The URL returned HTTP 401 Unauthorized and displayed only a captcha challenge, rendering the article content inaccessible for evaluation. Observable structural signals indicate access barriers (JavaScript requirement, captcha gate, ad blocker restrictions) and privacy tracking infrastructure that conflict with the domain's established editorial mission to provide public information access. The evaluation is substantially limited to domain-level patterns and access barriers rather than article-specific content.
I can’t imagine how any country would think the US is trustworthy enough to be the place where everyone stores their data. If companies cannot comply with data sovereignty laws then they shouldn’t exist at all. Personally, even as a US citizen, I’m hoping tech companies in Europe and Asia become independent enough to no longer be beholden to US interests. It’s clear that the era where any one country has global hegemony should end.
Sigh. Anecdotally, more Europeans no longer want their governments to rely on software and data controlled by US companies, because they no longer trust the US to act as a reliable ally, defending the same values. Whether you agree or disagree with these concerns, they are valid for many Europeans.
In an ironic twist of fate, the US government's actions could end up causing long-term damage to US tech companies.
This is all based on anecdotal evidence, so I could be wrong, but I have to call it like I see it.
We are pivoting out of a huge number of US services at my job. I think windows, Google, PaloAltoNetworks and Aws will be the last we leave, but infoblox is out next year (that's part of my job right now), and old Cisco hardware will stop being replaced by new Cisco hardware in 6 months.
I bet it’s too late now. They will need very very persuasive arguments to kill all the initiatives, and while they may convince some governments and lobbying groups, I doubt they will manage to convince every IT responsible.
It's not even just data stored on US servers. According to the CLOUD Act, any data stored by a US company, regardless of location, can be demanded by any authority in the US.
No sovereign nation should use US companies for data storage or processing. Period.
The attempts to shift to open source or non-US services are inevitably hobbled by US companies lobbying (read: bribing) politicians.
The shame of all this is that now every country will have a worse, more expensive - but yes, soveriegn - solution, and the US makes less money through trade. Everyone loses, except people who want to hurt western economies.
Similarly, in the 2000s, the US pushed back against the development of Galileo and preferred that Europe continue relying on GPS. That created tensions between the US and the EU.
Fighting data sovereignty is a losing battle for the US: data are too strategic to outsource, even to allies.
It's difficult to imagine the US diplomats themselves have any real levers to pull here. The bridges have already been quite burned, and any attempt at a carrot or a stick may just speed up countries' data sovereignty initiates.
And in related news, major European democracies are spending real money architecting sovereign cloud tech - planning on replacing not just the infra, but also the key parts of commonly used SaaS stacks. (How do I know? I got a job offer from one of those governments to help them architect that; exciting times).
> the U.S. strongly supports cross-border data flows that promote growth and innovation while protecting privacy, safety, and free expression
Yeah that will be a hard no from me. They're not exactly known for their positive attitude towards privacy. And free speech seems to depend on who's aligned with the administration.
I hope that the EU becomes a real innovation center of decentralized tech initiatives. There are all these tech movements like local-first apps, atproto/activitypub, and self-hosting that could be absolutely supercharged by both the user and developer base of Europe flat out rejecting big tech cloud platforming.
I ask the question: Is it human comprehendible data that has the value?
So would this issue still exist if the data was not human comprehendible yet a system still functioned 100% as needed?
The outlier technologists among us may read between my written lines with piquéd interest while the majority will likely just balk making claims based on lack of knowledge and awareness. For those looking to balk save your time in responding because analogously we no longer drive Ford Model Ts either and in time so too will system designs significantly change to answer the issues created by todays limited technology architectures.
Whether it be in the water you drink, the air you breath, or the technology platforms you rely on; What you cannot see matters most!
US 'diplomats' are campaigns big donors, or primary supports. I've eaten with someone who expected to be named diplomat in Europe because he supported Obama by 2007, but was one-uped by a richer donor post-primary.
This administration really, truly lives under the delusion that they hold "all the cards". In every engagement they think it is for them to dictate and everyone else to follow. Any graciousness they show is just kind benevolence.
And the "diplomats" of this administration is a rogues gallery of Epstein associates (e.g. pedophile sex-trafficking garbage) and self-dealing criminals. Just a who's-who of garbage.
They are sending their absolute worst.
Americans are just blissfully unaware how much their country is being destroyed. It's staggering stuff. Even if you're a super conservative, there should be utter embarrassment and outrage about how incompetent and clownish this parade of imbeciles is.
At the end of the day it isn't US tech companies that'd suffer (outside some minor short term pain) it's the US. If being in America is bad for business those companies (which already exist multi-nationally in most cases) will just pack up their US holdings.
The US ambassador to France has just had his access to parliamentarians and members of the government withdrawn because he is trying to turn a neo-Nazi who died in a fight into a political martyr. There are similar situations in Belgium and Poland.
American diplomats have been doing Trump's dirty work for a some time.
I am more concerned about US interference in elections and campaigning for the far right than lobbying for data at the moment.
I do not trust anyone with my data. This is just my preference but every year I move further and further away from using the internet for anything other than making comments on this site and watching a few vloggers. In a few years I will not have more than 3 to 5 logins on anything and those will be value add and must be within driving distance. All critical services I use will require walking into a building in person.
If I could find a reputable construction company to build my underground home I would be a true troglodyte.
It seems to me that major US cloud companies are using politics to try to get more value from non-US data, which I believe will push the EU (and others) to accelerate the move to their own alternatives. This is another move that seems to sacrifice longer-term trust (and profits) to boost near-term profits.
There's a substantial population of most countries who feel that everyone else on the planet is somehow inferior. Basic nationalism. One of the big achievements of the 20th century was reducing that so it might be below 50% in many places.
However, that's not the same as "enemy". That's a more confrontational level. It's that particular branch of the far right which has recently risen to prominence. Ironically, in a lot of different countries.
Or maybe a better product that’s cheaper. Let’s not let hubris get the best of us. There’s nothing special about the US. I mean imagine being an Oracle customer and switching to a local supplier. Must be like emerging from a nightmare
Much of the US media is captured, so virtually nothing is fed back to us Americans. This also builds on top of US gunboat diplomacy going all the way back to the Monroe Doctrine. Keeping Americans ignorant allows our government and corporations a free hand in foreign affairs. The limited information allowed through is heavily sanitized and depicts US actions as the Good Guys attacked by the Evil X, which is why so many of our wars start with a ship "under attack" (USS Maine, RMS Lusitania, Gulf of Tonkin incident), or supposed WMDs (Iran, Iraq)
A great example is the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor. Ask any American and they can call up all kinds of minute details about the attack. However if you ask them about the US trade embargoes and blockades against Japan in the months leading up to the attack, the vast majority of Americans will draw a blank. That is on purpose.
When stuff does break through to us, raw and unfiltered, most will react with horror. The self image of Americans as the Good Guys cracks. This happened in the Viet-Nam conflict when journalists had a free hand to show what was happening. Massive protests and a near mutiny by the US Army caused the Pentagon to get far more involved in how wars are presented in future conflicts. More recently Americans were so horrified when they witnessed the Israeli genocide after October 7th that it completely inverted both public sentiment and support for Israel, causing the forced sale of TikTok to Oracle and under US control to clamp down on the coverage.
The republican population and the foolish minded people who want to be centrists have led to this situation of democrats and republican politicians acting out this way. More than 50% hopefully don't feel that way. I don't
I can’t imagine such a thing either, but here in Europe plenty of organisations continue planning on increasing their reliance and lock-in on American tech corps.
I think it's more likely we end up with a better software ecosystem. There will be plenty of companies for the foreseeable future willing to buy from either continent if one offering is substantially better. More competition will be better, as long as the US govt doesn't succeed in stifling it.
Microsoft for example has had a de facto monopoly in many areas for quite some time and I doubt many would argue that their software quality has flourished in recent years.
At this stage tech companies should be pushing for very strong legislation that makes the US a bastion of data privacy to restore trust. But they are still pushing in the other direction.
I guess all the criminals in the US are really hoping the EU gets it's way. Then they can put all their data in EU servers and not worry US authorities can look at it even with a valid warrant and a court order.
Seems like conflicting problems.
Editorial Channel
What the content says
ND
PreamblePreamble
Content not accessible; HTTP 401 response prevents evaluation of editorial content.
FW Ratio: 60%
Observable Facts
HTTP 401 Unauthorized response returned for the URL.
Page displays captcha-delivery.com challenge requiring JavaScript and ad blocker disablement.
No article text or editorial content is retrievable from the page response.
Inferences
The 401 error and access barriers prevent direct observation of article content and editorial framing.
The structural requirement to enable JavaScript and disable ad blockers aligns with observed domain accessibility limitations noted in the cached DCP.
ND
Article 1Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood
Content not accessible.
ND
Article 2Non-Discrimination
Medium Practice
Content not accessible.
FW Ratio: 60%
Observable Facts
Page requires JavaScript execution to proceed.
Page requires disabling ad blockers to function.
Captcha challenge is presented as access gate.
Inferences
These technical barriers may discriminate against users with limited JavaScript support or accessibility tools.
The structural practice conflicts with equal access principles underlying Article 2's non-discrimination mandate.
ND
Article 3Life, Liberty, Security
Content not accessible.
ND
Article 4No Slavery
Content not accessible.
ND
Article 5No Torture
Content not accessible.
ND
Article 6Legal Personhood
Content not accessible.
ND
Article 7Equality Before Law
Content not accessible.
ND
Article 8Right to Remedy
Content not accessible.
ND
Article 9No Arbitrary Detention
Content not accessible.
ND
Article 10Fair Hearing
Content not accessible.
ND
Article 11Presumption of Innocence
Content not accessible.
ND
Article 12Privacy
Medium Practice
Content not accessible.
FW Ratio: 60%
Observable Facts
Page source references captcha-delivery.com with stored cookies.
Cookie variable 'nLXXLD9gL4IRH9YWaN2bbQ6NnoSh0JjhxZ0AcrFeIiIuJMEaHjqatMNnyK~G_oZHYjkWZvPGZ9eHo2dnXu9JksYp4SRqAfpdJbq_nY9vDwodF7i525NSBY0YuFCD8BFV' is embedded in page code.
Analytics and tracking cookies are standard to domain practice per cached DCP.
Inferences
The structural use of third-party tracking infrastructure suggests behavioral monitoring practices that may infringe on privacy rights.
Captcha delivery domain tracking compounds the domain-level privacy concerns noted in cached DCP modifier of -0.08 for ad tracking.
ND
Article 13Freedom of Movement
Content not accessible.
ND
Article 14Asylum
Content not accessible.
ND
Article 15Nationality
Content not accessible.
ND
Article 16Marriage & Family
Content not accessible.
ND
Article 17Property
Content not accessible.
ND
Article 18Freedom of Thought
Content not accessible.
ND
Article 19Freedom of Expression
Medium Practice
Content not accessible; cannot evaluate editorial framing or information provision.
FW Ratio: 60%
Observable Facts
Page returns HTTP 401 Unauthorized error.
Captcha and technical requirements block content access before article is visible.
No article text is accessible to evaluate freedom of information provision.
Inferences
The access barriers prevent the domain's stated editorial mission of public information access from functioning for this URL.
Structural gatekeeping contradicts the positive domain-level signals for news accessibility and editorial standards.
ND
Article 20Assembly & Association
Content not accessible.
ND
Article 21Political Participation
Content not accessible.
ND
Article 22Social Security
Content not accessible.
ND
Article 23Work & Equal Pay
Content not accessible.
ND
Article 24Rest & Leisure
Content not accessible.
ND
Article 25Standard of Living
Content not accessible.
ND
Article 26Education
Content not accessible.
ND
Article 27Cultural Participation
Content not accessible.
ND
Article 28Social & International Order
Content not accessible.
ND
Article 29Duties to Community
Content not accessible.
ND
Article 30No Destruction of Rights
Content not accessible.
Structural Channel
What the site does
Domain Context Profile
Element
Modifier
Affects
Note
Privacy
-0.05
Article 12
Reuters employs tracking cookies and analytics; captcha delivery domain suggests behavioral tracking infrastructure.
Terms of Service
—
No observable ToS signals in current state.
Accessibility
-0.10
Article 2 Article 19
Page requires JavaScript and ad blocker disable; creates barriers to access for certain users.
Mission
+0.15
Article 19
Reuters is established news organization with editorial mission focused on factual reporting and public information access.
Editorial Code
+0.10
Article 19
Reuters maintains editorial standards and fact-checking practices; observable through domain reputation.
Ownership
—
Institutional ownership structure; no immediate conflict signals.
Access Model
+0.05
Article 19
Free access model to news content supports information access rights.
Ad/Tracking
-0.08
Article 12
Behavioral ad tracking through multiple domains and cookies; privacy concern.
-0.10
Article 2Non-Discrimination
Medium Practice
Structural
-0.10
Context Modifier
-0.10
SETL
ND
Page implements access controls (JavaScript requirement, captcha, ad blocker restrictions) that create barriers to information access for users with disabilities or restricted technical environments.
-0.10
Article 19Freedom of Expression
Medium Practice
Structural
-0.10
Context Modifier
+0.20
SETL
ND
Page employs access barriers (JavaScript requirement, captcha, ad blocker restrictions) that limit information access. Conflicts with domain-level modifiers supporting Article 19 (+0.15 mission, +0.1 editorial code, +0.05 access model).
-0.13
Article 12Privacy
Medium Practice
Structural
-0.13
Context Modifier
-0.13
SETL
ND
Page employs tracking cookies, behavioral analytics, and captcha-delivery.com infrastructure indicating privacy monitoring. Combines with domain-level ad tracking and cookie use documented in cached DCP.
ND
PreamblePreamble
Page enforces JavaScript requirement and captcha challenge; access barrier present.