This article announces Google's Nano Banana 2 AI image generation model with focus on technical capabilities and speed. The content does not directly engage human rights themes but creates tension between enabling free expression and information access (positive) and implementing extensive tracking infrastructure that undermines privacy (negative). Overall assessment is neutral regarding human rights compatibility, with offsetting structural signals on privacy, expression, and educational access.
I think this tech is cool, from an engineering perspective. I’m trying to figure out if there’s any justification for using it in a business world outside of: “We don’t want to pay an artist.”
You can argue things like code generation are an extension of the engineer wielding it. Image generation just seems like a net negative overall if it’s used at scale.
Edit: By scale, I mean large corporations putting content in front of millions. I understand the appeal for smaller businesses where they probably weren’t going to pay an artist anyway.
These image gen models are getting so advanced and life like that increasingly the general public are being duped into believing AI images are actually real (ex Facebook food images or fake OF models). Don't get me wrong I will enjoy the benefits of using this model for expressing myself better than ever before, but can't help feeling there's something also very insidious about these models too.
What a great thing this didn't exist in the past. We likely wouldn't have had any of the amazing artworks that we have now. Imagine an AI generated Mona Lisa, Nightwatch or Sistine Chapel ceiling because prompting would have been so much cheaper than paying Leonardo, Rembrandt or Michelangelo...
Now extrapolate to all other artforms. Sculpture seems safe, for now, but only barely so.
I'm building my personal home right now. The AI image models have been a game-changer in designing the look of the house. My architect did an OK job, but the details that Nano Banana added really bring the house up a notch. I just do hundreds of renders from the basic 3D models and I find looks that I like and iterate from there. We are implementing the renders from Nano Banana over our Interior Designers designs. We would not have hired the Interior Designers again after using Nano Banana to do our interiors.
I think part of the issue with architects and designers today is that they use CAD too much. It's easy to design boxes and basic roof lines in CAD. It's harder to put in curves and more craftsman features. Nano Banana's renders have more organic design features IMO.
Our house is looking great and we're very happy how it's going so far with a lot of the thanks to Nano Banana.
So far it does feel more iterative than an entirely new leap in terms of capabilities, but I haven't run it through the more multimodal aspects such as editing existing images.
That being said, it actually managed the King Louie jump rope test which surprised me.
I saw an item for sale on Ali Express's video and I thought "Wow, they hired some really attractive actors to pitch their little gadget." 30 seconds in, I realized they used GenAI. Not because it looked AI, but because the production values looked too high and professional for the item. I would get in on this if you sell anything online.
What they've chosen as examples to illustrate the strength of the new model surprises me.
The "cubism" example seems like it would be a closer fit to something like stained glass or something. I don't think the thing really understands what cubism was all about. Cubist painters were trying to free themselves from the confines of a single integral plane of perspective by allowing themselves to show various parts of the image from different viewpoints, different times, different styles, etc.
The division of the image into geometric shapes is just a by-product of that quest, whereas the examples here have made it the sum total of the whole piece.
This feels to me like an example of how LLMs still don't "understand" what the art means, and are just aping its facade.
I'm sure this has been written about but here's what happens long term - images are commoditized and lose their emotional appeal.
Probably about half of us here remember photos before the cell phone era. They were rare, and special, and you'd have a few photos per YEAR to look back on. The feel of photos back then, was at least 100x stronger than now. They were a special item, could be given as a gift. But once they became freely available that same amount of emotion is now split across many thousands of photos. (not saying this is good or bad, just increased supply reducing value of each item)
With image/art generation the same thing will happen and I can already feel it happening. Things that used to be beautiful or fantastic looking now just feel flat and AI-ish. If claymation scenes can be generated in 1s, and I see a million claymation diagrams a year, then claymation will lose its charm. If I see a million fake Tom Cruise videos, then it oversaturates my desire for desire for all Tom Cruise movies.
It's notable that this model is less advanced that the previous "Pro" model, and also that the Gemini interface is defaulting all requests to "Fast" even if you've previously changed it to Pro.
It still seems to have the same pitfalls as all the other image generation models. I ran it through my test prompt (wary of posting it here, lest it gets trained on) - it still cannot generate something along the lines of "object A, but with feature X from Y", where that combo has never been seen in the training data. I wonder how the "astronaut riding unicorn on the moon" was solved...
EDIT: after significant prompting, it actually solved it. I think it's the first one to do so in my testing.
"A macro close-up photograph of an old watchmaker's hands carefully replacing a tiny gear inside a vintage pocket watch. The watch mechanism is partially submerged in a shallow dish of clear water, causing visible refraction and light caustics across the brass gears. A single drop of water is falling from a pair of steel tweezers, captured mid splash on the water's surface. Reflect the watchmaker's face, slightly distorted, in the curved glass of the watch face. Sharp focus throughout, natural window lighting from the left, shot on 100mm macro lens." - Only major problem i could find at a glance is the clasps don't make sense probably, and the drop of water inside the watch on the cog doesn't make sense/cog mangled into tweezers.
"A candid photograph taken from behind an elderly woman sitting alone on a park bench in late autumn. She is gently resting one hand on the empty seat beside her, where a man's weathered flat cap and a folded newspaper sit untouched. Fallen golden leaves cover the path ahead. The low afternoon sun casts her long shadow alongside a second, fainter shadow that almost seems to be there, the suggestion of someone sitting next to her, visible only in the light on the ground. Muted, warm color palette, shallow depth of field on the background trees, photojournalistic style." - I don't know why but it internal errored twice on this one but then got there.
Some random predictions about what AI image generation tools will do/are doing to art:
1. The narrative/life of the artist becomes a lot more important. The most successful artists are ones that craft a story around their life and art, and don't just create stuff and stop. This will become even more important.
2. Originality matters more than ever. By design, these tools can only copy and mix things that already exist. But they aren't alive, they don't live in the world and have experiences, and they can't create something truly new.
3. Those that bother to learn the actual art skills, and not merely prompting, will increasingly be miles ahead of everyone else. People are lazy, and bothering to put in the time to actually learn stuff will stand out more and more. (Ditto for writing essays and other writing people are doing with AI.)
4. Taste continues to be the single most important thing. The vast, vast majority of AI art out there is...not very good. It's not going to get better, because the lack of taste isn't a technical problem.
5. Art with physical materials will become increasingly popular. That is, stuff that can't be digitized very well: sculpture, installation art, etc. Above all, AI art is uncool, which means it has no real future as a leading art form. This uncoolness will push people away from the screen and towards things that are more material.
I have Google AI Ultra. Where can I test this? They say its in aistudio, which says its a paid model and I need to setup billing (as if paying for Ultra isnt enough). They say its available in antigravity, but I cant seem to find it there?
Kind of surprised it hasn't been pulled yet. Have seen some very disturbing (grok tier) examples of completely bypassing whatever censors they have in place by simply asking gemini to write the prompt
If any AI image generation companies are reading this, I want the image to be in layers which can also be exported, so I can 1) do post processing of my own or 2) arrange for an AI image generation model to process just the layers i specify.
This looks like a response to Seedream 5.0 lite that was published two days ago.
I use all those fancy image models editing capabilities for my fast fashion web shop. I must say: product photography for clothing and accessories product is dead. Those models are amazing at style transfering and garment transferring.
We will see how good will be Seedream 5.0 full version.
Pretty close to Gemini 3 Pro Image (aka Nano Banana Pro) in most benchmarks, even without thinking+search, and even exceeding it in 2 most important ones of 'Overall Preference' and 'Visual Quality'. I'm excited about the big jump in Infographics/Factuality (even without thinking+search; I'm surprised that text+image search grounding doesn't make an even bigger dent).
This will stay useless for editing personal pictures so long as virtually every prompt with a person in it is met with "I can't edit images of some people". For whatever reason, they've made the celeb detection so ultra-aggressive that almost everyone is detected as a (lookalike) celeb.
It's more likely than not that every single person who uses the internet has viewed an AI image and taken it as real by now.
The obvious ones stand out, but there are so many that are indiscernible without spending lots of time digging through it. Even then there are ones that you can at best guess it's maybe AI gen.
Name recognition has big value. People remember what an advancement the first banana was. Nowadays it's no longer so unique, ChatGPT's and Grok's image editors are also strong.
I actually think this was a good thing. Manipulating images incredibly convincingly was already possible but the cost was high (many hours of highly skilled work). So many people assumed that most images they were seeing were "authentic" without much consideration. By making these fake images ubiquitous we are forcing people to quickly learn that they can't believe what they see on the internet and tracking down sources and deciding who you trust is critically important. People have always said that you can't believe what you see on the internet, but unfortunately many people have managed without major issue ignoring this advice. This wave will force them to take that advice to heart by default.
Ironically we live in a time that, overall, is probably better for artists than the world any of those guys grew up in. People have always valued art but not the artists, and many artists through history, including the famous ones, died broke with their works only posthumously attaining value.
These days, through commissions, art is a much more viable profession than it ever was.
Part of the job of interior design is delivering the promised images in … yknow, physical reality? How are you going from nano banana images to actual plans, materials, finishes, products, paint codes, … ?
Can you write a bit more about your workflow? I've been thinking about doing the same, but since I'm very non-interior-design minded have struggled to ask the right things.
Like...
What are your inputs to the model? Empty renders of the space, or more fully decorated views/ photos?
Do you have a light harness around this to help you discover the style you like and then stay consistent with it?
Do you find that giving a lot of context around the space you're designing helps (it hasn't in my attempts)?
Jaded, but if I knew there was a possibility of a bunch of incriminating footage of me (images, video, etc.) out there in the pre-AI days, I would do my absolute best to flood the internet with as many related deepfakes (including of myself) as possible.
It reminds me of the Star Wars content thats come out recently - before there was the Original Trilogy which we all watched many times and the lines became iconic. Since then it's all become a mismash and blur of mediocrity due to over-exposure.
(except The Mandalorian, and I can't believe I'm using the word "content" :/)
edit: Totally forgot about Andor & Rogue One sorry, great film and two seasons of top-notch storytelling.
Same! I redid my backyard entirely and needed ideas. Gemini took a pile of dirt and gave me countless ideas, improved my plans, recommended materials, etc. a designer gave me two out of the box ideas that Gemini didn’t come up with, but it did everything else perfectly. (Designer said, put a patio out in the yard and put your table there, and take your ugly shed and make it the center of attention, since you’ll never succeeed trying to hide it)
I had a similar thought before realizing that I'm pretty sure what they were demonstrating wasn't art style, but adherence to correct physical dimensions and construction of the buildings referenced, that was then expressed in an art style (or reasonable facsimile thereof). The before prompts would just conjure a random building out of thin air, the after prompts searched the web for reference material and then used that in image generation.
And actually, the link I saw a bit ago was this [0] which is more in-depth and has a lot more examples + prompts.
They can even combine the models, create the presenters with nano banana and then use that as the reference for a video model and paste in your product
I've been using it to replace things that I used to do for personal projects in photoshop/gimp. Remove a background, add a person, put a letter in here that looks like the same crayon as the other letters.
Things that would take me an hour or so the old way takes three minutes with NB.
But I can see this applying to small businesses. Something that some random person would have to spend on hour photoshopping can be done in a few minutes with NB.
> They were rare, and special, and you'd have a few photos per YEAR to look back on. The feel of photos back then, was at least 100x stronger than now. [...] But once they became freely available that same amount of emotion is now split across many thousands of photos
I don't think I fully agree. Sure people make so many photo's that they don't have the time or the will to start looking through them all.
You can't just whip out your phone and start scrolling through thousands of photo's with friends. It would get so boring so fast.
But if you put some effort into making a nice little selection of the best photo's, that emotion is 100% still there.
> They were rare, and special, and you'd have a few photos per YEAR to look back on. The feel of photos back then, was at least 100x stronger than now. They were a special item, could be given as a gift. But once they became freely available that same amount of emotion is now split across many thousands of photos. (not saying this is good or bad, just increased supply reducing value of each item)
I take a hundred photos on a trip, my phone uses AI (not even the new fancy AI, but old 5-10 year old stuff to detect smiling faces and people in frame) to pull out less than a dozen that are worth keeping. Once a month or so I get fed a reminder of some past trip.
This isn't any different than before. The number of photos taken is greater, but the overall number of worthwhile photos from a given trip is about the same.
I believe this is the reason for a return to interest in analog media with both my generation (millenials) and gen-z. I do wedding photography on the side, and the past ~2 years have seen a huge increase in requests for film photography, either exclusively film or as an add-on to digital. Offering film has been one of the best things I've done for my side hustle.
Likewise with the sort of resurgence of vinyl, and the obsession over "old" point and shoot digicams.
That's true, but you forgot a key piece in this puzzle. The AI can only produce things that already exist. It can combine new things, this is why you can it for a picture of Jesus planting a flag on the Moon. But it only works because Jesus is a concrete concept that already exists in our world. If you ask for a picture of jacquesm planting a flag on the Moon the result will be nonsensical.
ChatGPT's image generator has been able to do this since last year. That NBP still can't is baffling. They should at least train it to respond to requests for transparency with a solid colour pink background.
I actually built an app to accomplish this exact thing as I was finishing building my home and was clueless when it came to interior design. I'm genuinely astonished by the capabilities of these models with regards to this, and it feels vastly underutilized by the general populace. Being able to try out multiple paint colors in seconds, or add real furniture or wall decor from Ikea, or move objects around instantly - it still blows my mind.
> 1... The narrative/life of the artist becomes a lot more important.
When I watch a movie, I don't care about the artist's life. I care about character life, that's very different.
> 2... Originality matters more than ever. By design, these tools can only copy and mix things that already exist.
It's like you assigning to humans divine capabilities :) . Hyperbolizing a little, humans also only copy and mix - where do you think originality comes from? Granted, AI isn't at the level of humans yet, but they improve here.
> 4... It's not going to get better, because the lack of taste isn't a technical problem.
Engineers are in business of converting non-technical problems into technical ones. Just like AI now is way more capable than it was 20 years ago, and able to write interesting texts and make interesting pictures - something which at the time wasn't considered a technical problem - with time what we perceive as "taste" may likely improve.
> 5... Above all, AI art is uncool, which means it has no real future as a leading art form.
AI critics are for a long time mistaking the level with trend. Or, giving a comparison with SpaceX achievements, "you're currently here" - when there was a list of "first, get to the orbit, then we'll talk", "first, start regular payload deliveries to orbit, then we'll talk", "first, land the stage... send crewed capsule... do that in numbers..." and then, currently "first, send the Starship to orbit". "You're currently here" is the always existing point which isn't achieved at the moment and which gives to critics something to point to and mount the objection to the process as a whole, because, see, this particular thing isn't achieved yet.
You assume AI won't be able to make cool art with time. AI critics were shown time and time again to be underestimating the possibilities. Some people find it hard to learn in some particular topics.
Had a meeting with a friend the other day, discussing the 'times' and all that is happening around us.
I sit here thinking how wonderful and terrible of a time it is. If you can afford to sit in the stands and watch, it's exciting. There's never been so much change in such a short period of time. But if you're in the arena, or expecting to end up in the arena at some point, what terrifying moments lay ahead of you.
I never thought I'd say this, but I expect the arena is where I'll end up...I've enjoyed my time in the stands, but I'm running low on energy, capital and the will to keep trying.
Editorial Channel
What the content says
+0.20
Article 19Freedom of Expression
Medium Practice Framing
Editorial
+0.20
SETL
-0.23
Article is freely published information about technology without apparent censorship or restriction; publication itself supports free expression of ideas about AI capabilities.
Observable Facts
Article is published on public blog platform without paywall, registration requirement, or geographic access restrictions.
Article includes four primary social share buttons (X/Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, email) plus copy-link functionality, enabling distribution across platforms.
Site navigation includes multiple category links and breadcrumb structure, supporting discovery of diverse content types and facilitating information access.
Semantic markup includes NewsArticle schema with headline, author, and publisher information, supporting information distribution via search and aggregation platforms.
Inferences
Multiple share mechanisms structurally support freedom of expression by enabling readers to amplify and redistribute published information.
Unrestricted public access and open navigation support the principle that information should be freely available to all without discrimination.
The platform's architecture facilitates expression and information dissemination, core components of Article 19.
+0.10
Article 26Education
Low Coverage Framing
Editorial
+0.10
SETL
-0.09
Article provides technical explanation of AI model capabilities in accessible language; modest educational value for readers learning about current image generation technology.
Observable Facts
Article explains technical terms related to AI image generation including 'advanced world knowledge,' 'production-ready specs,' and 'subject consistency' in general-audience language.
Content is formatted with clear headline, descriptive subheading, and semantic HTML structure supporting readability and comprehension.
Article is freely accessible without educational prerequisites or paywalls, enabling broad public access to technology information.
Inferences
Public explanation of AI model capabilities contributes modestly to educational access regarding emerging technology.
Accessible presentation of technical concepts supports readers' ability to understand and learn about AI development.
Educational value is limited by marketing focus rather than deep technical or critical analysis of implications.
0.00
Article 12Privacy
High Practice
Editorial
0.00
SETL
+0.50
Article content does not address privacy or data protection; marketing focus is on product capabilities without discussing privacy implications of AI image generation.
Observable Facts
Page contains Google Analytics 4 tracking initialized via dataLayer with event properties including page_name, author_name, publish_date, and content_category.
Multiple third-party tracking domains are whitelisted and loaded: googleads.g.doubleclick.net, survey.g.doubleclick.net, cdn.ampproject.org, and www.google-analytics.com.
Feedback survey system is embedded via feedback-surveys-json script with scroll-depth trigger set to 75%, designed to collect user engagement data.
Cookie consent mechanism is referenced in safe script domains list, indicating consent collection infrastructure is present.
Inferences
Extensive tracking infrastructure collects user behavior, engagement depth, and preference data that could be used for profiling, which conflicts with Article 12 protection of privacy.
The combination of analytics, advertising pixels, and survey tracking represents systematic data collection beyond what is necessary for basic site operation.
Survey participation mechanism with scroll-depth triggers prioritizes data collection over user autonomy, weakening privacy protections.
ND
PreamblePreamble
Content does not engage with preamble themes of freedom, justice, or peace as foundational human rights principles.
ND
Article 1Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood
No content addressing equality, dignity, or reason as universal principles.
ND
Article 2Non-Discrimination
No content addressing discrimination or equality of rights.
ND
Article 3Life, Liberty, Security
Content does not address rights to life, liberty, or personal security.
ND
Article 4No Slavery
No content addressing slavery or servitude.
ND
Article 5No Torture
Content does not address torture or cruel treatment.
ND
Article 6Legal Personhood
No content addressing right to life.
ND
Article 7Equality Before Law
No content addressing equality before the law.
ND
Article 8Right to Remedy
No content addressing right to legal remedy.
ND
Article 9No Arbitrary Detention
No content addressing arbitrary arrest or detention.
ND
Article 10Fair Hearing
No content addressing fair trial rights.
ND
Article 11Presumption of Innocence
No content addressing presumption of innocence or due process.
ND
Article 13Freedom of Movement
No content addressing freedom of movement.
ND
Article 14Asylum
No content addressing right to seek asylum.
ND
Article 15Nationality
No content addressing right to nationality.
ND
Article 16Marriage & Family
No content addressing marriage or family rights.
ND
Article 17Property
No content addressing property rights.
ND
Article 18Freedom of Thought
No content addressing freedom of thought, conscience, or religion.
ND
Article 20Assembly & Association
No content addressing freedom of peaceful assembly.
ND
Article 21Political Participation
No content addressing democratic participation or political rights.
ND
Article 22Social Security
No content addressing social security rights.
ND
Article 23Work & Equal Pay
No content addressing right to work or fair employment.
ND
Article 24Rest & Leisure
No content addressing right to rest and leisure.
ND
Article 25Standard of Living
No content addressing rights to food, clothing, housing, or medical care.
ND
Article 27Cultural Participation
No content addressing participation in cultural, artistic, or scientific life.
ND
Article 28Social & International Order
No content addressing social and international order for rights.
ND
Article 29Duties to Community
No content addressing duties to community or limitations on rights.
ND
Article 30No Destruction of Rights
No content addressing protection or interpretation of the UDHR itself.
Structural Channel
What the site does
+0.35
Article 19Freedom of Expression
Medium Practice Framing
Structural
+0.35
Context Modifier
ND
SETL
-0.23
Site structure enables freedom of expression through multiple mechanisms: public publication without access restrictions, social sharing buttons for multiple platforms (X, Facebook, LinkedIn, email), and open navigation that supports content discovery and dissemination.
+0.15
Article 26Education
Low Coverage Framing
Structural
+0.15
Context Modifier
ND
SETL
-0.09
Content is structured and presented in accessible format (clear headings, semantic HTML) that supports reading comprehension and learning; free public access enables broad educational reach.
-0.50
Article 12Privacy
High Practice
Structural
-0.50
Context Modifier
ND
SETL
+0.50
Site structure implements extensive tracking that conflicts with Article 12 privacy protections: GA4 analytics with dataLayer initialization, Doubleclick advertising and tracking pixels, survey tracking infrastructure, and cookie consent mechanisms are all present and active.
ND
PreamblePreamble
Site structure and platform do not specifically address or implement preamble-level commitment to universal human rights.
ND
Article 1Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood
No structural mechanisms observable that specifically uphold or undermine Article 1 principles.
ND
Article 2Non-Discrimination
Site structure does not make discriminatory distinctions based on observable characteristics.
ND
Article 3Life, Liberty, Security
No structural elements observed that relate to physical safety or liberty.
ND
Article 4No Slavery
No observable structural elements that would violate or uphold this article.
ND
Article 5No Torture
No structural elements observable related to physical harm.
ND
Article 6Legal Personhood
No structural mechanisms observable that affect fundamental right to life.
ND
Article 7Equality Before Law
No legal or structural mechanisms observable that would differentiate users by legal status.
ND
Article 8Right to Remedy
No dispute resolution or remedial mechanisms observable on article page.
ND
Article 9No Arbitrary Detention
No mechanisms that could relate to arrest or detention observable.
ND
Article 10Fair Hearing
No judicial or trial-related structural elements observable.
ND
Article 11Presumption of Innocence
No criminal or legal process elements observable.
ND
Article 13Freedom of Movement
No mechanisms observable that would restrict or enable freedom of movement.
ND
Article 14Asylum
No asylum or refuge-related structural elements observable.
ND
Article 15Nationality
No mechanisms related to nationality observable.
ND
Article 16Marriage & Family
No mechanisms related to family or marriage observable.
ND
Article 17Property
No mechanisms related to property rights observable.
ND
Article 18Freedom of Thought
No restrictions observable that would limit freedom of thought.
ND
Article 20Assembly & Association
No mechanisms related to assembly observable.
ND
Article 21Political Participation
No mechanisms observable that would support or restrict political participation.
ND
Article 22Social Security
No social security or welfare mechanisms observable.
ND
Article 23Work & Equal Pay
No employment-related mechanisms observable.
ND
Article 24Rest & Leisure
No mechanisms related to working hours or leisure observable.
ND
Article 25Standard of Living
No mechanisms related to standard of living observable.
ND
Article 27Cultural Participation
No mechanisms observable that would restrict or enable cultural participation.
ND
Article 28Social & International Order
No structural elements observable related to international human rights frameworks.
ND
Article 29Duties to Community
No mechanisms observable that address community responsibilities.
ND
Article 30No Destruction of Rights
No mechanisms observable that specifically protect UDHR provisions.
Supplementary Signals
Epistemic Quality
0.52
Propaganda Flags
3techniques detected
loaded language
Headline uses 'lightning-fast speed' and 'Pro capabilities' as emotionally weighted marketing descriptors.
appeal to authority
Positioning as 'Google's latest' model implies authority and trustworthiness based on corporate brand rather than technical evidence.
flag waving
Celebratory framing of Google achievement in AI innovation without critical examination of implications or alternatives.
Solution Orientation
No data
Emotional Tone
No data
Stakeholder Voice
No data
Temporal Framing
No data
Geographic Scope
No data
Complexity
No data
Transparency
No data
Event Timeline
20 events
2026-02-26 20:01
dlq
Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model
--
2026-02-26 20:01
dlq
Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model
--
2026-02-26 20:01
eval_failure
Evaluation failed: Error: Unknown model in registry: llama-4-scout-wai
--
2026-02-26 20:01
eval_failure
Evaluation failed: Error: Unknown model in registry: llama-4-scout-wai
--
2026-02-26 19:59
dlq
Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model
--
2026-02-26 19:59
eval_failure
Evaluation failed: Error: Unknown model in registry: llama-4-scout-wai
--
2026-02-26 19:59
rate_limit
OpenRouter rate limited (429) model=llama-3.3-70b
--
2026-02-26 19:59
eval_failure
Evaluation failed: Error: Unknown model in registry: llama-4-scout-wai
--
2026-02-26 19:58
rate_limit
OpenRouter rate limited (429) model=llama-3.3-70b
--
2026-02-26 19:57
rate_limit
OpenRouter rate limited (429) model=llama-3.3-70b
--
2026-02-26 19:55
dlq
Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model
--
2026-02-26 19:53
rate_limit
OpenRouter rate limited (429) model=llama-3.3-70b
--
2026-02-26 19:52
rate_limit
OpenRouter rate limited (429) model=llama-3.3-70b
--
2026-02-26 19:51
rate_limit
OpenRouter rate limited (429) model=llama-3.3-70b
--
2026-02-26 18:41
dlq
Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model
--
2026-02-26 18:41
dlq
Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model
--
2026-02-26 18:40
dlq
Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model
--
2026-02-26 18:40
dlq
Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model
--
2026-02-26 18:39
dlq
Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model
--
2026-02-26 18:39
dlq
Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model