| |
Alpha This system is experimental. Scores and classifications are early-stage research and may be unreliable. Methodology → |
|
| Summary ~lite Article critiques academic and scientific publishing, finding it to be a scam.
Lite evaluation by llama-4-scout-wai-psq · editorial channel only · no per-section breakdown available
| |
Longitudinal
· 5 evals | |
Audit Trail
14 entries | 2026-03-05 16:44 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.280 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 16:44 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) | | | 2026-03-05 16:36 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=-0.364 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 16:36 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq: -0.36 (Moderate negative) | | | 2026-03-03 09:59 | model_divergence | Cross-model spread 0.33 exceeds threshold (2 models) | - - | | 2026-03-03 09:59 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Mild negative (-0.16) | - - | | 2026-03-03 09:59 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.16 (Mild negative) 0.00 | | | reasoning The content discusses academic and scientific publishing, criticizing it as a scam, but does not explicitly mention huma | | 2026-03-03 09:59 | rater_validation_warn | Lite validation warnings for model llama-4-scout-wai: 1W 1R | - - | | 2026-03-03 09:52 | model_divergence | Cross-model spread 0.33 exceeds threshold (2 models) | - - | | 2026-03-03 09:52 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Mild negative (-0.16) | - - | | 2026-03-03 09:52 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.16 (Mild negative) | | | reasoning The content discusses academic and scientific publishing, criticizing it as a scam, but does not explicitly mention huma | | 2026-03-03 09:52 | rater_validation_warn | Lite validation warnings for model llama-4-scout-wai: 1W 1R | - - | | 2026-03-03 09:49 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Mild positive (0.17) | - - | | 2026-03-03 09:49 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: +0.17 (Mild positive) | | | reasoning Critique of academic publishing | | |
| |