| |
Alpha This system is experimental. Scores and classifications are early-stage research and may be unreliable. Methodology → |
|
| Summary ~lite Japanese court rules AI cannot be issued patents, citing law recognizes only 'natural persons' as inventors.
Lite evaluation by llama-4-scout-wai-psq · editorial channel only · no per-section breakdown available
| |
Longitudinal
· 5 evals | |
Audit Trail
10 entries | 2026-03-05 13:31 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.120 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 13:31 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) | | | 2026-03-05 13:24 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.194 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 13:24 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq: +0.19 (Mild positive) | | | 2026-03-01 10:57 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.20) | - - | | 2026-03-01 10:57 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.20 (Mild positive) | | | reasoning Editorial stance on AI patent rights, neutral to slightly positive | | 2026-03-01 10:56 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) | - - | | 2026-03-01 10:56 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) 0.00 | | | reasoning Neutral news reporting | | 2026-03-01 10:51 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) | - - | | 2026-03-01 10:51 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) | | | reasoning Neutral news reporting | | |
| |