ND Did missing/corrupt dates in COBOL default to 1875-05-20? (retrocomputing.stackexchange.com)
277 points by SeenNotHeard 387 days ago | 499 comments on HN ~lite vlite-2.0
Summary ~lite
Neutral Q&A discussion on COBOL date defaults.
Lite evaluation by llama-4-scout-wai-psq · editorial channel only · no per-section breakdown available
Longitudinal · 5 evals
+1 0 −1 HN
Audit Trail 11 entries
2026-03-05 12:51 eval_success PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.600 (3 dims) - -
2026-03-05 12:51 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.60 (Strong positive)
2026-03-05 12:51 rater_validation_warn Lite-v2 validation warnings for model llama-4-scout-wai-psq: 0W 1R - -
2026-03-05 12:40 eval_success PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.464 (3 dims) - -
2026-03-05 12:40 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq: +0.46 (Moderate positive)
2026-02-28 15:59 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - -
2026-02-28 15:59 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00
reasoning
Tech Q&A neutral stance
2026-02-28 15:57 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - -
2026-02-28 15:57 eval Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral)
reasoning
Tech Q&A site, no human rights discussion
2026-02-28 15:54 eval_success Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) - -
2026-02-28 15:54 eval Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0.00 (Neutral)
reasoning
Tech Q&A neutral stance