| |
Alpha This system is experimental. Scores and classifications are early-stage research and may be unreliable. Methodology → |
|
Model Comparison
| Model | Editorial | Structural | Class | Conf | SETL | Theme | | @cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct lite | ND | ND | — | 0.87 | — | — | | @cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct lite | 0.00 | +0.17 | Neutral | 1.00 | -0.17 | Technology Internet | | Section | @cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct lite | @cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct lite | Delta | | Preamble | ND | ND | | Article 1 | ND | ND | | Article 2 | ND | ND | | Article 3 | ND | ND | | Article 4 | ND | ND | | Article 5 | ND | ND | | Article 6 | ND | ND | | Article 7 | ND | ND | | Article 8 | ND | ND | | Article 9 | ND | ND | | Article 10 | ND | ND | | Article 11 | ND | ND | | Article 12 | ND | ND | | Article 13 | ND | ND | | Article 14 | ND | ND | | Article 15 | ND | ND | | Article 16 | ND | ND | | Article 17 | ND | ND | | Article 18 | ND | ND | | Article 19 | ND | ND | | Article 20 | ND | ND | | Article 21 | ND | ND | | Article 22 | ND | ND | | Article 23 | ND | ND | | Article 24 | ND | ND | | Article 25 | ND | ND | | Article 26 | ND | ND | | Article 27 | ND | ND | | Article 28 | ND | ND | | Article 29 | ND | ND | | Article 30 | ND | ND | | Summary ~lite The article examines the slow progress of the IPv6 transition, 25 years after its inception.
Lite evaluation by llama-4-scout-wai-psq · editorial channel only · no per-section breakdown available
| |
Longitudinal
· 2 evals | |
Audit Trail
5 entries | 2026-03-27 01:44 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.440 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-27 01:44 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) | | | 2026-03-27 01:37 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.07) | - - | | 2026-03-27 01:37 | rater_validation_warn | Lite validation warnings for model llama-4-scout-wai: 1W 0R | - - | | 2026-03-27 01:37 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.07 (Neutral) | | | reasoning Technical article on IPv6 transition, no explicit human rights discussion | | |
| |