The one science reform we can all agree on, but we're too cowardly to do

Alpha This system is experimental. Scores and classifications are early-stage research and may be unreliable. Methodology →

Model: @cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct lite ND @cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast lite ND @cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct lite +0.10 @cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast lite -0.04 @cf/qwen/qwen3-30b-a3b-fp8 lite ND @cf/qwen/qwen3-30b-a3b-fp8 lite ND openai/gpt-oss-120b:free lite ND google/gemma-3-27b-it:free lite ND qwen/qwen3-coder:free lite ND Compare

ND	The one science reform we can all agree on, but we're too cowardly to do (www.experimental-history.com)
	399 points by sito42 12 days ago \| 147 comments on HN ~lite vlite-2.0

Summary ~lite

Article discusses science reform with a critical tone.

Lite evaluation by llama-4-scout-wai-psq · editorial channel only · no per-section breakdown available

Longitudinal 918 HN snapshots · 60 evals

Audit Trail 80 entries

2026-03-06 22:52	eval_success	PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.280 (3 dims)	- -
2026-03-06 22:52	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-06 22:47	eval_success	PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.280 (3 dims)	- -
2026-03-06 22:47	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-06 22:36	eval_success	PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=-0.400 (3 dims)	- -
2026-03-06 22:36	eval	Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq: -0.40 (Moderate negative) 0.00
2026-03-06 17:50	eval_success	PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.280 (3 dims)	- -
2026-03-06 17:50	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-06 17:33	eval_success	PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=-0.400 (3 dims)	- -
2026-03-06 17:33	eval	Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq: -0.40 (Moderate negative) 0.00
2026-03-06 04:46	eval_success	PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.280 (3 dims)	- -
2026-03-06 04:46	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-06 04:18	eval_success	PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=-0.400 (3 dims)	- -
2026-03-06 04:18	eval	Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq: -0.40 (Moderate negative) 0.00
2026-03-05 18:53	eval_success	PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.280 (3 dims)	- -
2026-03-05 18:53	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-05 15:15	eval_success	PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=-0.400 (3 dims)	- -
2026-03-05 15:15	eval	Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq: -0.40 (Moderate negative) 0.00
2026-03-05 15:11	eval_success	PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=-0.400 (3 dims)	- -
2026-03-05 15:11	eval	Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq: -0.40 (Moderate negative) 0.00
2026-03-05 07:53	eval_success	PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.280 (3 dims)	- -
2026-03-05 07:53	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-05 07:48	eval_success	PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.280 (3 dims)	- -
2026-03-05 07:48	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) 0.00
2026-03-05 06:53	eval_success	PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=-0.400 (3 dims)	- -
2026-03-05 06:53	eval	Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq: -0.40 (Moderate negative) 0.00
2026-03-05 06:48	eval_success	PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=-0.400 (3 dims)	- -
2026-03-05 06:48	eval	Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq: -0.40 (Moderate negative) 0.00
2026-03-05 04:43	eval_success	PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.280 (3 dims)	- -
2026-03-05 04:43	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive)
2026-03-05 04:26	eval_success	PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=-0.400 (3 dims)	- -
2026-03-05 04:26	eval	Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq: -0.40 (Moderate negative)
2026-03-05 04:13	eval_success	Lite evaluated: Neutral (-0.02)	- -
2026-03-05 04:13	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning The content discusses a science reform but does not explicitly mention human rights. It appears to be an opinion piece o
2026-03-05 04:13	rater_validation_warn	Lite validation warnings for model llama-4-scout-wai: 0W 1R	- -
2026-03-05 03:51	eval_success	Lite evaluated: Moderate negative (-0.42)	- -
2026-03-05 03:51	eval	Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: -0.42 (Moderate negative) 0.00
	reasoning science reform article
2026-03-05 03:39	eval_success	Lite evaluated: Neutral (-0.02)	- -
2026-03-05 03:39	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning The content discusses a science reform but does not explicitly mention human rights. It appears to be an opinion piece o
2026-03-05 03:35	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning The content discusses a science reform but does not explicitly mention human rights. It appears to be an opinion piece o
2026-03-05 03:07	eval	Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: -0.42 (Moderate negative) 0.00
	reasoning science reform article
2026-03-05 02:52	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) +0.08
	reasoning The content discusses a science reform but does not explicitly mention human rights. It appears to be an opinion piece o
2026-03-05 02:25	eval	Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: -0.42 (Moderate negative) 0.00
	reasoning science reform article
2026-03-05 02:20	eval	Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: -0.42 (Moderate negative) 0.00
	reasoning science reform article
2026-03-05 02:13	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.10 (Mild negative) -0.08
	reasoning The content discusses a science reform but does not explicitly mention human rights. It appears to be an opinion piece o
2026-03-05 01:47	eval	Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: -0.42 (Moderate negative) 0.00
	reasoning science reform article
2026-03-05 01:37	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning The content discusses a science reform but does not explicitly mention human rights. It appears to be an opinion piece o
2026-03-05 01:08	eval	Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: -0.42 (Moderate negative) 0.00
	reasoning science reform article
2026-03-05 00:59	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning The content discusses a science reform but does not explicitly mention human rights. It appears to be an opinion piece o
2026-03-05 00:32	eval	Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: -0.42 (Moderate negative) 0.00
	reasoning science reform article
2026-03-05 00:20	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning The content discusses a science reform but does not explicitly mention human rights. It appears to be an opinion piece o
2026-03-04 23:52	eval	Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: -0.42 (Moderate negative) 0.00
	reasoning science reform article
2026-03-04 23:41	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning The content discusses a science reform but does not explicitly mention human rights. It appears to be an opinion piece o
2026-03-04 23:16	eval	Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: -0.42 (Moderate negative) 0.00
	reasoning science reform article
2026-03-04 23:11	eval	Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: -0.42 (Moderate negative) 0.00
	reasoning science reform article
2026-03-04 22:59	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning The content discusses a science reform but does not explicitly mention human rights. It appears to be an opinion piece o
2026-03-04 22:55	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning The content discusses a science reform but does not explicitly mention human rights. It appears to be an opinion piece o
2026-03-04 22:30	eval	Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: -0.42 (Moderate negative) 0.00
	reasoning science reform article
2026-03-04 22:25	eval	Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: -0.42 (Moderate negative) 0.00
	reasoning science reform article
2026-03-04 22:12	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning The content discusses a science reform but does not explicitly mention human rights. It appears to be an opinion piece o
2026-03-04 22:07	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) +0.08
	reasoning The content discusses a science reform but does not explicitly mention human rights. It appears to be an opinion piece o
2026-03-04 21:52	eval	Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: -0.42 (Moderate negative) 0.00
	reasoning science reform article
2026-03-04 21:31	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.10 (Mild negative) -0.08
	reasoning The content discusses a science reform but does not explicitly mention human rights. It appears to be an opinion piece o
2026-03-04 21:18	eval	Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: -0.42 (Moderate negative) 0.00
	reasoning science reform article
2026-03-04 20:44	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) +0.08
	reasoning The content discusses a science reform but does not explicitly mention human rights. It appears to be an opinion piece o
2026-03-04 20:37	eval	Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: -0.42 (Moderate negative) 0.00
	reasoning science reform article
2026-03-04 20:11	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.10 (Mild negative) -0.08
	reasoning The content discusses a science reform but does not explicitly mention human rights. It appears to be an opinion piece o
2026-03-04 20:03	eval	Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: -0.42 (Moderate negative) 0.00
	reasoning science reform article
2026-03-04 19:52	eval	Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: -0.42 (Moderate negative) 0.00
	reasoning science reform article
2026-03-04 19:21	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning The content discusses a science reform but does not explicitly mention human rights. It appears to be an opinion piece o
2026-03-04 19:16	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning The content discusses a science reform but does not explicitly mention human rights. It appears to be an opinion piece o
2026-03-04 19:05	eval	Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: -0.42 (Moderate negative) 0.00
	reasoning science reform article
2026-03-04 19:00	eval	Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: -0.42 (Moderate negative) 0.00
	reasoning science reform article
2026-03-04 18:12	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) +0.08
	reasoning The content discusses a science reform but does not explicitly mention human rights. It appears to be an opinion piece o
2026-03-04 18:00	eval	Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: -0.42 (Moderate negative) 0.00
	reasoning science reform article
2026-03-04 16:43	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.10 (Mild negative) -0.08
	reasoning The content discusses a science reform but does not explicitly mention human rights. It appears to be an opinion piece o
2026-03-04 16:39	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral) 0.00
	reasoning The content discusses a science reform but does not explicitly mention human rights. It appears to be an opinion piece o
2026-03-04 16:34	eval	Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: -0.42 (Moderate negative) 0.00
	reasoning science reform article
2026-03-04 15:56	eval	Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.02 (Neutral)
	reasoning The content discusses a science reform but does not explicitly mention human rights. It appears to be an opinion piece o
2026-03-04 15:54	eval	Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: -0.42 (Moderate negative)
	reasoning science reform article

build ee2b489+gzrb · deployed 2026-03-10 22:52 UTC · evaluated 2026-03-16 02:03:38 UTC