| |
Alpha This system is experimental. Scores and classifications are early-stage research and may be unreliable. Methodology → |
|
| Summary ~lite The article critiques a 'scam paper' in a scientific journal, promoting critical thinking.
Lite evaluation by llama-4-scout-wai-psq · editorial channel only · no per-section breakdown available
| |
Longitudinal
· 2 evals | |
Audit Trail
5 entries | 2026-03-21 01:19 | eval_success | PSQ evaluated: g-PSQ=0.280 (3 dims) | - - | | 2026-03-21 01:19 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai-psq: +0.28 (Mild positive) | | | 2026-03-21 01:15 | eval_success | Lite evaluated: Neutral (-0.06) | - - | | 2026-03-21 01:14 | rater_validation_warn | Lite validation warnings for model llama-4-scout-wai: 1W 0R | - - | | 2026-03-21 01:14 |
eval
|
Evaluated by llama-4-scout-wai: -0.06 (Neutral) | | | reasoning Blog post discussing academic integrity and scientific journal issues, no explicit human rights discussion | | |
| |