Article Heatmap
Preamble: +0.20 — Preamble P Article 1: +0.10 — Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood 1 Article 2: -0.20 — Non-Discrimination 2 Article 3: +0.05 — Life, Liberty, Security 3 Article 4: ND — No Slavery Article 4: No Data — No Slavery 4 Article 5: ND — No Torture Article 5: No Data — No Torture 5 Article 6: +0.15 — Legal Personhood 6 Article 7: +0.14 — Equality Before Law 7 Article 8: +0.08 — Right to Remedy 8 Article 9: ND — No Arbitrary Detention Article 9: No Data — No Arbitrary Detention 9 Article 10: +0.26 — Fair Hearing 10 Article 11: +0.06 — Presumption of Innocence 11 Article 12: -0.21 — Privacy 12 Article 13: +0.28 — Freedom of Movement 13 Article 14: +0.15 — Asylum 14 Article 15: +0.08 — Nationality 15 Article 16: +0.11 — Marriage & Family 16 Article 17: +0.08 — Property 17 Article 18: +0.31 — Freedom of Thought 18 Article 19: +0.44 — Freedom of Expression 19 Article 20: +0.23 — Assembly & Association 20 Article 21: +0.17 — Political Participation 21 Article 22: +0.06 — Social Security 22 Article 23: +0.05 — Work & Equal Pay 23 Article 24: +0.02 — Rest & Leisure 24 Article 25: -0.06 — Standard of Living 25 Article 26: +0.14 — Education 26 Article 27: +0.21 — Cultural Participation 27 Article 28: +0.10 — Social & International Order 28 Article 29: -0.08 — Duties to Community 29 Article 30: -0.14 — No Destruction of Rights 30
Aggregates
Weighted Mean +0.08 Unweighted Mean +0.09 Max +0.44 Article 19 Min -0.21 Article 12 Signal 25 No Data 6 Confidence ND Volatility 0.24 (Medium) Negative 4 Channels E: 0.4 S: 0.6 SETL -0.01 Structural-dominant FW Ratio 63% 0 facts · 0 inferences
Evidence: High: 1 Medium: 11 Low: 13 No Data: 6
Theme Radar
Foundation Security Legal Privacy & Movement Personal Expression Economic & Social Cultural Order & Duties Foundation: 0.03 (3 articles) Security: 0.05 (1 articles) Legal: 0.14 (5 articles) Privacy & Movement: 0.08 (4 articles) Personal: 0.17 (3 articles) Expression: 0.28 (3 articles) Economic & Social: 0.02 (4 articles) Cultural: 0.17 (2 articles) Order & Duties: -0.04 (3 articles) Domain Context Profile
Element Modifier Affects Note Privacy +0.05 Article 12
Meta referrer tag present; no obvious tracking pixels in page content; minimal telemetry signals observable Terms of Service —
Terms of Service link visible in footer; no violations observable on this page Accessibility -0.08 Article 2 Article 25
HTML structure lacks ARIA labels, semantic landmarks, and alt text; minimal accessibility features observable Mission +0.10 Article 19
Community-driven news platform with open discussion ethos; supports free exchange of information Editorial Code —
Community moderation guidelines link present; editorial standards applied through community voting Ownership —
Y Combinator ownership; no observable corporate speech restrictions on individual submissions Access Model +0.12 Article 19 Article 25
Free, open access to platform without registration barrier; community participation accessible to all Ad/Tracking -0.03 Article 12
Minimal observable advertising; no third-party tracking pixels detected in page source
Score Breakdown
+0.20
Low Practice
Platform structure enables human dignity through open discourse; no observable barriers to participation based on status
Observable Facts
Page contains login link allowing user authentication, but does not require login to view content Community voting and discussion mechanisms are visible and accessible Inferences
The open-access model suggests structural support for equal participation regardless of background +0.10
Article 1 Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood
Low Practice
Community platform structured to treat submissions and commenters as equals in voting; no visible discrimination signals
Observable Facts
All submissions receive identical formatting and voting mechanisms regardless of submitter identity No visible restrictions on who can submit or comment based on personal characteristics Inferences
Equal structural treatment suggests commitment to non-discriminatory participation -0.20
Article 2 Non-Discrimination
Medium Practice
Accessibility barriers present; limited accommodation for users with disabilities observable in page structure
Observable Facts
HTML lacks ARIA attributes, alt text for images, semantic navigation landmarks, and structured heading hierarchy Vote buttons use only visual cues (arrows) without text labels or descriptions Textarea for comment submission lacks explicit label association Inferences
Absence of accessibility features creates structural discrimination against users relying on assistive technology The design does not accommodate diverse human needs for equal participation +0.05
Article 3 Life, Liberty, Security
Low Practice
No observable threats to user security or life; standard web platform without safety risks
Observable Facts
Page uses HTTPS canonical URL and standard HTML security headers (referrer policy) Inferences
Basic security infrastructure present suggests minimal risk to user safety ND
No observable slavery or servitude signals; not applicable to this content type
ND
No observable torture or cruel treatment signals; not applicable to this content type
+0.15
Article 6 Legal Personhood
Low Practice
Platform recognizes users as legal persons through user accounts and attribution system
Observable Facts
Submissions are attributed to individual user accounts (e.g., 'PrateekJ17'), granting each submission legal attribution Users have profile pages and account-based rights (voting, commenting, favorites) Inferences
User account system implicitly recognizes individuals as legal entities with rights and responsibilities +0.14
Article 7 Equality Before Law
Low Practice
Platform operates with consistent rules and transparent voting mechanism applied equally to all submissions
Observable Facts
All submissions subject to identical voting, hiding, and discussion mechanisms Community guidelines link visible in footer, establishing enforceable norms Scoring system publicly visible and consistent across all submissions Inferences
Transparent, uniform application of rules suggests equal protection under platform governance +0.08
Article 8 Right to Remedy
Low Practice
Platform provides dispute resolution through moderation and community feedback; limited evidence of remedial mechanisms
Observable Facts
Hide, flag, and community voting mechanisms provide user tools to address problematic content Moderation guidelines link visible suggesting formal review process Inferences
Multiple feedback channels suggest structural support for addressing rights violations ND
Article 9 No Arbitrary Detention
No observable arbitrary detention or arrest mechanisms; not applicable to platform
+0.26
Medium Practice Advocacy
Platform structure provides forum for fair and public hearing; open commenting system allows due process-like participation
Observable Facts
Public discussion mechanism allows submission authors and readers to respond and defend positions Comment threads visible and searchable, providing transparent record of discourse No evidence of arbitrary removal of submissions without visibility of decision Inferences
Transparent commenting system and public visibility of submissions enable fair hearing of ideas Community-driven moderation allows collective judgment rather than unilateral authority +0.06
Article 11 Presumption of Innocence
Low Practice
Platform presumes user innocence through community voting; accusation requires peer support to gain visibility
Observable Facts
Negative voting mechanism does not permanently remove content; controversial submissions remain visible Voting is transparent and cumulative, requiring consensus rather than unilateral judgment Inferences
Presupposition of community review before action suggests innocence-until-proven model -0.21
Medium Practice
User data collection and privacy protections unclear; referrer policy present but limited transparency on data handling
Observable Facts
Page contains meta referrer tag indicating origin-based referral policy JavaScript files loaded (hn.js) which may collect analytics but content not inspectable from HTML No visible privacy policy or data processing disclosure on this page Inferences
Absence of privacy disclosure on page suggests potential gaps in communicating data practices to users Third-party JavaScript may enable tracking beyond what is directly observable +0.28
Article 13 Freedom of Movement
Medium Practice Advocacy
Platform enables freedom of movement across content and access to global information without geographic restriction
Observable Facts
Content accessible without geographic login barriers visible on page Navigation links allow movement between sections (newest, past, comments, ask, show, jobs) External link to replay (coasty.ai) demonstrates cross-domain information access Inferences
Open access architecture enables circulation of information without nationality-based restrictions +0.15
Low Practice
Platform accessible regardless of origin; no visible national or status-based exclusions from participation
Observable Facts
No geographic login requirements or nationality-based access restrictions visible User accounts appear to be global (no country-specific limitations observable) Inferences
Absence of national origin-based discrimination suggests support for asylum seekers and all persons +0.08
Low Practice
User account system allows acquisition of platform nationality/membership; no statelessness within platform
Observable Facts
Account creation available (login link visible) enabling membership in platform community Users attributed to accounts (e.g., PrateekJ17) gain status and rights within system Inferences
Account system enables acquisition of community standing and associated rights +0.11
Article 16 Marriage & Family
Low Practice
Platform enables expression of thought and family-related topics; limited structural constraints on personal relationship discussion
Observable Facts
Comment system allows discussion of any topic including personal relationships No visible restrictions on content related to marriage, family, or personal choice Inferences
Open discussion space permits expression of views on intimate family matters +0.08
Low Practice
User accounts provide property-like rights (favorites, saved items); limited observable protection mechanisms
Observable Facts
Favorite button allows users to accumulate and retain personal collection of posts User accounts persist, enabling retention of reputation scores and contribution history Inferences
Account persistence and personalization features suggest minimal recognition of personal property rights in user data +0.31
Article 18 Freedom of Thought
Medium Advocacy Practice
Platform explicitly enables freedom of thought and conscience through open discussion space; submission content shows abstract ideas and analysis
Observable Facts
Submission discusses AI technology ('Computer Using agent'), a matter of intellectual debate Comment form allows users to express thoughts and disagreement without pre-publication review visible No content filters or ideology-based restrictions observable on discussion topics Inferences
Open technical discussion without pre-filtering suggests platform supports freedom of conscience and thought Absence of editorial gatekeeping on ideological grounds enables expression of diverse viewpoints +0.44
Article 19 Freedom of Expression
High Advocacy Practice
Core platform function enables freedom of expression; structural and editorial design prioritizes information sharing and public discourse
Observable Facts
Primary page function is display of user-submitted story with public title and description Comment section enables discussion and response to published content Voting system allows community judgment without pre-publication censorship Navigation menu includes 'submit' link inviting new submissions No visible content filters preventing publication of user speech on technical topics Inferences
Platform architecture centers on receiving, amplifying, and discussing user-generated content Minimal editorial gatekeeping before publication suggests protection of expression rights Public attribution (username, timestamp) enables identification of speaker and accountability +0.23
Article 20 Assembly & Association
Medium Practice Advocacy
Platform enables peaceful assembly through discussion threads and community formation; structural support for collective participation
Observable Facts
Comment and discussion mechanisms enable gathering of multiple participants around shared topics Community voting allows collective action and shared judgment No visible restrictions on topic-based discussion or community formation Inferences
Discussion thread architecture enables peaceful assembly of people around ideas Collective voting mechanism facilitates shared decision-making characteristic of association +0.17
Article 21 Political Participation
Low Practice
Community voting provides input into platform governance; limited evidence of direct participation in formal policy-making
Observable Facts
Voting mechanism allows users to influence content visibility and platform discourse direction Guidelines and moderation policies linked in footer, suggesting community can provide feedback Inferences
Voting system approximates democratic participation in content governance +0.06
Article 22 Social Security
Low Practice
Platform provides minimal social and economic security; no observable benefits for health, employment, or welfare
Observable Facts
Jobs section link visible in navigation, enabling job market access Community discussion may provide informal knowledge sharing and networking Inferences
Job posting section suggests limited structural support for economic participation +0.05
Article 23 Work & Equal Pay
Low Practice
Platform enables discussion of work and labor; limited structural support for labor rights enforcement
Observable Facts
Jobs section in navigation indicates platform enables labor market discussion Discussion threads could address work conditions and labor issues Inferences
Open discussion space permits expression of labor-related ideas without restriction +0.02
Article 24 Rest & Leisure
Low Practice
No observable support for rest and leisure; not addressed in platform structure
Observable Facts
Platform enables flexible participation without mandatory engagement Inferences
Non-coercive participation model permits users to determine own engagement frequency -0.06
Article 25 Standard of Living
Low Practice
Platform accessible without payment; accessibility barriers limit equal participation in standard of living discussions
Observable Facts
Free access without subscription or payment requirement Accessibility barriers (lack of alt text, ARIA labels) prevent equal participation by users with disabilities Inferences
Accessibility gaps undermine equal opportunity to participate in social and economic discourse +0.14
Medium Practice Advocacy
Platform enables education and development through information sharing and technical discussion; limited formal educational structure
Observable Facts
Content discusses technical achievement ('CAPTCHA solving'), enabling knowledge dissemination Discussion and comment mechanisms enable learning from community expertise Replay link (coasty.ai/share) provides concrete educational resource for understanding AI capabilities Inferences
Discussion-based architecture enables peer learning and skill development Technical focus supports informal education in emerging technologies +0.21
Article 27 Cultural Participation
Medium Advocacy Practice
Platform enables participation in cultural and scientific life; submission discusses technical advancement with global relevance
Observable Facts
Submission shares scientific/technical advancement (AI capability) with community Discussion of abstract achievement (Level 6 CAPTCHA solving) represents intellectual and scientific contribution Community voting recognizes and amplifies scientific discussion Inferences
Platform structure enables sharing and discussion of scientific progress Recognition of intellectual achievement through voting suggests valuation of creative and scientific contribution +0.10
Article 28 Social & International Order
Low Practice
Platform structured to enable peaceful resolution of disputes through moderation and community feedback; limited formal mechanisms
Observable Facts
Hide, flag, and voting mechanisms provide tools for addressing problematic content Moderation guidelines link suggests formal dispute resolution process Public discussion enables explanation and response to accusations Inferences
Multi-layered feedback mechanisms suggest commitment to peaceful rather than punitive content governance -0.08
Article 29 Duties to Community
Medium Practice
Platform enables expression but lacks explicit framework for balancing individual rights with community responsibilities; responsibilities not clearly articulated
Observable Facts
Community guidelines link visible but specific duty framework not detailed on this page Voting and moderation mechanisms exist but lack transparent explanation of responsibility standards Inferences
Absence of explicit statement of user responsibilities and community duties suggests incomplete rights-responsibilities framework Implicit moderation standards may apply inconsistently or opaquely -0.14
Article 30 No Destruction of Rights
Medium Framing
Platform structure does not explicitly prevent interpretation of rights that could undermine UDHR; no safeguarding language visible
Observable Facts
No explicit statement limiting interpretation of platform rights to UDHR standards Community guidelines not fully detailed on this page to assess protective language Inferences
Absence of explicit safeguarding language against misuse of platform for rights violations suggests potential interpretive gap Platform could be used to coordinate activity harmful to UDHR without visible countermeasures