Repository landing page; no explicit organizational mission statement on-domain.
Editorial Code
—
GitHub as platform does not impose editorial restrictions on repository content; code hosting is neutral.
Ownership
+0.05
Article 17
Cloudflare ownership and copyright metadata visible; intellectual property rights clearly attributable.
Access Model
+0.25
Article 19 Article 27
Public repository with open-source access; no paywalls or discriminatory access restrictions observed. Supports universal right to participate in culture and access information.
Ad/Tracking
-0.10
Article 12 Article 3
Page loads analytics collectors and octolytics tracking; visitor payload and HMAC tokens indicate behavioral monitoring despite privacy controls being present.
Score Breakdown
+0.45
PreamblePreamble
Medium Framing
Editorial
ND
Structural
+0.30
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Page framing emphasizes open-source collaboration and democratic code sharing. Structural transparency through public repository and open access model supports human dignity and freedom values.
Observable Facts
Repository is public and accessible to all without authentication barriers.
Page displays project metadata and open-source licensing information.
Inferences
Public repository structure frames software development as universally accessible, aligning with Preamble values of universal human participation.
Lack of paywalls or access restrictions suggests commitment to equal participation.
+0.35
Article 1Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood
Medium Framing
Editorial
ND
Structural
+0.25
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Open-source platform structure treats all repository participants and visitors equally without visible discrimination based on identity markers.
Observable Facts
No login requirement to view repository content.
Contributes structure accessible to all users regardless of status.
Inferences
Public visibility and equal information access imply non-discriminatory approach to human participation.
Platform treats repository owner and visitors with structural parity in viewing capabilities.
+0.30
Article 2Non-Discrimination
Low Framing
Editorial
ND
Structural
+0.20
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
No observable discrimination in access or display. Public repository structure does not impose differential treatment.
Observable Facts
Repository accessible without identity-based restrictions.
Inferences
Lack of discriminatory paywalls or access controls suggests non-discriminatory structural design.
+0.35
Article 3Life, Liberty, Security
Medium Framing
Editorial
ND
Structural
+0.30
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Open development model allows individual participation in project evolution. Transparency and public history support individual security through visible governance.
Observable Facts
Public commit history and contributor attribution visible.
Repository structure enables individual identification and accountability.
Inferences
Public attribution system protects individual identity and contribution recognition.
Transparent development history provides structural security for participants.
ND
Article 4No Slavery
No observable content addressing slavery or servitude on repository page.
ND
Article 5No Torture
No observable content addressing torture or cruel treatment on repository page.
+0.30
Article 6Legal Personhood
Low Framing
Editorial
ND
Structural
+0.20
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Public repository structure recognizes participants as rights-bearers through attribution and access mechanisms.
Observable Facts
Contributor names and profiles are publicly displayed.
Inferences
Public recognition of individuals suggests acknowledgment of personhood and agency.
+0.35
Article 7Equality Before Law
Medium Framing
Editorial
ND
Structural
+0.25
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Repository structure provides equal protection through non-discriminatory access and visibility. Open-source licensing protects participants from arbitrary action.
Observable Facts
Public access model applies equal visibility rules to all users.
Repository metadata includes licensing information protecting user rights.
Inferences
Non-discriminatory access structure provides equal protection before platform rules.
Licensing framework protects against arbitrary restrictions on code use.
+0.45
Article 8Right to Remedy
Medium Practice Framing
Editorial
ND
Structural
+0.30
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
GitHub provides mechanisms for intellectual property rights enforcement through licensing and DMCA compliance. Repository structure supports protection of creative work.
Observable Facts
Repository can display license information protecting creator rights.
GitHub provides copyright takedown mechanisms and attribution tracking.
Inferences
Licensing support suggests structural commitment to protecting intellectual property.
Public attribution enables creators to claim rights to their work.
ND
Article 9No Arbitrary Detention
No observable content addressing arbitrary arrest or detention on repository page.
+0.30
Article 10Fair Hearing
Low Framing
Editorial
ND
Structural
+0.20
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Public repository structure provides transparent, equal treatment without evidence of hidden adjudication or bias.
Observable Facts
Repository information publicly displayed without hidden conditions.
Access rules applied equally to all visitors.
Inferences
Transparent repository structure suggests equal treatment and visibility of rules.
ND
Article 11Presumption of Innocence
No observable content addressing criminal procedure or presumption of innocence on repository page.
-0.35
Article 12Privacy
Medium Practice
Editorial
ND
Structural
-0.25
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Page implements analytics tracking (octolytics, visitor payload, browser stats/errors) that collects behavioral data without explicit opt-in visible on page. Privacy controls exist in GitHub settings but tracking occurs on-page by default.
Observable Facts
Page loads octolytics collector for analytics: https://collector.github.com/github/collect
Visitor payload, visitor HMAC, and request ID embedded in meta tags indicate behavioral tracking.
Meta tags for browser-stats-url and browser-errors-url indicate performance and error tracking.
Visitor payload content appears to contain session region and tracking identifiers.
Inferences
Default analytics collection without prominent notice suggests privacy is not the primary structural concern.
Embedding tracking identifiers in page structure indicates persistent behavioral monitoring.
Repository structure supports freedom of movement through public access without geographic restrictions. No paywalls or location-based blockers observed.
Observable Facts
Repository publicly accessible globally without apparent geographic restrictions.
No country-specific access controls visible on page metadata.
Inferences
Absence of geographic barriers enables cross-border participation and information flow.
Public availability suggests commitment to universal access regardless of location.
+0.35
Article 14Asylum
Low Framing
Editorial
ND
Structural
+0.25
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Public repository structure welcomes participants without visible persecution or discrimination based on origin.
Observable Facts
No restrictions based on user nationality visible in repository access.
Inferences
Open access structure suggests asylum-neutral stance through non-discriminatory platform design.
+0.25
Article 15Nationality
Low Framing
Editorial
ND
Structural
+0.20
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Repository does not appear to restrict nationality or citizenship-based participation.
Observable Facts
No nationality-based access controls visible.
Inferences
Absence of nationality restrictions suggests equality in participation rights.
ND
Article 16Marriage & Family
No observable content addressing marriage or family rights on repository page.
+0.57
Article 17Property
High Practice Framing
Editorial
+0.50
Structural
+0.45
SETL
+0.16
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Repository clearly identifies owner (Cloudflare) and provides licensing framework protecting intellectual property. Code repository structure supports property rights through licensing and attribution mechanisms.
Observable Facts
Page title and metadata explicitly identify Cloudflare as repository owner.
Repository structure enables license attribution which protects intellectual property claims.
GitHub provides mechanisms for copyright assertion and licensing enforcement.
Inferences
Clear ownership attribution supports right to own property in creative work.
Licensing framework protects property rights through enforceable terms.
Public visibility of ownership enables legitimate property claims.
+0.50
Article 18Freedom of Thought
Medium Framing Practice
Editorial
ND
Structural
+0.35
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Public repository structure enables freedom of thought and conscience through open participation. Developers can fork, modify, and express ideas through code without apparent censorship.
Observable Facts
Repository structure supports code forking and modification, enabling expression of ideas.
No content filters or censorship mechanisms visible in page structure.
Public visibility enables freedom to publish technical ideas.
Inferences
Forking capability suggests structural support for freedom to develop alternative implementations.
Absence of ideological filters supports freedom of thought expression.
Open-source model enables dissemination of ideas without gatekeepers.
+0.72
Article 19Freedom of Expression
High Advocacy Practice Framing
Editorial
+0.50
Structural
+0.55
SETL
-0.17
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Repository structure and page content directly support freedom of expression through public code sharing, documentation, and open collaboration. No censorship mechanisms observed. Public visibility of all content supports seeking and sharing information.
Observable Facts
Repository is publicly visible with searchable, indexable content.
Page displays full project information without hiding or redacting content.
GitHub search and discovery features enable finding and sharing information.
No content removal or censorship evidence visible on page.
Code comments, documentation, and commit messages publicly accessible.
Inferences
Public repository structure is fundamentally designed to enable expression.
Full indexing and discoverability support universal access to published ideas.
Absence of content filters or forced modifications supports freedom to express technical viewpoints.
Open-source licensing enables sharing information freely without DRM or access restrictions.
Transparent development history enables expression of design rationale and philosophy.
+0.47
Article 20Assembly & Association
Medium Framing Practice
Editorial
+0.35
Structural
+0.40
SETL
-0.14
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Repository structure enables peaceful assembly through public discussion mechanisms (issues, discussions, pull requests). No restrictions on peaceful collaboration observed.
Observable Facts
Repository provides issue tracking and discussion features for community conversation.
Pull request system enables structured collaboration and assembly.
No restrictions on group participation or collaborative features visible.
Inferences
Discussion and collaboration features structurally support freedom of assembly.
Open participation in code review and issues enables peaceful gathering of developers.
Absence of restrictions on group communication supports assembly rights.
+0.45
Article 21Political Participation
Medium Framing
Editorial
ND
Structural
+0.30
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Public repository structure enables participation in public affairs through open-source governance. Code decisions are transparent and publicly visible.
Observable Facts
Repository commits and decisions publicly visible and auditable.
No hidden governance or decision-making processes evident in page structure.
Public star/watch counts enable democratic participation signals.
Inferences
Transparent development history enables participation in understanding project governance.
Public visibility supports informed participation in technical decisions.
Open repository structure enables monitoring and influence over project direction.
+0.40
Article 22Social Security
Medium Framing
Editorial
ND
Structural
+0.25
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Open-source participation and collaborative development provide structural support for social security through mutual aid and community contribution.
Observable Facts
Repository enables collective problem-solving through open participation.
Contributor attribution system recognizes social contribution.
Open-source licensing enables community benefit from shared knowledge.
Inferences
Collaborative structure enables mutual aid through shared technical development.
Public attribution supports recognition of social contributions.
Community-driven development provides social benefit through pooled knowledge.
+0.45
Article 23Work & Equal Pay
Medium Framing Practice
Editorial
ND
Structural
+0.35
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Repository structure enables work and choice of employment through open-source contribution opportunities. No forced labor structures observed.
Observable Facts
Repository enables voluntary participation and contribution.
No evidence of coerced labor or mandatory participation mechanisms.
Open-source model supports choice in work engagement.
Inferences
Voluntary contribution model respects freedom to choose participation level.
Public recognition of contributors enables work attribution.
Open-source licensing supports equitable benefit from collective work.
+0.30
Article 24Rest & Leisure
Low Framing
Editorial
ND
Structural
+0.20
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Repository structure respects developer rest and leisure through voluntary participation model. No mandatory engagement mechanisms observed.
Observable Facts
Participation in repository is voluntary with no enforcement mechanisms.
No time-based restrictions or mandatory activity requirements visible.
Inferences
Voluntary engagement model respects freedom to control personal time.
Absence of mandatory contribution schedules supports rest and leisure rights.
+0.70
Article 25Standard of Living
High Practice Framing
Editorial
ND
Structural
+0.40
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
GitHub implements extensive accessibility features supporting rights to adequate standard of living. Page includes high-contrast themes, colorblind modes (tritanopia, protanopia), keyboard navigation, ARIA attributes, and skip-to-content links.
Observable Facts
Page loads multiple high-contrast theme stylesheets for visual accessibility.
Page implements colorblind-friendly theme options (tritanopia, high contrast variants).
Skip-to-content link present for keyboard navigation support.
ARIA labels and semantic HTML visible throughout page structure.
Data attributes for accessibility features like a11y-animated-images and a11y-link-underlines.
Keyboard shortcuts documentation referenced in page metadata.
Inferences
Comprehensive theme support removes barriers to visual access across disability types.
Colorblind theme options demonstrate commitment to inclusive access beyond typical color schemes.
Skip-to-content and keyboard shortcuts enable equitable access for motor disabilities.
ARIA implementation supports screen reader users in experiencing content equally.
Multiple accessibility toggles suggest proactive design for diverse needs rather than reactive compliance.
+0.63
Article 26Education
Medium Framing Practice
Editorial
+0.40
Structural
+0.45
SETL
-0.15
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Repository structure supports education and cultural participation through open-source code documentation and accessibility. Public availability enables learning and cultural engagement.
Observable Facts
Repository provides technical documentation and code examples.
Public visibility enables learning from codebase and development practices.
Open-source licensing supports free access to cultural/technical knowledge.
Project description and documentation support educational access.
Inferences
Public code serves as educational resource without access barriers.
Open-source model enables cultural participation through technical contribution.
Documentation and comments enable knowledge transfer and learning.
Public visibility supports cultural development through shared technical practice.
+0.53
Article 27Cultural Participation
Medium Framing Practice
Editorial
+0.35
Structural
+0.40
SETL
-0.14
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Open-source licensing and public repository structure enable participation in cultural and scientific life. Community benefits from shared technical development.
Observable Facts
Repository enables participation in open-source cultural/scientific practice.
Licensing framework supports community benefit from technical work.
Public development history enables learning from scientific/technical methods.
Attribution system recognizes cultural/scientific contributions.
Inferences
Open-source model enables cultural participation without gatekeeping.
Public collaboration demonstrates science/culture benefits from transparency.
Community access to code enables participation in technical culture.
Attribution supports recognition of scientific/cultural contributions.
+0.35
Article 28Social & International Order
Low Framing
Editorial
ND
Structural
+0.25
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Repository structure does not impose restrictions requiring order established only through rights recognition. Open-source governance enables peaceful participation.
Observable Facts
Repository participation based on voluntary rights recognition through licensing.
No coercive governance structures visible in repository design.
Inferences
Voluntary licensing suggests order based on recognized rights rather than force.
Peaceful collaboration structure supports social order through consent.
+0.47
Article 29Duties to Community
Medium Framing Practice
Editorial
+0.30
Structural
+0.35
SETL
-0.13
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Repository structure imposes minimal restrictions on community participation. Open-source licensing balances individual freedom with community benefit.
Observable Facts
Repository provides open licensing enabling broad participation.
Licensing framework protects both individual and community rights.
No arbitrary restrictions on participation or use observed.
GitHub Terms of Service govern platform but repository licensing governs code use.
Inferences
Open-source licensing balances duties to community with freedoms.
Transparent terms enable informed consent to participation restrictions.
Licensing framework protects community benefit while respecting individual rights.
+0.25
Article 30No Destruction of Rights
Low Framing
Editorial
ND
Structural
+0.20
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Repository structure does not appear to restrict rights or freedoms articulated in UDHR. No observable attempts to destroy UDHR-aligned rights.
Observable Facts
No evidence of restrictions designed to limit UDHR rights on page.
Open-source licensing protects rather than restricts freedoms.
Inferences
Absence of rights-limiting mechanisms suggests compliance with Article 30 spirit.
Open structure supports preservation of listed freedoms.