Strong alignment with Preamble values: recognition of dignity, equal rights, and freedom as foundation. Page advocates for transparency as precondition for informed consent and democratic participation. Project framing centers human agency and autonomy in relation to AI systems.

Project architecture and mission implicitly affirm equal dignity and rights by treating all content creators (human and AI-assisted) as subjects worthy of disclosure. No hierarchy of voices visible.

No explicit non-discrimination clause or accessibility commitment visible. HTML structure supports multiple access modalities (widget, API, browser extension, CMS plugins) but no explicit accessibility statement or Section 508/WCAG compliance claim.

Strong protection of right to life and security by enabling identification of AI-generated health content and deepfake detection. No surveillance or exploitative practices evident in structural design.

No discussion of slavery, servitude, or forced labor visible on page. Scope limited to AI transparency and disclosure; not applicable to this briefing.

No torture or cruel treatment discussed. Scope of document does not address human suffering or punishment.

No discussion of legal personhood, status before law, or identity recognition. Scope limited to content disclosure standards.

Project architecture enforces equal protection by design: API rate limits are uniform ('Anonymous · Registered'), and the schema is universally applicable. No preferential treatment of certain users or content types visible.

Project explicitly enables enforcement of rights by providing a standardized mechanism for documenting AI contribution and disputing false claims. 'Dispute forum' and 'Dispute Alerts' service empower individuals to challenge violations.

No discussion of arbitrary detention or arrest. Scope limited to digital disclosure and transparency standards.

Project enables fair hearing through transparent, standardized disclosure mechanism and community forum for dispute resolution. However, no explicit due process guarantees or appeals mechanism visible.

Project presumes innocence by default (content is not presumed AI-generated until declared or detected). Burden of proof for violations rests on community dispute mechanism, but no explicit innocence framework articulated.

Strong protection of privacy by explicit design. Page commits to 'No Ads · No Tracking' and no intrusion into personal affairs. Multiple structural safeguards against surveillance and data exploitation.

Project enables freedom of movement and residence by providing a universal, portable standard not tied to any single jurisdiction or platform. Widget embeds anywhere; API is publicly accessible.

Project addresses right to asylum indirectly by enabling transparent disclosure that supports journalistic integrity and protects vulnerable populations in conflict zones. Journalists using AI for translation or summarization can declare it, preserving source credibility.

Project explicitly supports right to nationality and identity by enabling transparent disclosure of AI contribution to identity-related documents and content. Art & Creative section specifically protects 'human creative contributions.'

Project supports right to marriage and family by not restricting access based on personal status, but no explicit content addressing family relations or marital rights is present.

Strong protection of property rights through transparent attribution and protection of creative IP. Project enables creators to document and defend their intellectual contributions against misattribution or erasure.

Directly supports freedom of thought, conscience, and religion by providing a neutral, non-judgmental disclosure mechanism. Schema does not label AI use as good or bad; it only documents it. Allows religious and belief-based communities to transparently manage AI in their content.

Exceptionally strong alignment. Project is fundamentally an infrastructure for freedom of opinion and expression by enabling transparent disclosure that empowers informed decision-making. Core mission is to preserve human agency in evaluating content.

Strong support for freedom of peaceful assembly and association. Community forum, dispute resolution, and community governance model explicitly enable collective action and association around AI transparency.

Supports right to participation in government and public affairs by providing transparent, participatory disclosure infrastructure. Community-governed model enables citizens to participate in AI governance decisions.

Provides social security infrastructure for knowledge workers and creative professionals by protecting their intellectual property and enabling transparent attribution. Indirectly supports economic rights of content creators.

Supports right to work and fair working conditions by enabling transparent labor standards in AI-assisted content production. Medicine section explicitly addresses liability and responsible use, protecting workers from harm.

Provides infrastructure for rest and leisure by reducing cognitive burden of evaluating AI provenance through standardized disclosure. No explicit leisure rights language, but structural efficiency supports human wellbeing.

Strong alignment with right to adequate standard of living and healthcare. By enabling transparent disclosure of AI in health, education, and research content, the project protects vulnerable populations from harm caused by unvetted AI systems.

Exceptionally strong alignment with right to education. Project directly addresses education sector transparency and enables educators to evaluate AI integration in curriculum, protecting educational quality and student learning rights.

Strong alignment with participation in cultural life and protection of intellectual property. Art & Creative sector explicitly supported; project enables artists to participate transparently in AI discourse while protecting human creative contributions.

Project establishes social and international order protective of UDHR rights by proposing Declare AI as the global standard for AI transparency. Positions compliance-ready infrastructure before regulatory mandates, enabling proactive rights protection.

Project implicitly frames duties to community by emphasizing transparency and shared governance. No explicit statement of duties, but structure implies mutual obligation to disclose and respect others' right to informed decisions.

Strong protection against interpretation or application of UDHR rights to undermine others' rights. Project explicitly avoids creating new restrictions; instead, it provides transparent information to enable informed choice, preserving everyone's rights.