Preamble concerns universal principles of dignity and freedom. Article headline and description focus on corporate/regulatory conflict over AI deployment, not directly engaging preamble values.

Article 1 asserts equal rights and dignity of all humans. Article discusses corporate/government policy dispute; no direct engagement with human equality or dignity.

Article 2 addresses non-discrimination. Content focuses on commercial competition; no observable discussion of discrimination or protected characteristics.

Article 3 protects right to life, liberty, security. Story concerns policy/corporate governance, not fundamental security rights.

Article 4 prohibits slavery and servitude. No observable content related to these harms.

Article 5 prohibits torture and cruel treatment. No observable content addressing these harms.

Article 6 protects right to recognition as person before law. Content does not address legal personhood or status.

Article 7 asserts equality before law and right to remedy. Content does not engage with legal equality or judicial remedy.

Article 8 protects right to effective remedy. Story concerns corporate/regulatory dispute; does not address justice remedies for individuals.

Article 9 prohibits arbitrary arrest/detention. Content addresses business/policy matters, not arrest or detention.

Article 10 guarantees fair and public hearing. Content concerns corporate governance and regulatory process, not individual trial rights.

Article 11 addresses criminal liability and presumption of innocence. Content does not engage with criminal justice.

Article 12 protects privacy from interference and protects reputation. Editorial: Article discusses corporate/government conflict without privacy invasion allegations, neutral stance. Structural: Extensive tracking infrastructure (cookies, ad pixels, authentication walls) limits privacy protection; paywall restricts content access. Domain context applies negative modifier for ad-tracking and ownership structure.

Article 13 protects freedom of movement and residence. Editorial: Story covers AI policy affecting corporate operations and regulatory authority, supporting open information discourse. Structural: News article format enables public discourse; semantic markup and structured data support content discovery and redistribution. Domain context applies positive modifier for editorial mission and accessibility.

Article 14 protects right to seek asylum and protection from persecution. Story concerns AI policy and corporate governance, not asylum or persecution. Limited direct relevance but editorial coverage of government regulatory authority may indirectly support awareness of state power.

Article 15 protects right to nationality and its change. Content does not directly address nationality; minimal relevance.

Article 16 protects marriage and family rights. Content does not address family or marriage.

Article 17 protects property rights and protection from arbitrary deprivation. Editorial: Article covers corporate property/regulatory interests and competitive access to government contracts; indirectly engages with property protection via policy discussion. Structural: News format supports discourse on property/economic rights.

Article 18 protects freedom of thought, conscience, and religion. Editorial: Story frames government regulatory decision-making regarding AI governance as public policy debate; supports freedom to advocate positions on technology governance. Structural: News format enables expression of multiple perspectives on technology policy. Domain mission supports journalism as expression channel.

Article 19 protects freedom of opinion and expression, including receiving/imparting information. Editorial: Article explicitly reports on government policy, corporate positions, and regulatory deadlines—core journalism supporting public information. Framing presents competing interests (Anthropic vs. Hegseth/xAI) enabling reader judgment. Structural: News article accessible via paid/free models; semantic metadata enables content discovery and redistribution. Domain context applies positive modifier for editorial mission and accessibility.

Article 20 protects freedom of peaceful assembly and association. Editorial: Article covers corporate participation in policy process and government decision-making regarding business interests; indirectly supports awareness of corporate/state engagement. Structural: News format enables discourse on governance participation.

Article 21 protects equal access to public service. Editorial: Article reports on government regulatory decision-making regarding AI policy; covers allocation of access/clearance to companies, raising governance/fairness questions. Structural: News format enables public scrutiny of administrative decisions.

Article 22 protects right to social security and realization of economic, social, cultural rights. Editorial: Article touches on corporate economic interests and technology policy affecting economic opportunity (AI deployment rights); tangential engagement. Structural: News format supports discourse on economic governance.

Article 23 protects right to work and free choice of employment. Content does not directly address labor rights or employment conditions; minimal relevance.

Article 24 protects right to rest and leisure. Content does not address work/rest balance; no direct relevance.

Article 25 protects right to adequate standard of living and social protection. Article covers policy/regulatory governance; minimal direct engagement with basic rights.

Article 26 protects right to education and directs it toward human development. Editorial: Article reports on government AI policy and regulatory governance; supports public education/awareness of technology policy affecting society. Educational framing allows readers to understand AI governance issues. Structural: News format accessible, with metadata supporting distribution.

Article 27 protects participation in cultural/scientific life. Editorial: Article covers technology policy and governance; relates to scientific/innovation policy domain. Structural: News format supports engagement with cultural/scientific issues.

Article 28 requires social/international order ensuring rights/freedoms in UDHR. Editorial: Article reports on government regulatory governance of AI technology; supports transparency and accountability for state action affecting technology/rights. Framing presents policy conflict enabling evaluation of governmental authority. Structural: News format enables public scrutiny of institutional orders.

Article 29 addresses duties to community and limits on rights. Content does not directly engage with balance of individual rights and community obligations; minimal relevance.

Article 30 prevents interpretation of any UDHR provision as destroying rights/freedoms. Meta-article protecting UDHR framework; not directly measurable against specific content.