| |
Alpha This system is experimental. Scores and classifications are early-stage research and may be unreliable. Methodology → |
|
| Summary ~lite Article discusses boycotting ChatGPT to stand up against authoritarianism.
Lite evaluation by llama-4-scout-wai-psq · editorial channel only · no per-section breakdown available
| |
Longitudinal
6 HN snapshots · 5 evals | |
Audit Trail
11 entries | 2026-03-05 05:07 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.280 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 05:07 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) | | | 2026-03-05 05:03 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=-0.364 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 05:03 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq: -0.36 (Moderate negative) 0.00 | | | 2026-03-05 04:58 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=-0.364 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 04:58 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq: -0.36 (Moderate negative) | | | 2026-03-04 21:13 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.16) | - - | | 2026-03-04 21:13 | rater_validation_warn | Lite validation warnings for model llama-4-scout-wai: 0W 1R | - - | | 2026-03-04 21:13 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.16 (Mild positive) | | | reasoning Editorial stance criticizes ChatGPT, linking it to authoritarianism. Transparency indicators: author identified, date vi | | 2026-03-04 21:13 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.28) | - - | | 2026-03-04 21:13 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.28 (Mild positive) | | | reasoning Commentary on tech ethics | | |
| |