| |
Alpha This system is experimental. Scores and classifications are early-stage research and may be unreliable. Methodology → |
|
| Summary ~lite The article constructively criticizes PostgreSQL, providing specific points of concern without using hostile language.
Lite evaluation by llama-4-scout-wai-psq · editorial channel only · no per-section breakdown available
| |
Longitudinal
· 4 evals | |
Audit Trail
8 entries | 2026-03-05 17:18 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.280 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 17:18 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) | | | 2026-03-05 17:09 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=-0.080 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-05 17:09 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai-psq: -0.08 (Neutral) | | | 2026-03-02 20:30 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) | - - | | 2026-03-02 20:30 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) | | | reasoning Editorial on PostgreSQL, no human rights discussion | | 2026-03-02 20:25 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Neutral (0.00) | - - | | 2026-03-02 20:25 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-3.3-70b-wai: 0.00 (Neutral) | | | reasoning Tech editorial neutral | | |
| |