This article reports on a lawsuit alleging insider trading by Jane Street during Terra's $40 billion collapse, emphasizing the alleged use of non-public information to front-run trades. The content strongly engages Articles 7-8 (equal treatment and effective remedy), Article 19 (free expression and information access), and Article 21 (democratic participation), with particular focus on accountability for alleged violations of market fairness. The article advocates for transparency and legal remedy as mechanisms for protecting economic rights, though structural privacy concerns (form tracking without visible consent) create a minor tension with Article 12.
10mins is a lifetime in capital and crypto markets - I find it hard to believe that trading 10mins after the Terraform Labs swap hit the chain constitutes insider trading.
The claim of artificial price inflation with Jump sounds more questionable but TFA doesn’t seem to put it front and centre
"I am sorry. But if you go to Jump Trading and Jane Street and say “hello, I have an unregulated poorly designed mechanism that could lead to $50 billion of market value collapsing overnight, would you like to trade with me,” they are going to say yes, but their eyes are going to light up, you know? If at Time 0 you give them an extremely gameable system that can produce billions of dollars of profit, at Time 10 your system is going to be a smoking wreckage and they are going to have billions of dollars of profit. That’s their whole job, you know? I couldn’t tell you in advance what all the intermediate steps will be, and in fact in hindsight I cannot tell you what the intermediate steps actually were, how Jump and Jane Street made money off the collapse of Terra. But as a heuristic, I mean, come on. Terra was like “hello we have a balloon full of money, here is a pin, dooooooon’t pop the balloon.” Guess what!"
> Look, I am sorry. But if you go to Jump Trading and Jane Street and say “hello, I have an unregulated poorly designed mechanism that could lead to $50 billion of market value collapsing overnight, would you like to trade with me,” they are going to say yes, but their eyes are going to light up, you know? If at Time 0 you give them an extremely gameable system that can produce billions of dollars of profit, at Time 10 your system is going to be a smoking wreckage and they are going to have billions of dollars of profit. That’s their whole job, you know? I couldn’t tell you in advance what all the intermediate steps will be, and in fact in hindsight I cannot tell you what the intermediate steps actually were, how Jump and Jane Street made money off the collapse of Terra. But as a heuristic, I mean, come on. Terra was like “hello we have a balloon full of money, here is a pin, dooooooon’t pop the balloon.” Guess what!
This this this so much. Thanks for pointing it out.
> Ten minutes is not a coincidence. It is a trade.
Editorial Channel
What the content says
+0.60
Article 19Freedom of Expression
High Framing Advocacy Practice Coverage
Editorial
+0.60
SETL
+0.17
Article reports on significant financial misconduct allegations in public interest, directly advancing right to information and free expression. Clear advocacy for transparency in capital markets.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
Article headline and content describe alleged insider trading by major financial firm Jane Street.
Author clearly identified as Richardson Chinonyerem in schema markup.
No paywall or access restrictions visible; article is freely readable.
Publication date and modification date are explicit, enabling readers to assess currency.
Content is structured for search indexing and discoverability via schema.org markup.
Inferences
Public reporting on alleged financial misconduct directly advances right to receive and impart information.
Free access removes economic barriers to awareness of important financial information.
Author attribution supports accountability and credit for expression.
Transparent publication supports informed public debate about financial system integrity.
Schema markup indicates commitment to discoverability, supporting broader exercise of right to information.
+0.40
Article 10Fair Hearing
Medium Framing Advocacy
Editorial
+0.40
SETL
+0.28
Lawsuit alleges unfair proceeding (insider trading = market manipulation): article frames Jane Street's alleged conduct as violation of fair process principle. Implicit advocacy for impartial judicial review.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
Article describes a lawsuit seeking to address alleged unfair market conduct.
Coverage names the defendant and describes the legal proceeding publicly.
Publication details specific allegations in accessible language, supporting informed judicial scrutiny.
Inferences
Reporting on insider trading allegations affirms the principle of fair and impartial adjudication.
Public disclosure of lawsuit mechanics supports transparency in legal proceedings.
Article enables readers to understand standards of fair treatment alleged to have been violated.
+0.35
Article 8Right to Remedy
Medium Framing Advocacy
Editorial
+0.35
SETL
+0.23
Article advocates for legal remedy for alleged breach of market rules (insider trading), implicitly affirming right to effective judicial remedy.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
Headline emphasizes a lawsuit as the mechanism for addressing alleged misconduct.
Article details specific accusations enabling readers to understand grounds for legal action.
Publication makes information accessible to potential victims and affected parties.
Inferences
Framing of lawsuit as response to alleged misconduct implicitly affirms the right to effective remedy.
Public disclosure supports access to justice by informing stakeholders of available legal recourse.
Reporting enables readers to understand and potentially participate in legal accountability mechanisms.
+0.30
Article 7Equality Before Law
Medium Framing Advocacy
Editorial
+0.30
SETL
+0.21
Article describes a lawsuit seeking to remedy alleged unequal treatment (insider trading—a form of market manipulation that disadvantages non-privileged traders). Framing supports principle that all are equal before law.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
Lawsuit alleges Jane Street used non-public information to trade ahead of other market participants, violating equal market access.
Article names the defendant and describes the alleged violation in specific terms.
Content is publicly accessible, enabling broad audience awareness of legal action.
Inferences
Reporting on insider trading litigation supports the principle of equal legal protection by exposing alleged violations of market fairness.
Public disclosure of the suit advances transparency in pursuit of equal treatment.
Framing focuses on conduct (insider trading) rather than status, supporting Article 7's egalitarian mandate.
+0.25
Article 11Presumption of Innocence
Medium Framing Advocacy
Editorial
+0.25
SETL
+0.19
Article describes lawsuit alleging unpublicized unfair conduct by Jane Street. Implicit framing: all persons should know conduct by which they are wronged. Supports transparency and presumption of innocence (describes as 'alleged').
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
Lawsuit is described as allegations, with word 'allegedly' or similar qualifier used.
Article presents Jane Street's alleged conduct as subject to legal determination, not proven fact.
Public disclosure enables targets and affected parties to respond and defend.
Inferences
Use of 'alleged' respects presumption of innocence pending legal determination.
Public disclosure of charges affirms right to be informed of accusations.
Reporting supports transparency in legal proceedings, supporting fair public scrutiny.
+0.25
Article 28Social & International Order
Medium Framing Advocacy
Editorial
+0.25
SETL
+0.16
Article describes social order centered on justice (lawsuit as remedy for alleged misconduct); implicitly advocates for legal and social framework protecting all rights.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
Article frames lawsuit as mechanism for establishing justice and accountability.
Content supports understanding of legal protections available against market misconduct.
Reporting emphasizes rule of law (legal suit rather than extra-legal response).
Inferences
Reporting on formal legal remedy affirms commitment to rule of law as framework for justice.
Public discourse about misconduct and legal action supports social order based on rights protection.
Transparency enables public accountability and confidence in legal system.
+0.20
Article 9No Arbitrary Detention
Low Framing
Editorial
+0.20
SETL
ND
Article describes a legal case against alleged arbitrary detention-like conduct (unfair market advantage through insider information); implicitly supports protection against arbitrary state/institutional action.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
Lawsuit addresses allegedly arbitrary conduct by Jane Street (trading on non-public information without disclosure or consent from other market participants).
Article frames this as wrongful conduct subject to legal remedy.
Inferences
Reporting on insider trading allegations implicitly supports protection against arbitrary institutional conduct.
Public litigation serves as check on powerful actors' ability to act without accountability.
+0.20
Article 21Political Participation
Medium Framing Advocacy
Editorial
+0.20
SETL
+0.14
Article describes public legal action against alleged market misconduct; implicitly supports democratic principle that power is accountable to public through legal process.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
Article describes a lawsuit against a major financial actor, publicizing alleged wrongdoing.
Content is published for public awareness and informed opinion-formation.
Inferences
Transparency about legal action against corporate power supports democratic accountability.
Public reporting enables citizens to participate in informed debate about market integrity.
Comment functionality (if functional) provides mechanism for democratic engagement.
+0.15
PreamblePreamble
Medium Advocacy
Editorial
+0.15
SETL
+0.09
Article describes a lawsuit alleging corporate misconduct (insider trading by Jane Street during Terra collapse), implicitly supporting the Preamble's call for 'freedom from want and fear' through accountability and rule of law.
FW Ratio: 60%
Observable Facts
Headline announces lawsuit alleging insider trading by Jane Street in Terra's collapse.
Article is freely accessible without paywall.
Schema markup identifies this as a published news article with author attribution.
Inferences
Public disclosure of alleged financial misconduct supports the Preamble's aspirational framing of justice and accountability.
Free access enables citizens to learn about corporate wrongdoing, facilitating informed civic participation.
+0.15
Article 22Social Security
Medium Framing Advocacy
Editorial
+0.15
SETL
+0.12
Article reports on legal remedy for alleged misconduct that harmed many (Terra ecosystem participants), supporting right to social security and protection from economic harm.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
Article describes lawsuit alleging conduct that caused significant financial harm to Terra users.
Reporting emphasizes scale of impact ($40B collapse), highlighting vulnerability of affected parties.
Legal action is framed as remedy for economic harm.
Inferences
Reporting on lawsuit for market-harming conduct supports accountability for economic rights violations.
Public awareness of remedial mechanism enables affected parties to access justice.
Coverage implicitly affirms right to protection from economic exploitation.
+0.10
Article 20Assembly & Association
Low Framing
Editorial
+0.10
SETL
+0.07
Article does not explicitly discuss right of peaceful assembly, but reporting on legal action implicitly supports structured, lawful remedial mechanisms as alternative to uncontrolled protest.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
Article describes formal legal remedy (lawsuit) as mechanism for addressing alleged misconduct.
Content enables informed civic participation without promoting disruption.
Inferences
Reporting on litigation supports peaceful, lawful remedies as complement to right of assembly.
Public information access enables coordinated lawful response to misconduct allegations.
+0.10
Article 26Education
Low Framing
Editorial
+0.10
SETL
+0.07
Article is freely accessible and does not restrict participation based on ability to pay; supports educational access principle.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
No paywall or subscription required to read article.
Content is publicly available without educational barrier.
Free access removes economic barriers to financial education and awareness.
Plain-language explanation supports understanding of complex market conduct.
Public access enables all community members to learn about financial system integrity.
+0.10
Article 27Cultural Participation
Low Framing Coverage
Editorial
+0.10
SETL
+0.07
Article participates in wider cultural conversation about financial system accountability; supports right to share in cultural life.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
Article is accessible via multiple social platforms (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram linked in schema).
Headline and imagery can be shared broadly, enabling cultural discussion.
Content participates in ongoing public discourse about financial misconduct.
Inferences
Social sharing infrastructure enables broad participation in cultural conversation about market integrity.
Public reporting on major financial events supports shared cultural understanding.
Accessibility of content enables participation in evolving discourse about financial system accountability.
+0.05
Article 1Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood
Low Framing
Editorial
+0.05
SETL
0.00
Article treats all involved parties (Jane Street, plaintiffs, Terra ecosystem participants) as subjects of legal scrutiny without dehumanizing language; implicit recognition of equal dignity in legal process.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
Lawsuit describes specific alleged acts (front-running UST trades) without inflammatory characterization of individuals.
Article describes multiple stakeholders (Jane Street, plaintiffs, Terra users) in factual terms.
Inferences
Neutral descriptive language respects the dignity of all parties pending legal determination.
Reporting on legal action implicitly affirms the principle that all persons are equal before law.
0.00
Article 12Privacy
Medium Practice
Editorial
0.00
SETL
+0.15
Article content itself contains no discussion of privacy. Editorial signal is neutral.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
Page markup includes LiteSpeed cache layer and Gravity Forms tracking.
No explicit cookie consent banner or privacy opt-out visible in provided markup.
Form submission infrastructure present suggests data collection without visible consent mechanism.
Inferences
Passive data collection via caching and form tracking suggests limited transparency regarding user privacy.
Absence of visible consent mechanism indicates potential violation of privacy expectations.
Infrastructure design prioritizes efficiency over explicit user control over personal data.
0.00
Article 18Freedom of Thought
Low
Editorial
0.00
SETL
ND
Article does not discuss freedom of thought or conscience. Neutral editorial signal.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
Content is informational reporting without coercive framing or thought-control mechanisms.
Neutral reporting style supports readers' autonomy in forming views about the lawsuit.
Absence of dogmatic framing respects freedom of conscience.
0.00
Article 29Duties to Community
Low
Editorial
0.00
SETL
ND
Article does not discuss individual duties to community or reciprocal obligations. Neutral editorial signal.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
Article focuses on alleged violations of market rules, not community duties.
Content does not frame readers' responsibilities to broader community.
Inferences
Reporting on legal remedy implies reciprocal duty not to engage in insider trading.
Implicit framework recognizes both rights and corresponding duties.
-0.05
Article 2Non-Discrimination
Low Framing
Editorial
-0.05
SETL
-0.05
Content focuses on allegations against Jane Street (wealthy firm) without explicit attention to discrimination or protected characteristics; neutral framing.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
Article describes a lawsuit without mentioning race, gender, religion, or other protected characteristics.
Focus is on corporate conduct and market behavior, not identity-based discrimination.
Inferences
Article avoids identity-based framing, neither advancing nor undermining anti-discrimination principles.
Absence of attention to intersectional impacts on marginalized users of Terra suggests limited engagement with Article 2 concerns.
-0.10
Article 30No Destruction of Rights
Low Framing
Editorial
-0.10
SETL
-0.07
Article describes legal action against alleged market manipulation; implicitly affirms that rights cannot be used to destroy other rights (insider trading violates fair market access).
FW Ratio: 40%
Observable Facts
Article frames insider trading (use of information advantage) as violation of other traders' fair market access rights.
Lawsuit seeks to prevent continuation of alleged rights-violating conduct.
Inferences
Reporting implicitly supports principle that rights cannot be used to violate others' equal rights.
Legal framework described protects weaker market participants' right to fair trading from stronger actors' rights abuse.
Minor concern: page infrastructure (tracking) could enable privacy rights violations if misused, partially undermining Article 30 principle.
ND
Article 3Life, Liberty, Security
No observable discussion of right to life, personal security, or bodily integrity.
ND
Article 4No Slavery
No reference to slavery, servitude, or forced labor.
ND
Article 5No Torture
No discussion of torture or cruel/degrading treatment.
ND
Article 6Legal Personhood
No direct reference to right to recognition as person before law.
ND
Article 13Freedom of Movement
Low Practice
No discussion of freedom of movement in article content.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
Article appears to be freely accessible from any location without geographic blocking.
No IP restrictions or geo-fencing evident in page structure.
Inferences
Global accessibility of news content supports unrestricted circulation of information.
Absence of geographic barriers enables worldwide awareness of financial misconduct allegations.
ND
Article 14Asylum
No discussion of right to seek asylum or protection from persecution.
ND
Article 15Nationality
No discussion of nationality rights.
ND
Article 16Marriage & Family
No discussion of marriage, family rights, or consent.
ND
Article 17Property
Low Practice
No discussion of property rights in article content.
FW Ratio: 50%
Observable Facts
Schema markup includes 'copyrightYear' and 'copyrightHolder' fields, indicating copyright claims.
Article content is subject to copyright protection mechanisms.
Inferences
Copyright infrastructure supports creators' property rights in intellectual work.
Transparent copyright attribution enables enforcement and compensation for creators.
ND
Article 23Work & Equal Pay
No discussion of right to work, fair wages, or safe working conditions.
ND
Article 24Rest & Leisure
No discussion of right to rest, leisure, or working hours.
ND
Article 25Standard of Living
No discussion of health, medical care, or social services.
Structural Channel
What the site does
Domain Context Profile
Element
Modifier
Affects
Note
Privacy
—
No privacy policy or cookie consent mechanism visible in provided content; data concerning user tracking practices unavailable for assessment.
Terms of Service
—
Terms of service not accessible from provided page content; cannot assess contractual fairness or dispute resolution mechanisms.
Accessibility
—
No accessibility features (ARIA labels, alt text strategy, keyboard navigation) evident in provided markup; full assessment requires visual inspection.
Mission
+0.05
Article 19
Site describes itself as 'Disrupting Investment Banking,' suggesting commitment to transparent financial information; modest positive structural signal for Article 19 (free expression, information access).
Editorial Code
—
No editorial standards, corrections policy, or conflict-of-interest disclosure visible in provided content.
Ownership
—
Ownership structure not disclosed in provided content; cannot assess potential conflicts or editorial independence.
Access Model
+0.10
Article 19
Content appears freely accessible (no paywall detected in schema markup), supporting Article 19 right to information; modest positive structural modifier.
Ad/Tracking
-0.08
Article 12
LiteSpeed cache layer and form tracking scripts detected; suggests passive data collection without explicit user consent visible in provided markup, creating minor tension with Article 12 (privacy, dignity).
+0.55
Article 19Freedom of Expression
High Framing Advocacy Practice Coverage
Structural
+0.55
Context Modifier
+0.15
SETL
+0.17
Content is freely accessible (no paywall), publicly visible (published openly), attributed (author named), and indexed (schema markup). Domain context confirms free access model (modifier +0.1) and mission supporting disruption/transparency (+0.05).
+0.20
Article 8Right to Remedy
Medium Framing Advocacy
Structural
+0.20
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.23
Free public reporting on a lawsuit provides modest structural support for awareness of remedial mechanisms, though site offers no direct remedy pathways.
+0.20
Article 10Fair Hearing
Medium Framing Advocacy
Structural
+0.20
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.28
Free, transparent reporting on legal proceedings supports structural commitment to fair and public adjudication.
+0.15
Article 7Equality Before Law
Medium Framing Advocacy
Structural
+0.15
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.21
Transparent reporting on legal action against a major firm (Jane Street) provides modest structural support for equal legal protection; however, no proactive mechanisms to ensure equitable platform access.
+0.15
Article 13Freedom of Movement
Low Practice
Structural
+0.15
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
ND
Content is globally accessible (no geographic restrictions visible), providing modest structural support for unrestricted information access.
+0.15
Article 28Social & International Order
Medium Framing Advocacy
Structural
+0.15
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.16
Free public reporting on legal mechanisms supports structural commitment to rule of law.
+0.10
PreamblePreamble
Medium Advocacy
Structural
+0.10
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.09
Free access to information about financial misconduct supports the structural principle of transparent accountability, though page infrastructure itself (caching, tracking) shows mixed commitment.
+0.10
Article 11Presumption of Innocence
Medium Framing Advocacy
Structural
+0.10
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.19
Public reporting provides transparency but no structural mechanism to prevent accusation without proof.
Public reporting and comment capability (schema notes potentialAction for comments) provide modest structural support for participation in public affairs.
+0.05
Article 1Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood
Low Framing
Structural
+0.05
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
0.00
No observable barriers to access based on status, identity, or background; equal access structural support is modest.
+0.05
Article 20Assembly & Association
Low Framing
Structural
+0.05
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.07
No observable restrictions on readers assembling to discuss or act on information.
+0.05
Article 22Social Security
Medium Framing Advocacy
Structural
+0.05
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.12
Free access to information about remedial mechanism provides modest structural support; no direct social security mechanism visible on site.
+0.05
Article 26Education
Low Framing
Structural
+0.05
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.07
Free content access supports modest structural commitment to information access.
+0.05
Article 27Cultural Participation
Low Framing Coverage
Structural
+0.05
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
+0.07
Content is shared via social media infrastructure (schema markup references Facebook, Twitter, Instagram), enabling cultural participation.
0.00
Article 2Non-Discrimination
Low Framing
Structural
0.00
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.05
No observable discriminatory access or content moderation; structural signal is neutral.
0.00
Article 18Freedom of Thought
Low
Structural
0.00
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
ND
No observable structural barriers to freedom of thought; neutral signal.
0.00
Article 29Duties to Community
Low
Structural
0.00
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
ND
No observable structural enforcement of community duties or reciprocal obligations.
-0.05
Article 30No Destruction of Rights
Low Framing
Structural
-0.05
Context Modifier
0.00
SETL
-0.07
No observable structural mechanisms restricting rights exercise; potential concern that page tracking infrastructure (noted in DCP) may enable rights violations if misused.
-0.15
Article 12Privacy
Medium Practice
Structural
-0.15
Context Modifier
-0.08
SETL
+0.15
Cached domain context notes LiteSpeed caching and form tracking scripts without explicit user consent disclosure, creating tension with privacy rights.
ND
Article 3Life, Liberty, Security
No structural mechanisms visible bearing on physical security.
ND
Article 4No Slavery
No structural signals regarding labor coercion or exploitation.
ND
Article 5No Torture
No structural mechanisms bearing on prohibition of torture.
ND
Article 6Legal Personhood
No structural barriers to legal recognition evident.
ND
Article 9No Arbitrary Detention
Low Framing
No observable structural mechanisms bearing on arrest or detention.
ND
Article 14Asylum
No structural mechanisms bearing on asylum or refugee protection.
ND
Article 15Nationality
No structural barriers based on nationality evident.
ND
Article 16Marriage & Family
No structural mechanisms bearing on family law or consent.
ND
Article 23Work & Equal Pay
No observable labor practice information or mechanisms.
ND
Article 24Rest & Leisure
No observable restrictions or enforcement of work hours.
ND
Article 25Standard of Living
No health or medical information or mechanisms visible.
Supplementary Signals
Epistemic Quality
0.56medium claims
Sources
0.5
Evidence
0.5
Uncertainty
0.7
Purpose
0.7
Propaganda Flags
2techniques detected
loaded language
'Lawsuit Bombshell' in image title suggests dramatic framing of legal action rather than neutral reporting.
appeal to fear
Headline emphasizes '$40B' collapse scale and 'Bombshell' terminology, potentially triggering concern about market stability.
Solution Orientation
0.47mixed
Reader Agency
0.3
Emotional Tone
urgent
Valence
-0.3
Arousal
0.7
Dominance
0.4
Stakeholder Voice
0.253 perspectives
About: corporationindividualsinstitution
Temporal Framing
presentshort term
Geographic Scope
global
United States
Complexity
moderatemedium jargongeneral
Transparency
0.33
✓ Author✗ Conflicts✗ Funding
Event Timeline
20 events
2026-02-26 02:15
dlq
Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Jane Street Hit with Terra $40B Insider Trading Suit
--
2026-02-26 02:15
dlq
Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Jane Street Hit with Terra $40B Insider Trading Suit
--
2026-02-26 02:15
eval_success
Evaluated: Mild positive (0.17)
--
2026-02-26 02:14
dlq
Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Jane Street Hit with Terra $40B Insider Trading Suit
--
2026-02-26 02:13
eval_success
Evaluated: Mild positive (0.21)
--
2026-02-26 02:13
dlq
Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Jane Street Hit with Terra $40B Insider Trading Suit
--
2026-02-26 02:13
dlq
Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Jane Street Hit with Terra $40B Insider Trading Suit
--
2026-02-26 02:12
eval_success
Evaluated: Mild positive (0.22)
--
2026-02-26 02:12
dlq
Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Jane Street Hit with Terra $40B Insider Trading Suit
--
2026-02-26 02:12
dlq
Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Jane Street Hit with Terra $40B Insider Trading Suit
--
2026-02-26 02:12
eval_success
Evaluated: Neutral (0.31)
--
2026-02-26 02:11
dlq
Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Jane Street Hit with Terra $40B Insider Trading Suit
--
2026-02-26 02:11
dlq
Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Jane Street Hit with Terra $40B Insider Trading Suit
--
2026-02-26 02:11
dlq
Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Jane Street Hit with Terra $40B Insider Trading Suit
--
2026-02-26 02:11
eval_success
Evaluated: Neutral (0.34)
--
2026-02-26 02:11
dlq
Dead-lettered after 1 attempts: Jane Street Hit with Terra $40B Insider Trading Suit