| |
Alpha This system is experimental. Scores and classifications are early-stage research and may be unreliable. Methodology → |
|
| Summary ~lite The article critically examines the generative AI industry, focusing on the claims and user numbers of ChatGPT.
Lite evaluation by llama-4-scout-wai-psq · editorial channel only · no per-section breakdown available
| |
Longitudinal
· 5 evals | |
Audit Trail
11 entries | 2026-03-05 12:51 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.440 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 12:51 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) | | | 2026-03-05 12:44 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=-0.099 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 12:44 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq: -0.10 (Neutral) 0.00 | | | 2026-03-05 12:39 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=-0.099 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 12:39 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq: -0.10 (Neutral) | | | 2026-03-01 17:29 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Moderate positive (0.56) | - - | | 2026-03-01 17:29 | model_divergence | Cross-model spread 0.36 exceeds threshold (2 models) | - - | | 2026-03-01 17:29 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.56 (Moderate positive) | | | reasoning Editorial criticizing AI industry, mentions labor exploitation | | 2026-03-01 17:28 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.20) | - - | | 2026-03-01 17:28 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.20 (Mild positive) | | | reasoning Editorial critiques AI con | | |
| |