Privacy policy not evaluated; domain metadata insufficient for privacy signal assessment.
Terms of Service
—
Terms of service not accessible from provided content.
Accessibility
—
Accessibility features present in HTML structure but insufficient for modifier assignment.
Mission
-0.15
Article 19 Article 20
Official government domain (whitehouse.gov) publishing media criticism framed as 'Media Offenders' suggests potential use of state authority to target press freedom. Moderate negative modifier applied to press/expression articles.
Editorial Code
—
No editorial standards code detected.
Ownership
-0.10
Article 2 Article 19
Content originates from executive branch official website; potential for authority bias in framing of media entities as 'offenders.' Minor negative modifier.
Access Model
+0.05
Article 19
Public access to media criticism tracker suggests transparency intent; marginal positive modifier.
Ad/Tracking
—
Parsely analytics DNS present; insufficient signal for scoring.
Score Breakdown
-0.37
PreamblePreamble
Medium Framing Advocacy
Editorial
-0.35
Structural
-0.15
SETL
-0.26
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Content frames media outlets as 'offenders' subject to state scrutiny, undermining foundational UDHR principles of dignity, freedom, and non-discrimination. Framing suggests use of executive authority to delegitimize press.
Observable Facts
Page title explicitly names 'Media Offenders' rather than neutral descriptors.
Meta description references 'Hall of Shame for serial offenders' and 'Leaderboard of networks ranked by Repeated Lies.'
Content originates from official White House domain (whitehouse.gov).
Page includes feature for tracking media entities with apparent ranking/shaming mechanism.
Inferences
The 'Hall of Shame' framing suggests public condemnation of media entities by state authority, which may chill press freedom.
State-sponsored tracking of media 'offenders' raises concerns about potential instrumentalization of government power against press entities.
-0.42
Article 1Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood
Medium Framing Advocacy
Editorial
-0.40
Structural
-0.20
SETL
-0.28
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Content categorizes media organizations as moral/legal offenders, contradicting Article 1's principle of equal dignity and respect for all persons and organizations.
Observable Facts
Page explicitly categorizes media outlets as 'offenders' in title and description.
Mechanism ranks networks by 'Repeated Lies,' assigning moral/factual judgment to specific entities.
Inferences
Ranking and shaming mechanism may violate the equal dignity principle by singling out media for public censure.
-0.54
Article 2Non-Discrimination
High Framing Advocacy
Editorial
-0.45
Structural
-0.30
SETL
-0.26
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
State-sponsored distinction and ranking of media entities by factual performance may constitute discrimination based on editorial stance or institutional identity.
Observable Facts
Content originates from executive branch; government entity applying categorization to private media organizations.
Page ranks media networks by performance metrics; some media are named as 'offenders' while others are not.
State authority is used to publicly distinguish and track specific media entities.
Inferences
Selective application of 'offender' label by state authority to specific media outlets constitutes a form of institutional discrimination.
Potential chilling effect on media organizations not aligned with current administration's preferred narratives.
ND
Article 3Life, Liberty, Security
ND
No observable content related to security or liberty of persons.
ND
Article 4No Slavery
ND
No content addressing slavery or servitude.
ND
Article 5No Torture
ND
No content addressing torture or cruel/inhuman punishment.
ND
Article 6Legal Personhood
ND
No content related to legal personhood.
ND
Article 7Equality Before Law
ND
No observable content related to legal equality before law.
ND
Article 8Right to Remedy
ND
No content addressing remedies for rights violations.
ND
Article 9No Arbitrary Detention
ND
No content on arbitrary arrest/detention.
ND
Article 10Fair Hearing
ND
No observable content related to fair trial/due process.
ND
Article 11Presumption of Innocence
ND
No content on criminal responsibility or presumption of innocence.
ND
Article 12Privacy
ND
No observable content related to privacy, family, or correspondence.
ND
Article 13Freedom of Movement
ND
No content on freedom of movement.
ND
Article 14Asylum
ND
No content on asylum or refugee rights.
ND
Article 15Nationality
ND
No content on nationality rights.
ND
Article 16Marriage & Family
ND
No content on marriage or family.
ND
Article 17Property
ND
No content on property rights.
ND
Article 18Freedom of Thought
ND
No observable content on freedom of conscience/religion.
-0.59
Article 19Freedom of Expression
High Framing Advocacy Practice
Editorial
-0.50
Structural
-0.35
SETL
-0.27
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Content directly targets media organizations' exercise of press freedom through state-sponsored fact-checking and public shaming. Establishment of 'Hall of Shame' and 'Leaderboard' by executive authority constitutes potential interference with Article 19 freedoms.
Observable Facts
Page title explicitly frames media entities as 'Offenders' subject to state evaluation.
Meta description describes 'Hall of Shame for serial offenders' and 'Leaderboard of networks ranked by Repeated Lies.'
Content is published by U.S. executive branch (White House) official website.
The tracker categorizes and ranks media outlets by factual performance, creating public record of state designation.
Inferences
State-sponsored tracking and shaming of media organizations may chill press freedom by creating reputational risk for reporting the executive disfavors.
Use of executive authority to publicly categorize media outlets as 'offenders' may be perceived as intimidation or coercion, conflicting with Article 19's protection of press independence.
Public ranking mechanism suggests potential preference for media alignment with executive positions over editorial independence.
-0.41
Article 20Assembly & Association
Medium Framing Advocacy
Editorial
-0.30
Structural
-0.20
SETL
-0.17
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
While assembly/association of individuals is not directly restricted, content demonstrates state apparatus targeting media organizations (collective bodies), which may discourage formation of independent media associations.
Observable Facts
Content targets specific media organizations (collective entities) for public categorization and ranking.
State authority is used to publicly evaluate institutional media actors.
Inferences
Public designation of media organizations as 'offenders' by state may discourage formation or independence of media associations.
State ranking mechanism may suppress willingness of media entities to band together or operate independently from executive preferences.
ND
Article 21Political Participation
ND
No observable content on political participation or democratic processes.
ND
Article 22Social Security
ND
No content on social security or welfare rights.
ND
Article 23Work & Equal Pay
ND
No content on labor rights.
ND
Article 24Rest & Leisure
ND
No content on rest/leisure.
ND
Article 25Standard of Living
ND
No observable content on food, health, or standard of living.
ND
Article 26Education
ND
No content on education.
ND
Article 27Cultural Participation
ND
No observable content on cultural/scientific participation.
ND
Article 28Social & International Order
ND
No content on social/international order.
ND
Article 29Duties to Community
ND
No observable content on duties or limitations.
ND
Article 30No Destruction of Rights
ND
No content on interpretation/limitation of rights.