| |
Beta This system is experimental. Scores and classifications are early-stage research and may be unreliable. Methodology → |
|
| Summary ~lite Article argues for boycotting ChatGPT to stand up against authoritarianism.
Lite evaluation by llama-4-scout-wai-psq · editorial channel only · no per-section breakdown available
| |
Longitudinal
5 HN snapshots · 5 evals | |
Audit Trail
10 entries | 2026-03-05 05:22 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.280 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 05:22 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) | | | 2026-03-05 05:19 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=-0.240 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 05:19 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq: -0.24 (Mild negative) 0.00 | | | 2026-03-05 05:14 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=-0.240 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 05:14 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq: -0.24 (Mild negative) | | | 2026-03-04 13:02 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.26) | - - | | 2026-03-04 13:02 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.26 (Mild positive) | | | reasoning Editorial stance criticizes ChatGPT, links to authoritarianism, Transparency indicators partially visible | | 2026-03-04 13:01 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.28) | - - | | 2026-03-04 13:01 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.28 (Mild positive) | | | reasoning Commentary on tech ethics | | |
| |