The preprint exemplifies Article 19 protections: authors freely express findings, methodology, code, and caveats. No self-censorship or editorial pressure. Information is imparted in plain language with detailed supporting evidence.

The research directly contributes to scientific progress in machine learning. Open release of code and models enables the global community to share in and build upon this advancement.

The preprint directly supports Article 26 through detailed documentation (abstract, methodology, figures, tables, code). Educational value is maximized through transparency and reproducibility. Open access enables learning regardless of institutional access.

The research contributes to collective scientific progress and economic understanding of ML systems. Publication enables global access to knowledge that supports social/economic development.

The paper takes responsibility for scientific rigor: testing assumptions thoroughly, releasing code for verification, and reporting limitations. Authors acknowledge both positive findings and caveats, supporting informed community judgment.

The abstract exemplifies open scientific inquiry—questioning assumptions about LoRA merging effectiveness, publishing negative/null results, and releasing code/checkpoints. This supports the Preamble's commitment to 'universal respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms' through transparent, reproducible science.

The methodology treats all LoRAs equally in the pool and tests even randomly initialized variants, refusing to bias toward 'reputable' or elite contributions. This operationalizes equal protection in empirical practice.

The study uses publicly available, non-personal data (model parameters) and discloses no involvement of human subjects or private information. Methodology is transparent, enabling privacy auditing.

The preprint enables global scientific circulation. Authors, readers, and derivative researchers can move findings across borders without restriction.

Authors maintain intellectual property while voluntarily releasing code and checkpoints under open terms. This respects property rights while enabling community benefit.

The research emerges from scientific collaboration (6 co-authors) without restriction. Open-source code release enables future collaborative communities.

The paper acknowledges all contributors by name and affiliation, recognizing each as an intellectual agent. Reproducibility practices (code release, data disclosure) extend recognition to future researchers building on this work.

The paper directly challenges prior work's claims about LoRA merging benefits, providing detailed evidence (24 pages, 14 figures, 5 tables) to support alternative conclusions. This serves as a form of scientific remedy against overstated prior claims.

The preprint invites community scrutiny through transparent methodology, data release, and open code. Authors present both positive findings and limitations, enabling readers to form independent judgments.

Not directly applicable to a machine learning preprint, but open scientific publication creates structural space for persecuted researchers to disseminate findings.

The paper lists authors with institutional affiliations but does not address nationality explicitly. Scientific authorship implicitly grants recognition within the research community.

The paper questions widely-held assumptions about LoRA merging effectiveness without self-censorship. Authors present evidence that contradicts prior consensus, demonstrating freedom to think differently.

Authors are recognized for their labor (named authorship). Open publication provides credit and visibility that supports scientific career advancement.

The research contributes to global scientific understanding that supports informed decision-making about AI systems—critical infrastructure for rights-respecting governance.

The research engages with a democratized model ecosystem (Hugging Face Hub), where non-elite researchers can contribute and access tools. This reflects commitment to equality in scientific participation rather than gatekeeping.

The paper systematically tests hypotheses rather than assuming guilt/fault. It questions prior claims through evidence rather than assertion, respecting the principle that claims require proof.

The work does not explicitly address discrimination, but its methodology—aggregating diverse community contributions without filtering by researcher identity—implicitly treats all sources equally.

The preprint does not restrict interpretation to support human rights—it permits all readings, including those that might misappropriate findings. No explicit prohibition on rights-violating interpretations is visible.

arXiv's commitment to preprint transparency and author identification (full author list provided, submission history visible) enables accountability and verification. No anonymity that would obscure responsible parties for scientific claims.

No observable content related to slavery or servitude.

No content addressing torture or cruel treatment.

No content related to arrest or detention.

No content related to marriage or family.

No content related to political participation or public affairs.

No observable content related to rest or leisure.

No content addressing health, food, or welfare.

arXiv's core mission directly implements Article 19—free, open dissemination of scientific information without paywalls, geographic restrictions, or censorship. Global accessibility enables borderless information flow. Metadata system (keywords, categories) facilitates discovery without suppression.

arXiv's open-access infrastructure is designed to maximize scientific progress sharing. No paywalls, no proprietary restrictions, no geographic barriers prevent global participation in advancement. Model checkpoints and code release extend sharing to practical implementation level.

arXiv's open-access model removes all financial barriers to education. Multiple formats (PDF, HTML, TeX) support diverse learning styles and technical capabilities. arXiv's mission explicitly supports free dissemination of scientific knowledge (cached DCP: access_model modifier +0.12).

arXiv minimizes user tracking (cached DCP: ad_tracking modifier +0.03). Content is publicly archived without commercial surveillance. Open-access model does not require personal data for access.

arXiv's archival system establishes dated, timestamped ownership and provenance. Code release typically uses permissive licenses (CC, MIT, Apache) that respect both creator rights and user rights.

arXiv's open-access model removes economic barriers to knowledge access. Free availability supports researchers in under-resourced institutions and developing regions.

arXiv's open-access infrastructure enables global participation in scientific discourse without paywalls or proprietary restrictions. The ability to access, cite, and build upon this work exemplifies structural support for universal dignity through knowledge sharing.

arXiv's submission system treats all researchers identically regardless of past publication record, institutional prestige, or citation count. No special review lanes for 'elite' submitters.

arXiv's preprint model enables rapid response and counter-evidence publication without gatekeeping by journal editors. Code/data release enables independent verification of grievances against prior work.

arXiv's open-access infrastructure operates globally without national borders. Content is accessible from any jurisdiction with internet access; no geofencing or movement restrictions.

arXiv enables researchers to discover and build upon shared work. Open-access model supports formation of collaborative communities around shared interests without proprietary barriers.

arXiv's commitment to preprint transparency and author identification (full author list provided, submission history visible) enables accountability and verification. No anonymity that would obscure responsible parties for scientific claims.

arXiv's metadata system captures author names, affiliations, and submission history, creating permanent attribution records. DOI and citation tools further solidify personhood recognition in the scientific record.

arXiv's public infrastructure allows any researcher to evaluate, critique, and validate claims. No paywalls prevent access to evidence needed for fair judgment.

arXiv's non-selective architecture allows authors from any jurisdiction to publish without discrimination. No content-based rejection based on author nationality or status.

arXiv archives do not require national identity verification; authors can publish regardless of citizenship status. Affiliation recognition operates on professional rather than national basis.

arXiv's non-editorial approach respects diverse scientific viewpoints. No content-based rejection based on theoretical disagreement with prior work.

arXiv's archival system creates permanent records of intellectual contribution, enabling career recognition independent of institutional gatekeeping. No exclusive employment arrangements restrict authors' right to work.

arXiv operates as a global commons supporting international scientific order. Cornell University stewardship and non-profit model provide institutional stability for rights-respecting knowledge infrastructure (cached DCP: ownership modifier +0.05).

arXiv's transparency requirements (author identification, timestamping, method disclosure) enable community accountability. Open code release enables verification of claims, supporting collective responsibility.

arXiv's non-profit open-access structure treats all researchers equally regardless of institutional affiliation or resource level. No paywalls or subscription barriers enforce hierarchical access.

arXiv's preprint system does not prejudge content; submissions are published with standard disclosure that they are un-peer-reviewed. Readers can form independent judgments.

arXiv does not require institutional affiliation or status verification; contributions are evaluated on content quality. Access is universal regardless of personal characteristics.

arXiv provides no health services; standard archival platform.

arXiv's author agreement permits commercial use of preprints under standard academic terms; no contractual servitude.

Standard academic preprint repository; no detention mechanisms.

Standard preprint platform; no family-related restrictions or protections.

Standard preprint platform; no political participation mechanisms.

arXiv's open-access model permits any use consistent with academic norms. No technical restrictions prevent misuse or rights-violating applications of released code.

Standard preprint repository terms pose no structural risk of abuse.

Preprint platform imposes no restrictions on rest or leisure.