| |
Alpha This system is experimental. Scores and classifications are early-stage research and may be unreliable. Methodology → |
|
| Summary ~lite The article discusses Illinois' plan to ban book bans, promoting access to information and literacy.
Lite evaluation by llama-4-scout-wai-psq · editorial channel only · no per-section breakdown available
| |
Longitudinal
· 4 evals | |
Audit Trail
8 entries | 2026-03-05 14:45 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.280 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 14:45 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) | | | 2026-03-05 14:38 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.120 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 14:38 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq: +0.12 (Mild positive) | | | 2026-03-01 03:44 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Strong positive (0.60) | - - | | 2026-03-01 03:44 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) | | | reasoning Editorial stance on book bans and human rights | | 2026-03-01 03:39 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Strong positive (0.60) | - - | | 2026-03-01 03:39 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.60 (Strong positive) | | | reasoning Editorial supports human rights | | |
| |