| |
Alpha This system is experimental. Scores and classifications are early-stage research and may be unreliable. Methodology → |
| Summary ~lite The browser's sandboxing capabilities are explored as a potential solution for running untrusted code securely.
Lite evaluation by llama-4-scout-wai-psq · editorial channel only · no per-section breakdown available
| |
Longitudinal
· 4 evals | |
Audit Trail
8 entries | 2026-03-05 10:25 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.280 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 10:25 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) | | | 2026-03-05 10:21 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.483 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 10:21 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq: +0.48 (Moderate positive) | | | 2026-03-01 19:45 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Moderate positive (0.38) | - - | | 2026-03-01 19:45 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.38 (Moderate positive) | | | reasoning Editorial discussing browser sandboxing and security | | 2026-03-01 19:42 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.20) | - - | | 2026-03-01 19:42 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.20 (Mild positive) | | | reasoning ED acknowledges rights concerns | | |
| |