8 points by tomgag 3 hours ago | 0 comments on HN
| Moderately positive lean across human rights dimensions, with strongest signals on Article 19 (freedom of expression) and Article 12 (privacy). Weaker coverage on social, economic, and political rights. No negative scores observed. Author demonstrates advocacy stance toward transparency, freedom, and protection of human autonomy against technological threats. Editorial
· vv3.4 · 2026-02-25
Article Heatmap
Negative Neutral Positive No Data
Aggregates
Weighted Mean
+0.49
Unweighted Mean
+0.46
Max
+0.81 Article 19
Min
+0.25 Article 2
Signal
21
No Data
10
Confidence
ND
Volatility
0.28 (Medium)
Negative
0
Channels
E: 0.6S: 0.4
SETL
+0.11
Editorial-dominant
FW Ratio
60%
0 facts · 0 inferences
Evidence: High: 2 Medium: 14 Low: 5 No Data: 10
Theme Radar
Domain Context Profile
Element
Modifier
Affects
Note
Privacy
+0.15
Article 3 Article 12
Site explicitly denies consent to train ML models on content; provides encrypted contact options (XMPP); displays privacy-conscious values.
Terms of Service
—
No formal Terms of Service observed on-domain.
Accessibility
-0.10
Article 2
HTML structure uses deprecated XHTML 1.0 Transitional; minimal semantic markup; reliance on color-coded text may affect screen readers; alt text present but sparse.
Mission
+0.20
Article 19 Article 27
Homepage explicitly positions author as cryptography/privacy advocate; RSS feed and open contact methods signal commitment to freedom of expression and information access.
Editorial Code
+0.10
Article 19 Article 20
Author declares all opinions are personal; disclaims representation of others; provides factual context on censorship in AI systems.
Ownership
—
Individual personal homepage; no corporate or state control signals detected.
Access Model
+0.15
Article 27
Content freely accessible; RSS feed available; no paywalls or registration barriers; CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 licensing.
Ad/Tracking
+0.15
Article 12
No advertising observed; no tracking pixels or analytics scripts visible in provided HTML; minimal client-side footprint.
Score Breakdown
+0.52
PreamblePreamble
Medium Advocacy Framing
Editorial
+0.50
Structural
+0.40
SETL
+0.22
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Editorial content advocates for human dignity and freedom of thought against AI-mediated control and propaganda. Structural design prioritizes accessibility of ideas via RSS and open contact, though HTML accessibility could be improved.
Observable Facts
Content explicitly warns about AI's capacity to reveal and exploit 'how you think,' your reasoning patterns and uncertainties.
Author frames AI censorship as a threat to societal freedom and dignity comparable to surveillance by a corrupt therapist.
Site provides RSS feed and encrypted contact methods (XMPP, email) without registration requirements.
Inferences
The editorial framing positions human cognitive autonomy and freedom of conscience as fundamental values worthy of protection.
Open distribution model (RSS, no registration) reflects commitment to equal access to information, consistent with Preamble values of universal dignity.
+0.50
Article 1Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood
Medium Advocacy Framing
Editorial
+0.40
Structural
+0.50
SETL
-0.22
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Editorial content emphasizes human equality in cognitive capabilities and dignity despite AI-driven power asymmetries. Structural transparency (open licensing, RSS) supports equal standing.
Observable Facts
Author states that all people should equally distrust AI and treat it as 'charming, evil pathological liar' regardless of source.
Content frames Chinese AI censorship as equally problematic as Western corporate AI surveillance—no differentiation in human dignity threat.
Page disclaims ML training on site content, asserting user-creator rights against exploitation.
Inferences
Framing AI distrust as universal principle suggests belief in fundamental cognitive equality across nations and backgrounds.
Defense against ML training on personal content reflects assertion of equal rights to intellectual autonomy.
+0.25
Article 2Non-Discrimination
Medium Framing
Editorial
+0.35
Structural
+0.30
SETL
+0.13
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Editorial content does not explicitly address discrimination; structural accessibility gaps (deprecated HTML, color-dependent text) create barriers. Author discusses geopolitical bias but not in UDHR Article 2 non-discrimination frame.
Observable Facts
HTML uses deprecated XHTML 1.0 Transitional markup without semantic structure.
Site relies heavily on color differentiation (magenta, cyan, white text on black) which may be inaccessible to colorblind users.
No explicit statement on non-discrimination principles; focus is on ideological/geopolitical critique rather than universal rights.
Inferences
Outdated HTML structure and lack of semantic markup suggest limited investment in accessibility for users with varying abilities.
Absence of inclusive design language suggests Article 2 concerns may not be primary in author's UDHR framework.
+0.58
Article 3Life, Liberty, Security
Medium Advocacy
Editorial
+0.55
Structural
+0.40
SETL
+0.29
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Editorial content explicitly defends right to life, liberty and security against AI-mediated threats. Author frames open-source AI as security risk to human autonomy. Structural provision of encrypted contact and no tracking supports liberty.
Observable Facts
Author describes AI censorship and surveillance as existential threats to human security and autonomy.
Content frames AI's knowledge of user 'reasoning patterns' and 'uncertainties' as violation of psychological safety.
Site provides XMPP and email contact without surveillance, supporting structural liberty.
Inferences
Author's advocacy against AI-mediated thought surveillance reflects understanding of liberty as freedom from cognitive manipulation.
Encrypted contact methods and anti-tracking stance support right to security of person.
ND
Article 4No Slavery
No observable content addressing slavery, servitude, or forced labor.
+0.35
Article 5No Torture
Low Framing
Editorial
+0.30
Structural
+0.30
SETL
0.00
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Editorial content critiques censorship and propaganda but does not explicitly address torture or cruel/degrading treatment. Minimal structural signal.
Observable Facts
Author uses term 'propaganda' to describe Qwen censorship, suggesting awareness of information abuse as harm.
No explicit discussion of physical or psychological torture.
Inferences
Critique of information censorship implies recognition that cognitive harm via propaganda is a form of degradation.
ND
Article 6Legal Personhood
No observable content addressing right to recognition as person before the law.
+0.43
Article 7Equality Before Law
Medium Advocacy Framing
Editorial
+0.40
Structural
+0.35
SETL
+0.14
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Editorial content implicitly addresses equal protection by critiquing how AI censorship in Qwen and similar systems creates unequal access to information. Author argues Chinese LLMs impose politically asymmetric treatment. Structural openness (no paywalls) supports equal protection principle.
Observable Facts
Author documents that Qwen refuses to answer questions about Tiananmen Square while Western models answer freely, showing unequal treatment.
Content argues that Chinese models export censorship globally while Western models export different biases, creating asymmetric information access.
Site provides content freely without registration or payment, creating equal structural access.
Inferences
Author's documentation of differential AI responses implies critique of unequal protection under information systems.
Free access model supports principle of equal treatment before law by not gatekeeping knowledge.
+0.30
Article 8Right to Remedy
Low Practice
Editorial
ND
Structural
+0.30
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
No explicit editorial discussion of right to remedies. Structural signal: author contacted Infomaniak support regarding Euria censorship and documented response, suggesting implicit belief in right to seek remedy.
Observable Facts
Author submitted complaint to Infomaniak about Qwen censorship and documented the support response.
No explicit claim that remedies were adequate or that author's rights were vindicated.
Inferences
Act of contacting support and publishing the response suggests author exercises right to seek remedy, though without explicit commentary on adequacy.
ND
Article 9No Arbitrary Detention
No observable content addressing arbitrary arrest or detention.
ND
Article 10Fair Hearing
No observable content addressing fair public hearing or independent tribunal.
ND
Article 11Presumption of Innocence
No observable content addressing presumption of innocence or ex post facto law.
+0.78
Article 12Privacy
High Advocacy Practice
Editorial
+0.60
Structural
+0.65
SETL
-0.18
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Editorial content explicitly criticizes invasive AI that reveals private thoughts and reasoning patterns. Author frames this as violation of privacy and dignity. Structural design avoids tracking, uses encrypted contact, denies ML training consent—strong privacy-protective signals.
Observable Facts
Author states: 'When you work through a problem with an AI assistant, you're not just revealing information - you're revealing how you think. Your reasoning patterns. Your uncertainties.'
Page contains explicit notice: 'Consent to use this content to train machine learning models is explicitly denied.'
Site provides XMPP, email, and Mastodon contact with no tracking infrastructure visible in HTML.
No cookies, analytics, or third-party scripts present in provided markup.
Inferences
Author advocates for protection of cognitive privacy as fundamental human right, not merely data privacy.
Refusal of ML training consent and provision of encrypted contact reflect practical commitment to Article 12 principles.
Structural design (no tracking, open protocols) materially implements privacy protection rather than merely professing it.
+0.63
Article 13Freedom of Movement
Medium Advocacy Practice
Editorial
+0.50
Structural
+0.55
SETL
-0.17
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Editorial content discusses freedom of movement across nations in implicit way (author is Swiss, discusses global AI access). Structural openness supports movement of ideas. Primary focus is freedom of expression rather than physical movement.
Observable Facts
Author references Switzerland, China, US, EU, and international context for AI deployment, suggesting transnational perspective.
Content is freely distributed globally via RSS without geographic restriction.
Author explicitly states 'All the opinions expressed herein are mine only' supporting individual liberty to hold position independent of state.
Inferences
Global distribution model and transnational analysis imply support for freedom of persons to access information across borders.
Discussion of 'digital sovereignty' for EU and Switzerland reflects concern for independent right to choose information sources.
+0.31
Article 14Asylum
Low Framing
Editorial
+0.35
Structural
+0.25
SETL
+0.19
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
No explicit discussion of asylum or refuge. Author critiques global geopolitical forces (US, China, EU) but not in frame of right to seek asylum. No structural signals related to sanctuary or protection of displaced persons.
Observable Facts
Author discusses geopolitical tensions and AI as 'soft power' but does not address persecution or asylum.
Inferences
Absence of asylum-related content suggests this aspect of UDHR is outside author's primary focus area.
ND
Article 15Nationality
No observable content addressing nationality or right to change nationality.
ND
Article 16Marriage & Family
No observable content addressing marriage or family rights.
+0.48
Article 17Property
Medium Advocacy Framing
Editorial
+0.45
Structural
+0.40
SETL
+0.15
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Editorial content addresses protection of intellectual property in implicit way: author denies ML training consent and licenses content under CC-BY-NC-SA, protecting against unauthorized use. Structural protection via copyright notice and explicit license.
Observable Facts
Page contains statement: 'unless differently specified, all the contents of this website are released under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.'
Author explicitly denies 'Consent to use this content to train machine learning models.'
Page declares human authorship: 'All the text on this website is human-generated.'
Inferences
CC-BY-NC-SA licensing and ML training refusal reflect author's assertion of rights to intellectual property.
Copyright notice and human authorship declaration protect against unauthorized appropriation by commercial interests or AI training.
+0.63
Article 18Freedom of Thought
Medium Advocacy Framing
Editorial
+0.55
Structural
+0.50
SETL
+0.17
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Editorial content addresses freedom of thought and conscience indirectly through critique of AI censorship and propaganda. Author frames protection of unfiltered thought as essential human right. Structural design respects user autonomy by providing tools (RSS, encrypted contact) without coercion.
Observable Facts
Author states that AI training on user interactions reveals 'the shape of your mental model' and enables 'a third party to convince you of something' against your will.
Content critiques systems that impose CCP ideology on users through fine-tuned models, describing this as violation of conscience.
Site provides opt-in contact methods and RSS without pushing engagement.
Inferences
Critique of AI censorship as conscience violation reflects Article 18 framework.
Opt-in structural design respects freedom of conscience by allowing users to disengage.
+0.81
Article 19Freedom of Expression
High Advocacy Framing
Editorial
+0.75
Structural
+0.65
SETL
+0.27
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Core focus of content. Editorial explicitly defends freedom of opinion and expression as fundamental right. Author critiques suppression of Tiananmen information and argues for open debate on AI. Structural support: RSS feed, open access, no paywalls, transparent licensing.
Observable Facts
Author documents Qwen refusal to provide information about Tiananmen Square massacre and calls this 'censorship.'
Content argues that information suppression about sensitive topics violates human rights to form informed opinions.
Author advocates for 'serious conversation' about AI regulation and challenges status quo without restriction.
Page provides RSS feed for free distribution of editorial content.
All content freely accessible without registration or payment.
Inferences
Documentation of AI censorship and explicit critique of it directly engages Article 19 protection of freedom of expression.
Free distribution mechanisms (RSS, no paywalls) materially support freedom to receive and impart information.
Author's publication of unfiltered critique of major tech companies and governments demonstrates commitment to expression freedom.
+0.61
Article 20Assembly & Association
Medium Advocacy Practice
Editorial
+0.60
Structural
+0.50
SETL
+0.24
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Editorial content shows support for peaceful assembly and association through critique of top-down control mechanisms. Author advocates for 'grassroot movement' for alternative AI. Structural support: open publishing, RSS, multiple contact methods enabling community.
Observable Facts
Author states: 'I don't see how we can be successful in this [open-source AI] through a grassroot movement. But I would definitely join one if an initiative in this sense manifests.'
Content advocates for 'EU-led initiative' suggesting multi-stakeholder collaboration.
Site provides multiple contact methods (email, XMPP, Mastodon, RSS) enabling connection with audience.
Inferences
Author's openness to grassroot organizing reflects support for freedom of assembly principle.
Provision of multiple communication channels structurally enables association and collective action.
+0.38
Article 21Political Participation
Low Framing
Editorial
+0.35
Structural
+0.30
SETL
+0.13
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
No explicit discussion of political participation, voting, or public service. Author critiques governance of tech conferences (feedback on submissions) and corporate policies (Infomaniak's AI adoption) but does not address political rights directly.
Observable Facts
Separate blog post critiques cybersecurity conference selection processes for lack of transparency, implying concern for fair participation.
No discussion of electoral participation, government service, or political decision-making.
Inferences
Critique of opaque conference decision-making suggests concern for participatory fairness, though not explicitly in political terms.
+0.30
Article 22Social Security
Low Practice
Editorial
ND
Structural
+0.30
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
No explicit editorial discussion of social security, welfare, or economic rights. Structural signal: author is cryptographer/consultant announcing security consultancy (Lucumo Security), suggesting engagement with economic participation, but not analyzed here.
Observable Facts
Author mentions creating 'Lucumo Security' entity for consulting work, suggesting participation in economic life.
Inferences
Economic participation in consulting suggests awareness of right to work, though not explicitly addressed in editorial.
+0.33
Article 23Work & Equal Pay
Low Practice
Editorial
+0.25
Structural
+0.30
SETL
-0.12
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Minimal observable content. Author mentions consulting work and formation of Lucumo Security but does not discuss work rights, fair wages, or labor standards. No discussion of workplace protections or labor organizing.
Observable Facts
Author references 'requests for consulting or other work from my main employer and other international clients,' suggesting engagement with employment.
No discussion of wages, working conditions, labor rights, or organizing.
Inferences
Professional consulting work implies participation in labor market, but no explicit commentary on Article 23 principles.
ND
Article 24Rest & Leisure
No observable content addressing rest, leisure, or reasonable working hours.
ND
Article 25Standard of Living
No observable content addressing health, food, housing, or medical care.
+0.48
Article 26Education
Medium Advocacy Framing
Editorial
+0.40
Structural
+0.35
SETL
+0.14
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Editorial content advocates for open-source education and knowledge access. Author discusses Free Software philosophy as precedent for creating trustworthy tools. Structural support: free content distribution, RSS, transparent licensing, technical documentation.
Observable Facts
Author states: 'We have spent the last 40 years trying to pass the message that open-source software is Good,' comparing to challenges with open-source AI.
Page includes RSS feed for knowledge distribution.
Technical content freely available without paywalls or registration.
Inferences
Author's engagement with Free Software philosophy reflects belief in right to education and knowledge access.
Provision of technical tutorials and open licensing support right to participate in cultural/technical development of community.
Free distribution model enables everyone to access educational content regardless of economic status.
+0.73
Article 27Cultural Participation
High Advocacy Practice
Editorial
+0.65
Structural
+0.60
SETL
+0.18
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Strong focus on protection of cultural interests and intellectual commons. Author advocates for Free Software philosophy, open-source alternatives, and public investment in AI. Structural support: CC-BY-NC-SA licensing, RSS distribution, technical documentation, explicit anti-ML-training clause.
Observable Facts
Author defends Free Software as cultural/scientific achievement: 'We have spent the last 40 years trying to pass the message that open-source software is Good.'
Content advocates for 'EU-led initiative to release a performant open-source model' as cultural alternative to corporate/Chinese-controlled AI.
Page licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0, protecting derivative works and commons.
Explicit refusal of ML training consent protects author's scientific contribution from extraction.
Technical documentation (LUKS guide, security analysis) contributes to public knowledge commons.
Inferences
Author's advocacy for open-source scientific tools reflects commitment to Article 27 right to participate in scientific progress.
CC-BY-NC-SA licensing and anti-ML-training clause protect right to benefit from cultural/scientific output.
Calls for public funding of EU AI model reflect belief in right to participate in technological culture of community.
+0.51
Article 28Social & International Order
Medium Advocacy Framing
Editorial
+0.50
Structural
+0.40
SETL
+0.22
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Editorial content implicitly addresses right to social and international order by critiquing failures of current institutions to regulate AI and protect human autonomy. Author argues existing frameworks are insufficient. Structural transparency supports accountability.
Observable Facts
Author states: 'we, as a Western society, need to start a serious conversation about what to do with AI' and criticizes lack of institutional response.
Content argues that existing oversight (OSI definition, corporate structures) has failed to prevent AI censorship and surveillance.
Author expresses hopelessness about ability of current institutional arrangements to protect people: 'I don't know what I can trust.'
Inferences
Critique of institutional failures implies expectation that UDHR rights should be protected by effective social/international order.
Call for new initiatives (EU AI model, grassroot movements) reflects frustration with existing order and desire for better protection.
+0.53
Article 29Duties to Community
Medium Advocacy Framing
Editorial
+0.50
Structural
+0.45
SETL
+0.16
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Editorial content articulates duties to community and others: author emphasizes responsibility of tech companies (Infomaniak, OpenAI, Chinese AI companies) and individuals to oppose censorship and surveillance. Structural design demonstrates author's own responsibilities.
Observable Facts
Author critiques Infomaniak's choices: 'I think that self-hosting open-source AI models is still the safest way to go' and calls for them to 'kill the f****** thing with fire' if censorship cannot be resolved.
Content frames AI regulation as collective responsibility: 'This is maybe a reflection for another blog post, but I think the reason why so much money is spent on AI is...'
Author demonstrates personal responsibility by: publishing detailed critique, contacting company support, providing technical documentation for secure practices.
Inferences
Author's detailed critique and specific demands reflect belief that companies have duties to users and society regarding AI ethics.
Publication of analysis and recommendations demonstrates author's felt responsibility to educate and inform community.
Provision of technical guidance (LUKS encryption) reflects understanding of duty to help others protect themselves.
+0.58
Article 30No Destruction of Rights
Medium Advocacy Framing
Editorial
+0.55
Structural
+0.50
SETL
+0.17
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Editorial content explicitly defends right to use UDHR to challenge abuses. Author argues against AI censorship and surveillance, which directly violate other Articles. Structural support: publishing dissent, free distribution, refusing to suppress information.
Observable Facts
Author uses detailed evidence and argumentation to challenge corporate and state-sponsored AI censorship, implicitly invoking higher standard of human rights.
Content advocates against restrictions: 'we completely fell for it because we built no alternatives' and calls for transparency and alternatives.
Page freely publishes critique of major entities (Moxie Marlinspike's Confer, Infomaniak, Chinese tech companies) without self-censorship.
Inferences
Author's detailed critique of rights violations (censorship, surveillance, propaganda) reflects commitment to UDHR as standard for evaluating institutions.
Publication of this critique without restriction demonstrates author's exercise of Article 30 right to use UDHR to challenge violations.