home / item 47198151
Model Comparison
Model Editorial Structural Class Conf SETL Theme deepseek/deepseek-v3.2-20251201 +0.22 +0.17 Mild positive 0.07 0.08 Information Access @cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct lite 0.00 ND Neutral 1.00 0.00 Technology Access @cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast lite 0.00 ND Neutral 0.90 0.00 Open Source
Section deepseek/deepseek-v3.2-20251201 @cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct lite @cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast lite Preamble ND ND ND Article 1 ND ND ND Article 2 ND ND ND Article 3 ND ND ND Article 4 ND ND ND Article 5 ND ND ND Article 6 ND ND ND Article 7 ND ND ND Article 8 ND ND ND Article 9 ND ND ND Article 10 ND ND ND Article 11 ND ND ND Article 12 0.15 ND ND Article 13 ND ND ND Article 14 ND ND ND Article 15 ND ND ND Article 16 ND ND ND Article 17 ND ND ND Article 18 ND ND ND Article 19 0.30 ND ND Article 20 0.15 ND ND Article 21 ND ND ND Article 22 ND ND ND Article 23 0.10 ND ND Article 24 ND ND ND Article 25 ND ND ND Article 26 ND ND ND Article 27 0.35 ND ND Article 28 ND ND ND Article 29 0.10 ND ND Article 30 ND ND ND
Summary Information Access Acknowledges
The content is a Hacker News post promoting GitShow, a tool that aggregates and displays key metrics for public GitHub repositories. The evaluation finds mild positive leanings related to access to information (Article 19), participation in cultural life (Article 27), and incidental nods to privacy (Article 12) and community governance (Articles 20, 29). The overall disposition is technical and facilitative, acknowledging human rights dimensions of open-source collaboration without explicit advocacy.
Article Heatmap
Preamble: ND — Preamble Preamble: No Data — Preamble P Article 1: ND — Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood Article 1: No Data — Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood 1 Article 2: ND — Non-Discrimination Article 2: No Data — Non-Discrimination 2 Article 3: ND — Life, Liberty, Security Article 3: No Data — Life, Liberty, Security 3 Article 4: ND — No Slavery Article 4: No Data — No Slavery 4 Article 5: ND — No Torture Article 5: No Data — No Torture 5 Article 6: ND — Legal Personhood Article 6: No Data — Legal Personhood 6 Article 7: ND — Equality Before Law Article 7: No Data — Equality Before Law 7 Article 8: ND — Right to Remedy Article 8: No Data — Right to Remedy 8 Article 9: ND — No Arbitrary Detention Article 9: No Data — No Arbitrary Detention 9 Article 10: ND — Fair Hearing Article 10: No Data — Fair Hearing 10 Article 11: ND — Presumption of Innocence Article 11: No Data — Presumption of Innocence 11 Article 12: +0.15 — Privacy 12 Article 13: ND — Freedom of Movement Article 13: No Data — Freedom of Movement 13 Article 14: ND — Asylum Article 14: No Data — Asylum 14 Article 15: ND — Nationality Article 15: No Data — Nationality 15 Article 16: ND — Marriage & Family Article 16: No Data — Marriage & Family 16 Article 17: ND — Property Article 17: No Data — Property 17 Article 18: ND — Freedom of Thought Article 18: No Data — Freedom of Thought 18 Article 19: +0.30 — Freedom of Expression 19 Article 20: +0.15 — Assembly & Association 20 Article 21: ND — Political Participation Article 21: No Data — Political Participation 21 Article 22: ND — Social Security Article 22: No Data — Social Security 22 Article 23: +0.10 — Work & Equal Pay 23 Article 24: ND — Rest & Leisure Article 24: No Data — Rest & Leisure 24 Article 25: ND — Standard of Living Article 25: No Data — Standard of Living 25 Article 26: ND — Education Article 26: No Data — Education 26 Article 27: +0.35 — Cultural Participation 27 Article 28: ND — Social & International Order Article 28: No Data — Social & International Order 28 Article 29: +0.10 — Duties to Community 29 Article 30: ND — No Destruction of Rights Article 30: No Data — No Destruction of Rights 30
Aggregates
Editorial Mean +0.22 Structural Mean +0.17 Weighted Mean +0.22 Unweighted Mean +0.19 Max +0.35 Article 27 Min +0.10 Article 23 Signal 6 No Data 25 Volatility 0.10 (Low) Negative 0 Channels E: 0.6 S: 0.4 SETL ℹ +0.08 Editorial-dominant FW Ratio ℹ 50% 7 facts · 7 inferences
Theme Radar
Foundation Security Legal Privacy & Movement Personal Expression Economic & Social Cultural Order & Duties Foundation: 0.00 (0 articles) Security: 0.00 (0 articles) Legal: 0.00 (0 articles) Privacy & Movement: 0.15 (1 articles) Personal: 0.00 (0 articles) Expression: 0.22 (2 articles) Economic & Social: 0.10 (1 articles) Cultural: 0.35 (1 articles) Order & Duties: 0.10 (1 articles) Editorial Channel
What the content says
+0.40
Medium Advocacy Practice
Entire post is about a tool designed to facilitate participation in the cultural and scientific life of the open-source community.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
The post describes a tool for viewing open source project data and states the tool is 'MIT licensed'. Inferences
The tool's purpose is to lower barriers to accessing and understanding open-source cultural/scientific work. +0.30
Medium Advocacy Coverage
Describes a tool that aggregates and surfaces public information about open-source projects, facilitating access to information.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
The post states the tool shows 'Contributors, languages, commit activity, community health, recent PRs'. Inferences
The tool's design to surface scattered information promotes access to information. +0.20
Low Advocacy Practice
Declares 'No AI processing', which relates to data collection without interference.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
The post states 'No signup, no AI processing, no paywall.' Inferences
A statement against AI processing implies a value for non-interference in personal data. +0.20
Low Practice
The tool highlights 'community health score', which includes checking for a 'code of conduct'.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
The post lists 'community health score' as checking for a 'code of conduct'. Inferences
Highlighting a code of conduct as a health metric positively frames community self-governance. +0.10
Low Practice
Tool surfaces 'Top contributors', giving visibility to the work of individuals in open-source projects.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
The post states the tool shows 'Top contributors with accurate total count'. Inferences
Highlighting contributors and their count gives visibility to the labor involved in open-source. +0.10
Low Practice
Highlighting 'code of conduct' as part of community health relates to duties to the community.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
The post mentions the community health score checks for a 'code of conduct'. Inferences
Including a code of conduct as a health metric implies support for community duties and order. ND
Low Practice
Content does not mention UDHR, foundational human rights principles, or dignity.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
The post describes a tool that generates a summary page for public GitHub repositories. Inferences
Making repository information more accessible supports the principle of shared community progress. ND
No content directly addressing equality in dignity and rights.
ND
No mention of non-discrimination.
ND
No mention of right to life, liberty, or security.
ND
No mention of slavery or servitude.
ND
No mention of torture or cruel treatment.
ND
No mention of recognition as a person before the law.
ND
No mention of equal protection of the law.
ND
No mention of effective remedy by competent tribunals.
ND
No mention of arbitrary arrest, detention, or exile.
ND
No mention of fair public hearing by independent tribunal.
ND
No mention of presumption of innocence or penal offense.
ND
No mention of freedom of movement or residence.
ND
No mention of asylum from persecution.
ND
No mention of right to a nationality.
ND
No mention of marriage and family.
ND
No mention of property ownership.
ND
No mention of freedom of thought, conscience, or religion.
ND
No direct mention of participation in government or public service.
ND
No mention of social security or economic rights realization.
ND
No mention of rest, leisure, or reasonable working hours.
ND
No mention of standard of living, health, or well-being.
ND
No mention of education, directed to human rights.
ND
No mention of social and international order for rights realization.
ND
No mention of destruction of rights or freedoms.
Structural Channel
What the site does
+0.30
Medium Advocacy Coverage
Tool's primary function is to compile and display publicly available repository data, acting as an information intermediary.
+0.30
Medium Advocacy Practice
The tool itself aggregates and makes accessible scientific/cultural outputs (software projects) and is itself MIT licensed.
+0.10
Low Advocacy Practice
Tool presents public repository data; does not disclose user tracking or data handling for its own site.
+0.10
Low Practice
The tool's output includes data points related to community governance, which relates to peaceful assembly.
+0.10
Low Practice
The structural output of the tool includes contributor counts and activity, which recognizes labor.
+0.10
Low Practice
Tool surfaces governance artifacts that frame community responsibilities.
ND
Low Practice
Page presents a tool designed to aggregate open-source project data, implicitly facilitating access to community information.
ND
No structural elements promoting equality in dignity and rights are observable.
ND
No structural features addressing discrimination are observable.
ND
No structural features pertaining to life, liberty, or security are observable.
ND
No structural features pertaining to slavery or servitude are observable.
ND
No structural features pertaining to torture or cruel treatment are observable.
ND
No structural features pertaining to legal personality are observable.
ND
No structural features pertaining to equal protection are observable.
ND
No structural features pertaining to remedies are observable.
ND
No structural features pertaining to arbitrary detention are observable.
ND
No structural features pertaining to fair hearings are observable.
ND
No structural features pertaining to criminal justice are observable.
ND
No structural features pertaining to movement are observable.
ND
No structural features pertaining to asylum are observable.
ND
No structural features pertaining to nationality are observable.
ND
No structural features pertaining to family are observable.
ND
No structural features pertaining to property are observable.
ND
No structural features pertaining to thought or conscience are observable.
ND
No structural features pertaining to political participation are observable.
ND
No structural features pertaining to social security are observable.
ND
No structural features pertaining to rest and leisure are observable.
ND
No structural features pertaining to standard of living are observable.
ND
No structural features pertaining to education are observable.
ND
No structural features pertaining to an international order are observable.
ND
No structural features pertaining to rights destruction are observable.
Supplementary Signals
How this content communicates, beyond directional lean.
Learn more How well-sourced and evidence-based is this content?
0.74 low claims
Sources 0.8 Evidence 0.7 Uncertainty 0.6 Purpose 1.0
No manipulative rhetoric detected
0 techniques detected
Emotional character: positive/negative, intensity, authority
measured
Valence +0.4 Arousal 0.3 Dominance 0.6
Does the content identify its author and disclose interests?
0.00
✗ Author
More signals: context, framing & audience Does this content offer solutions or only describe problems?
0.80 solution oriented
Whose perspectives are represented in this content?
0.30 1 perspective
Speaks: individuals
About: corporation institution community
Is this content looking backward, at the present, or forward?
present immediate
What geographic area does this content cover?
global How accessible is this content to a general audience?
moderate medium jargon domain specific
Longitudinal
39 HN snapshots · 3 evals
Audit Trail
7 entries all eval pipeline all models deepseek-v3.2 llama-4-scout-wai llama-3.3-70b-wai
newest first
2026-03-01 14:47 eval_success Evaluated: Mild positive (0.22) - - 2026-03-01 14:47 rater_validation_warn Validation warnings for model deepseek-v3.2: 0W 1R - - 2026-03-01 14:47
eval
Evaluated by deepseek-v3.2 : +0.22 (Mild positive) 8,640 tokens 2026-02-28 18:48 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - - 2026-02-28 18:48
eval
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai : 0.00 (Neutral) reasoning ED neutral tech tutorial
2026-02-28 18:48 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - - 2026-02-28 18:48
eval
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai : 0.00 (Neutral) reasoning Tech showcase no rights stance