| |
Alpha This system is experimental. Scores and classifications are early-stage research and may be unreliable. Methodology → |
|
| Summary ~lite The post discusses a German court ruling that found a developer guilty of 'hacking' for exposing hardcoded credentials.
Lite evaluation by llama-4-scout-wai-psq · editorial channel only · no per-section breakdown available
| |
Longitudinal
· 4 evals | |
Audit Trail
8 entries | 2026-03-05 13:51 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.600 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 13:51 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.60 (Strong positive) | | | 2026-03-05 13:45 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.419 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 13:45 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq: +0.42 (Moderate positive) | | | 2026-03-01 07:58 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Moderate positive (0.56) | - - | | 2026-03-01 07:58 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.56 (Moderate positive) | | | reasoning Editorial criticizing German law on security research | | 2026-03-01 07:53 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Strong positive (0.64) | - - | | 2026-03-01 07:53 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.64 (Strong positive) | | | reasoning Implicitly supportive of security research | | |
| |