No Arbitrary Detention

No structural elements bearing on detention.

Article 10 Fair Hearing

No structural elements restricting fair treatment.

Article 11 Presumption of Innocence

No structural elements bearing on criminal liability.

Article 12 Privacy

No structural elements protecting or infringing on privacy.

Article 13 Freedom of Movement

No structural elements restricting movement or residence.

Article 14 Asylum

No structural elements bearing on asylum or persecution.

Article 15 Nationality

No structural elements bearing on nationality.

Article 16 Marriage & Family

No structural elements affecting family or marriage.

Article 17 Property

No structural elements bearing on property.

Article 18 Freedom of Thought

No structural elements restricting conscience or belief.

Article 20 Assembly & Association

No structural elements restricting assembly or association.

Article 21 Political Participation

No structural elements enabling or restricting political participation.

Article 22 Social Security

No structural elements bearing on social support.

Article 23 Work & Equal Pay

No structural elements bearing on labor conditions or employment.

Article 24 Rest & Leisure

No structural elements affecting work-life balance.

Article 25 Standard of Living

No structural elements bearing on welfare provision.

Article 27 Cultural Participation

No structural elements bearing on cultural rights or IP.

Article 28 Social & International Order

No structural elements addressing systemic rights enablement.

Article 29 Duties to Community

No structural elements enforcing community duties.

Article 30 No Destruction of Rights

No structural elements imposing restrictions beyond site functionality.

Supplementary Signals

How this content communicates, beyond directional lean. Learn more

Epistemic Quality ℹ

How well-sourced and evidence-based is this content?

0.72 low claims

Sources		0.7
Evidence		0.7
Uncertainty		0.8
Purpose		0.8

Propaganda Flags ℹ

No manipulative rhetoric detected

0 techniques detected

Emotional Tone ℹ

Emotional character: positive/negative, intensity, authority

measured

Valence		+0.5
Arousal		0.3
Dominance		0.4

Transparency ℹ

Does the content identify its author and disclose interests?

0.50

✓ Author

More signals: context, framing & audience

Solution Orientation ℹ

Does this content offer solutions or only describe problems?

0.56 mixed

Reader Agency

0.6

Stakeholder Voice ℹ

Whose perspectives are represented in this content?

0.45 2 perspectives

Speaks: individuals

About: communityindividuals

Temporal Framing ℹ

Is this content looking backward, at the present, or forward?

mixed short term

Geographic Scope ℹ

What geographic area does this content cover?

regional

Central Europe, Seattle, Germany, Warsaw, Poland

Complexity ℹ

How accessible is this content to a general audience?

moderate medium jargon domain specific

Longitudinal 219 HN snapshots · 88 evals

Audit Trail 108 entries

2026-03-16 04:07	eval_success	PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.120 (3 dims)	- -
2026-03-16 04:07	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-16 04:07	eval_success	Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00)	- -
2026-03-16 04:07	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-16 04:07	rater_validation_warn	Lite validation warnings for model llama-4-scout-wai: 1W 0R	- -
2026-03-16 01:33	eval_success	Evaluated: Neutral (0.09)	- -
2026-03-16 01:33	eval	Evaluated by claude-haiku-4-5-20251001: +0.09 (Neutral) 12,347 tokens
2026-03-11 22:16	eval_success	Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00)	- -
2026-03-11 22:16	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-11 22:16	rater_validation_warn	Lite validation warnings for model llama-4-scout-wai: 1W 0R	- -
2026-03-11 21:22	eval_success	PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.120 (3 dims)	- -
2026-03-11 21:22	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) -0.16
2026-03-11 20:53	eval_success	Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00)	- -
2026-03-11 20:53	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-11 20:53	rater_validation_warn	Lite validation warnings for model llama-4-scout-wai: 1W 0R	- -
2026-03-11 19:53	eval_success	PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.280 (3 dims)	- -
2026-03-11 19:53	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) +0.16
2026-03-11 19:29	eval_success	Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00)	- -
2026-03-11 19:29	rater_validation_warn	Lite validation warnings for model llama-4-scout-wai: 1W 0R	- -
2026-03-11 19:29	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-11 18:41	eval_success	PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.120 (3 dims)	- -
2026-03-11 18:41	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) -0.16
2026-03-11 18:17	eval_success	Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00)	- -
2026-03-11 18:17	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-11 18:17	rater_validation_warn	Lite validation warnings for model llama-4-scout-wai: 1W 0R	- -
2026-03-11 17:26	eval_success	PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.280 (3 dims)	- -
2026-03-11 17:26	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-11 17:02	eval_success	Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00)	- -
2026-03-11 17:02	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-11 17:02	rater_validation_warn	Lite validation warnings for model llama-4-scout-wai: 1W 0R	- -
2026-03-11 15:54	eval_success	PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.280 (3 dims)	- -
2026-03-11 15:54	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-11 15:51	eval_success	Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00)	- -
2026-03-11 15:51	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-11 14:26	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-11 14:24	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-11 13:15	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-11 13:14	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-11 12:37	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-11 12:35	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-11 11:57	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-11 11:53	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) +0.16
2026-03-11 11:23	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-11 11:18	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-11 10:49	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-11 10:43	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-11 10:13	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-11 10:05	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) -0.16
2026-03-11 09:34	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-11 09:23	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-11 08:57	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-11 08:44	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-11 08:22	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-11 08:07	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-11 07:47	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-11 07:30	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-11 07:10	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-11 06:53	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) +0.16
2026-03-11 06:35	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-11 06:17	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) -0.16
2026-03-11 06:00	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-11 05:39	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-11 05:26	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-11 04:57	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-11 04:47	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-11 03:45	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) +0.16
2026-03-11 03:37	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-11 02:30	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) -0.16
2026-03-11 02:23	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-11 01:43	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-11 01:42	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-11 00:56	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-11 00:56	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-11 00:21	eval	Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive)
2026-03-11 00:18	eval	Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: -0.24 (Mild negative)
	reasoning Technical article, no rights discussion
2026-03-10 23:07	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-10 23:04	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-10 22:36	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-10 22:34	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-10 22:18	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-10 22:16	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-10 21:43	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-10 21:42	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-10 21:26	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-10 21:24	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-10 21:09	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-10 21:06	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-10 20:45	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-10 20:42	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) +0.16
2026-03-10 20:12	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-10 20:05	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) -0.16
2026-03-10 19:53	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-10 19:46	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-10 19:33	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-10 19:26	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-10 19:12	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-10 19:05	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) +0.16
2026-03-10 18:53	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-10 18:45	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) -0.16
2026-03-10 18:17	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-10 18:05	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-10 18:00	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-10 17:35	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) +0.16
2026-03-10 17:31	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-10 16:58	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) -0.16
2026-03-10 16:55	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion
2026-03-10 16:21	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive)
2026-03-10 16:19	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral)
	reasoning Technical article with no explicit human rights discussion

build ee2b489+gzrb · deployed 2026-03-10 22:52 UTC · evaluated 2026-03-16 02:03:38 UTC