| |
Alpha This system is experimental. Scores and classifications are early-stage research and may be unreliable. Methodology → |
|
| Summary ~lite Article evaluates second-order thinking as a mental model for outperforming, with no clear threats or trust damage.
Lite evaluation by llama-4-scout-wai-psq · editorial channel only · no per-section breakdown available
| |
Longitudinal
· 4 evals | |
Audit Trail
10 entries | 2026-03-05 15:49 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.280 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 15:49 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) | | | 2026-03-05 15:41 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.440 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 15:41 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq: +0.44 (Moderate positive) | | | 2026-02-28 10:47 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) | - - | | 2026-02-28 10:47 | rater_validation_warn | Lite validation warnings for model llama-4-scout-wai: 0W 1R | - - | | 2026-02-28 10:47 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) | | | reasoning Editorial on mental models, no human rights discussion | | 2026-02-28 10:42 | rater_validation_warn | Lite validation warnings for model llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0W 1R | - - | | 2026-02-28 10:42 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) | - - | | 2026-02-28 10:42 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) | | | reasoning Neutral tech article | | |
| |