| |
Alpha This system is experimental. Scores and classifications are early-stage research and may be unreliable. Methodology → |
| Summary ~lite The post discusses Ars Technica's fabrication of quotes and their subsequent removal of the story.
Lite evaluation by llama-4-scout-wai-psq · editorial channel only · no per-section breakdown available
| |
Longitudinal
· 5 evals | |
Audit Trail
11 entries | 2026-03-05 10:23 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.600 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 10:23 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.60 (Strong positive) | | | 2026-03-05 10:15 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.457 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 10:15 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq: +0.46 (Moderate positive) | | | 2026-03-01 07:57 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.10) | - - | | 2026-03-01 07:57 | model_divergence | Cross-model spread 0.30 exceeds threshold (2 models) | - - | | 2026-03-01 07:57 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.10 (Mild positive) -0.20 | | | reasoning CO neutral media critique | | 2026-03-01 07:55 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Moderate positive (0.40) | - - | | 2026-03-01 07:55 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.40 (Moderate positive) | | | reasoning Editorial stance on journalistic integrity and accuracy | | 2026-03-01 07:52 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Moderate positive (0.30) | - - | | 2026-03-01 07:52 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.30 (Moderate positive) | | | reasoning CO neutral media critique | | |
| |