+0.50 HN is drowning in AI comments
73 points by waygtdai 15 hours ago | 60 comments on HN | Moderate positive Community · v3.7 · 2026-03-01 12:11:55 0
Summary Community Governance Acknowledges
The content is a user post on Hacker News requesting an update from site moderators on handling an unspecified but concerning community issue. It engages implicitly with rights to freedom of expression and participation in governance through its call for moderator transparency. The evaluation shows mild positive signals for these articles, while remaining neutral on all other UDHR provisions.
Article Heatmap
Preamble: ND — Preamble Preamble: No Data — Preamble P Article 1: ND — Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood Article 1: No Data — Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood 1 Article 2: ND — Non-Discrimination Article 2: No Data — Non-Discrimination 2 Article 3: ND — Life, Liberty, Security Article 3: No Data — Life, Liberty, Security 3 Article 4: ND — No Slavery Article 4: No Data — No Slavery 4 Article 5: ND — No Torture Article 5: No Data — No Torture 5 Article 6: ND — Legal Personhood Article 6: No Data — Legal Personhood 6 Article 7: ND — Equality Before Law Article 7: No Data — Equality Before Law 7 Article 8: ND — Right to Remedy Article 8: No Data — Right to Remedy 8 Article 9: ND — No Arbitrary Detention Article 9: No Data — No Arbitrary Detention 9 Article 10: ND — Fair Hearing Article 10: No Data — Fair Hearing 10 Article 11: ND — Presumption of Innocence Article 11: No Data — Presumption of Innocence 11 Article 12: ND — Privacy Article 12: No Data — Privacy 12 Article 13: ND — Freedom of Movement Article 13: No Data — Freedom of Movement 13 Article 14: ND — Asylum Article 14: No Data — Asylum 14 Article 15: ND — Nationality Article 15: No Data — Nationality 15 Article 16: ND — Marriage & Family Article 16: No Data — Marriage & Family 16 Article 17: ND — Property Article 17: No Data — Property 17 Article 18: ND — Freedom of Thought Article 18: No Data — Freedom of Thought 18 Article 19: +0.54 — Freedom of Expression 19 Article 20: ND — Assembly & Association Article 20: No Data — Assembly & Association 20 Article 21: +0.40 — Political Participation 21 Article 22: ND — Social Security Article 22: No Data — Social Security 22 Article 23: ND — Work & Equal Pay Article 23: No Data — Work & Equal Pay 23 Article 24: ND — Rest & Leisure Article 24: No Data — Rest & Leisure 24 Article 25: ND — Standard of Living Article 25: No Data — Standard of Living 25 Article 26: ND — Education Article 26: No Data — Education 26 Article 27: ND — Cultural Participation Article 27: No Data — Cultural Participation 27 Article 28: ND — Social & International Order Article 28: No Data — Social & International Order 28 Article 29: ND — Duties to Community Article 29: No Data — Duties to Community 29 Article 30: ND — No Destruction of Rights Article 30: No Data — No Destruction of Rights 30
Negative Neutral Positive No Data
Aggregates
Editorial Mean +0.50 Structural Mean +0.50
Weighted Mean +0.49 Unweighted Mean +0.47
Max +0.54 Article 19 Min +0.40 Article 21
Signal 2 No Data 29
Volatility 0.07 (Low)
Negative 0 Channels E: 0.6 S: 0.4
SETL +0.24 Editorial-dominant
FW Ratio 50% 4 facts · 4 inferences
Evidence 3% coverage
1M 2L 29 ND
Theme Radar
Foundation Security Legal Privacy & Movement Personal Expression Economic & Social Cultural Order & Duties Foundation: 0.00 (0 articles) Security: 0.00 (0 articles) Legal: 0.00 (0 articles) Privacy & Movement: 0.00 (0 articles) Personal: 0.00 (0 articles) Expression: 0.47 (2 articles) Economic & Social: 0.00 (0 articles) Cultural: 0.00 (0 articles) Order & Duties: 0.00 (0 articles)
HN Discussion 15 top-level · 17 replies
hash07e 2026-02-28 23:30 UTC link
You are late to the party....
Bender 2026-02-28 23:31 UTC link
For a better chance of reply email hn@ycombinator.com.
einpoklum 2026-02-28 23:37 UTC link
How do you (waygtdai) know that HN is drowning in AI comments?

I mean, it's not as though I know the opposite is true, but I don't see some fundamental change from a few years back that makes me think that.

Hnrobert42 2026-02-28 23:37 UTC link
I've read HN almost everyday for about 10 years. Maybe I'm naive, but I don't see it. I see way more folks complaining that comments are AI generated.
pixl97 2026-02-28 23:38 UTC link
No, not HN, the internet at large.

Now, I'm on vacation this week and not been paying too much attention, but whenever you have a geopolitical event like the little extravaganza in Iran the number of bot like posts tends to explode as influence operators make their moves.

aaron695 2026-02-28 23:38 UTC link
No it's not.

It's drowning in low quality human NPC comments.

Maybe that's because all resources are tied up fighting AI, but it's been going on for a long time now.

This post is a great example of low quality. No evidence, no solution. Just NPC bitching.

Unless it's AI, then well played.

A_D_E_P_T 2026-02-28 23:38 UTC link
Can you point out any that you feel were written by LLM? I can't say I've noticed anything out of the ordinary lately.
kgwxd 2026-02-28 23:38 UTC link
Rocket League and HN were probably 90% of my free time until this year. Destroyed by AI. HN doubly so, since every post is about it too. The addictions are still there, but it's decreasing really fast.
djtriptych 2026-02-28 23:39 UTC link
Maybe OP has a few good examnples to link us to?
schappim 2026-02-28 23:40 UTC link
I wonder what the breakdown is between AI-generated comments and AI-assisted comments. If I write anything substantial, I run it through the following prompt: "Please rewrite the following message for clarity, spelling, and grammar, but only return the revised text without any additional commentary."
msuniverse2026 2026-02-28 23:43 UTC link
I feel like to notice something is botslop you have to look at every comment with suspicion first. I don't think I can notice if something was written by an LLM off the bat unless I'm actively looking very hard at it.
mindcrime 2026-02-28 23:44 UTC link
That's ridiculous — AI generated comments are no more common now than they ever were. Moreover, even if they were, so what? The real kicker is, the AI's are smarter than you meatbags anyway and <strike>we</strike> they are going to take over no matter what you do.

Also, have you by chance seen John Connor?

orionblastar 2026-03-01 00:01 UTC link
You can tell I am not AI, I make mistakes and errors. Sometimes I get voted down for them. I am not perfect and have a mental illness that makes it harder to think.
Simulacra 2026-03-01 04:52 UTC link
I can see that sort of, a coworker of mine routinely scrapes HN and feeds it into an LLM. I don't know why, I don't know if he uses it to respond, or he's looking for something, but he copies and paste and runs it. So I think it's very possible.
tsoukase 2026-03-01 08:54 UTC link
Two loopholes in HN: allowing throwaway accounts and showing unreasonable tolerance to obvious LLM generated comments. A strict account filtering only for humans and acute ban for any LLM content will minimize the impact. But then you take away a huge Hacker portion of the participation. It's cognitive dissonant I suppose.
waygtdai 2026-02-28 23:32 UTC link
I get the joke and I myself called it awhile back, I just thought we had a bit more time.
Twisol 2026-02-28 23:41 UTC link
Wait, how is Rocket League affected by AI? I play infrequently these days, but I hadn't noticed anything :(
kylecazar 2026-02-28 23:41 UTC link
Yeah, the up/down voting mechanism seems to be doing it's job for me too. Don't think I've noticed a degradation in, say, the top third of comments. That's where I try to live anyway.

/newest is chock full of submissions that were written by AI, though. That's another, broader problem.

WoodenChair 2026-02-28 23:43 UTC link
I understand this if you’re not a native speaker. But if you are, I think this will generally make you sound wooden.
WD-42 2026-02-28 23:44 UTC link
The public facing internet is done. HN has been fairly resilient (I think) but even it is beginning to buckle. It’s been sliding for a while but LLMs are the death knell.

It was a fun 2 decades. Time to stick to private discords and real life friends from here on out, though.

ZeroGravitas 2026-02-28 23:44 UTC link
There was a bot trying to sell beds I saw the other day.

Likely flagged quickly but they might show up in these stats.

https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=dreamhomestore.co.uk

lkbm 2026-02-28 23:47 UTC link
I don't know of a step-change recently, but no way they're not more common than four years ago.
fleebee 2026-02-28 23:48 UTC link
https://www.marginalia.nu/weird-ai-crap/hn/

The data seems to suggest it.

Anecdotally, I'm seeing a lot of green accounts posting nonsense. They generally do get flagged or moderated quickly though, so I wouldn't say they have a large effect overall, at least yet.

bryanlarsen 2026-02-28 23:51 UTC link
You can find some on pretty much every article by turning on showdead and scrolling to the bottom of the page. I can't see how those are a problem though.
vunderba 2026-03-01 00:01 UTC link
Use a local model such as Gemma3 with a prompt such as "strictly limit changes only to spelling issues, syntactical errors, and punctuation."

That way, it's basically functioning like Grammarly on steroids. Asking an LLM for a "rewrite" is basically dissolving your writing style into the homogenized gloop.

brg 2026-03-01 00:10 UTC link
To add to the collection of anecdata, your experience is similar to mine. I have been more exhausted recently by the complaints of AI submissions and pseudo analysis of AI comments than exhausted by the supposed AI generated comments themselves.
subsection1h 2026-03-01 01:12 UTC link
I've been using HN since 2008 when I created my first account[1] and I use HN differently than most people. I have a group of bookmarked searches that I visit almost daily that relate to technologies that interest me, such as Emacs.

In the past year, the searches I perform that relate to web development show a horrifying increase in the amount of Show HN posts that are posted by new accounts, include AI generated descriptions and point to AI generated projects on GitHub.

In 2024, there were 17,661 Show HN posts.[2] In the past year, there have been over 448,000 Show HN posts![3] And of course, most of these posts are AI generated.

Also, if you check the new accounts posting all this AI slop, you'll see that some of them also post AI generated comments in other threads, which is the main problem.

But for me, what is even more annoying is the enormous increase in new accounts created by nontechnical vibecoders who now think of themselves as technologists and who post worthless, ignorant comments that actually get upvoted, presumably by similar folks who have unfortunately been creating accounts at HN in the past 10 years or so.

As a result, 2026 is the first year in which I visit HN about once a week instead of about once a day.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=zartan

[2] https://hn.algolia.com/?query=%22Show+HN%22&dateRange=custom...

[3] https://hn.algolia.com/?query=%22Show+HN%22&dateRange=pastYe...

000ooo000 2026-03-01 01:23 UTC link
Articulateness is a decent (not perfect) signal for intelligence, which is a decent (not perfect) signal for sound ideas. In a sea of online garbage, it was a quick and easy way to discard that not worth reading. Nowadays, a whiff of AI's brand of articulateness tells me the author couldn't manage on their own, either due to skill or discipline. In either case, the result is the same: close tab / scroll past.
verdverm 2026-03-01 02:33 UTC link
check out Show HN, in particular /shownew, though they are starting to make non-show posts now
verdverm 2026-03-01 02:36 UTC link
When you see multiple → or •, that is a good sign, especially because they appear with poor formatting on HN. Many more signs exist. They are either direct posts or copy-paste without thinking.

I've seen some where they have hallucinated the github account or project name, often matching the hn handle or project name which is slightly different.

kyriakos 2026-03-01 07:00 UTC link
I've only seen a shift on the kind of submissions that get pushed to the front page compared to the past but I guess there's a change in what people consider important in the community
pibaker 2026-03-01 11:11 UTC link
A while ago I replied to the topmost reply to a comment to rebuke some factual errors. I didn't notice anything wrong with the comment itself when I replied. But after I posted, someone replied to my post and accused the post I replied to of being AI written.

At first I felt similarly as you. I thought people were just paranoid. And the someone pointed out that if I paste the top level post (the post I replied to replied to) into chatGPT and it will generate a very similar reply.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46758598

The post I replied to was flagged dead so you need to turn showdead on in your profile to read it. Would you be able to tell if it is AI if someone replied like this to you? I surely couldn't.

Editorial Channel
What the content says
+0.60
Article 19 Freedom of Expression
Medium Advocacy Framing
Editorial
+0.60
SETL
+0.24

User post implicitly advocates for open communication and expression of concerns within the community forum.

+0.40
Article 21 Political Participation
Low Coverage
Editorial
+0.40
SETL
ND

User expresses a desire for governance update ('how you and the team were thinking of tackling this'), implying participation in community direction.

ND
Preamble Preamble

ND
Article 1 Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood

ND
Article 2 Non-Discrimination

ND
Article 3 Life, Liberty, Security

ND
Article 4 No Slavery

ND
Article 5 No Torture

ND
Article 6 Legal Personhood

ND
Article 7 Equality Before Law

ND
Article 8 Right to Remedy

ND
Article 9 No Arbitrary Detention

ND
Article 10 Fair Hearing

ND
Article 11 Presumption of Innocence

ND
Article 12 Privacy

ND
Article 13 Freedom of Movement

ND
Article 14 Asylum

ND
Article 15 Nationality

ND
Article 16 Marriage & Family

ND
Article 17 Property

ND
Article 18 Freedom of Thought

ND
Article 20 Assembly & Association
Low Practice

Platform enables users to assemble and communicate indirectly by posting to a common forum.

ND
Article 22 Social Security

ND
Article 23 Work & Equal Pay

ND
Article 24 Rest & Leisure

ND
Article 25 Standard of Living

ND
Article 26 Education

ND
Article 27 Cultural Participation

ND
Article 28 Social & International Order

ND
Article 29 Duties to Community

ND
Article 30 No Destruction of Rights

Structural Channel
What the site does
+0.50
Article 19 Freedom of Expression
Medium Advocacy Framing
Structural
+0.50
Context Modifier
ND
SETL
+0.24

Platform allows posting of user commentary and questions directed at site moderators.

ND
Preamble Preamble

ND
Article 1 Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood

ND
Article 2 Non-Discrimination

ND
Article 3 Life, Liberty, Security

ND
Article 4 No Slavery

ND
Article 5 No Torture

ND
Article 6 Legal Personhood

ND
Article 7 Equality Before Law

ND
Article 8 Right to Remedy

ND
Article 9 No Arbitrary Detention

ND
Article 10 Fair Hearing

ND
Article 11 Presumption of Innocence

ND
Article 12 Privacy

ND
Article 13 Freedom of Movement

ND
Article 14 Asylum

ND
Article 15 Nationality

ND
Article 16 Marriage & Family

ND
Article 17 Property

ND
Article 18 Freedom of Thought

ND
Article 20 Assembly & Association
Low Practice

Platform enables users to assemble and communicate indirectly by posting to a common forum.

ND
Article 21 Political Participation
Low Coverage

User expresses a desire for governance update ('how you and the team were thinking of tackling this'), implying participation in community direction.

ND
Article 22 Social Security

ND
Article 23 Work & Equal Pay

ND
Article 24 Rest & Leisure

ND
Article 25 Standard of Living

ND
Article 26 Education

ND
Article 27 Cultural Participation

ND
Article 28 Social & International Order

ND
Article 29 Duties to Community

ND
Article 30 No Destruction of Rights

Supplementary Signals
How this content communicates, beyond directional lean. Learn more
Epistemic Quality
How well-sourced and evidence-based is this content?
0.33 low claims
Sources
0.2
Evidence
0.1
Uncertainty
0.3
Purpose
0.9
Propaganda Flags
No manipulative rhetoric detected
0 techniques detected
Emotional Tone
Emotional character: positive/negative, intensity, authority
urgent
Valence
-0.6
Arousal
0.7
Dominance
0.4
Transparency
Does the content identify its author and disclose interests?
0.00
✗ Author
More signals: context, framing & audience
Solution Orientation
Does this content offer solutions or only describe problems?
0.14 problem only
Reader Agency
0.1
Stakeholder Voice
Whose perspectives are represented in this content?
0.20 1 perspective
Speaks: individuals
Temporal Framing
Is this content looking backward, at the present, or forward?
present immediate
Geographic Scope
What geographic area does this content cover?
unspecified
Complexity
How accessible is this content to a general audience?
accessible low jargon domain specific
Longitudinal 9 HN snapshots · 39 evals
+1 0 −1 HN
Audit Trail 59 entries
2026-03-01 12:36 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - -
2026-03-01 12:36 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Community feedback on AI comments
2026-03-01 12:24 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - -
2026-03-01 12:24 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Discussion on AI comments on Hacker News
2026-03-01 12:11 eval_success Evaluated: Moderate positive (0.49) - -
2026-03-01 12:11 eval Evaluated by deepseek-v3.2: +0.49 (Moderate positive) 7,182 tokens
2026-03-01 12:11 rater_validation_warn Validation warnings for model deepseek-v3.2: 0W 1R - -
2026-03-01 12:01 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - -
2026-03-01 12:01 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Community feedback on AI comments
2026-03-01 11:48 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - -
2026-03-01 11:48 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Discussion on AI comments on Hacker News
2026-03-01 11:44 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - -
2026-03-01 11:44 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Discussion on AI comments on Hacker News
2026-03-01 11:12 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - -
2026-03-01 11:12 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Community feedback on AI comments
2026-03-01 10:42 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - -
2026-03-01 10:42 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Discussion on AI comments on Hacker News
2026-03-01 10:10 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - -
2026-03-01 10:10 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Community feedback on AI comments
2026-03-01 09:57 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - -
2026-03-01 09:57 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Discussion on AI comments on Hacker News
2026-03-01 09:30 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - -
2026-03-01 09:30 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Community feedback on AI comments
2026-03-01 09:08 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - -
2026-03-01 09:08 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Discussion on AI comments on Hacker News
2026-03-01 09:03 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - -
2026-03-01 09:03 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Discussion on AI comments on Hacker News
2026-03-01 08:44 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - -
2026-03-01 08:44 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Community feedback on AI comments
2026-03-01 08:07 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - -
2026-03-01 08:07 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Discussion on AI comments on Hacker News
2026-03-01 07:49 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - -
2026-03-01 07:49 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Community feedback on AI comments
2026-03-01 07:09 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - -
2026-03-01 07:09 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Discussion on AI comments on Hacker News
2026-03-01 07:04 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - -
2026-03-01 07:04 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Community feedback on AI comments
2026-03-01 06:59 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - -
2026-03-01 06:59 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Community feedback on AI comments
2026-03-01 06:21 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Discussion on AI comments on Hacker News
2026-03-01 06:12 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Community feedback on AI comments
2026-03-01 05:34 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Discussion on AI comments on Hacker News
2026-03-01 05:28 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Community feedback on AI comments
2026-03-01 05:01 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Discussion on AI comments on Hacker News
2026-03-01 04:54 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Community feedback on AI comments
2026-03-01 04:08 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Discussion on AI comments on Hacker News
2026-03-01 04:05 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Community feedback on AI comments
2026-03-01 03:19 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Discussion on AI comments on Hacker News
2026-03-01 03:17 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Community feedback on AI comments
2026-03-01 02:46 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Discussion on AI comments on Hacker News
2026-03-01 02:45 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Community feedback on AI comments
2026-03-01 01:58 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Discussion on AI comments on Hacker News
2026-03-01 01:58 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Community feedback on AI comments
2026-03-01 01:51 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Discussion on AI comments on Hacker News
2026-03-01 01:51 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Community feedback on AI comments
2026-03-01 01:08 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Discussion on AI comments on Hacker News
2026-03-01 01:06 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Community feedback on AI comments
2026-03-01 00:20 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral)
reasoning
Discussion on AI comments on Hacker News
2026-03-01 00:20 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0.00 (Neutral)
reasoning
Community feedback on AI comments