1 points by nradov 10 hours ago | 0 comments on HN
| Mixed Signal / Moderately Negative Mixed
· vv3.4 · 2026-02-25
Article Heatmap
Negative Neutral Positive No Data
Aggregates
Weighted Mean
-0.12
Unweighted Mean
-0.13
Max
+0.43 Article 19
Min
-0.85 Article 12
Signal
26
No Data
5
Confidence
ND
Volatility
0.58 (High)
Negative
16
Channels
E: 0.5S: 0.5
SETL
+0.14
Editorial-dominant
FW Ratio
52%
0 facts · 0 inferences
Evidence: High: 1 Medium: 20 Low: 10 No Data: 0
Theme Radar
Domain Context Profile
Element
Modifier
Affects
Note
Privacy
-0.15
Article 12
Page contains extensive tracking infrastructure (Google Analytics, data collection configs, performance monitoring). No explicit privacy consent banner visible in provided HTML. Ad tracking and telemetry systems enabled by default.
Terms of Service
—
Terms of Service not accessible from video page content provided.
Accessibility
+0.10
Article 25
Standard HTML structure, keyboard navigation support via Polymer components, but captions/transcript access not confirmed in provided snippet.
Mission
+0.05
Article 19
YouTube's stated mission includes enabling free expression and information access globally, though platform moderation practices vary.
Editorial Code
—
No editorial guidelines or content standards document accessible from provided page data.
Ownership
-0.05
Article 21
YouTube is a Google/Alphabet subsidiary. Commercial entity with centralized content control and enforcement policies.
Access Model
+0.10
Article 19 Article 27
Free, ad-supported access model enables broad participation. Monetization features available to creators. No paywall blocking video access in standard mode.
Ad/Tracking
-0.20
Article 12
Extensive ad tracking systems visible: Privacy Sandbox APIs, audience measurement, behavioral targeting configs. Users' viewing behavior is tracked and profiled.
Score Breakdown
+0.10
PreamblePreamble
Low Practice
Editorial
ND
Structural
+0.15
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Page structure enables global communication but inherent tracking and commercial control create friction with dignity principles.
Observable Facts
HTML declares multi-language support via lang attribute 'en-GB' and Roboto font stack suitable for international use.
Page loads multiple localization and configuration systems enabling content delivery across regions.
Inferences
Global accessibility infrastructure suggests commitment to information distribution across borders.
Centralized configuration control and telemetry indicates hierarchical rather than peer-based governance model.
+0.15
Article 1Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood
Low Practice
Editorial
ND
Structural
+0.20
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Platform enables equal participation regardless of status but algorithm-driven visibility creates de facto hierarchies.
Observable Facts
Video watch page accessible via standard URL without authentication requirement indicated in provided HTML.
No role-based access restrictions visible in page structure for public videos.
Inferences
Open video access suggests formal equality in viewing rights.
Algorithm-driven recommendations (referenced in experiment configs) may create informal discrimination in visibility.
-0.35
Article 2Non-Discrimination
Medium Practice
Editorial
ND
Structural
-0.25
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Platform enforces community standards through centralized moderation, but implementation varies and appeals process not transparent from page structure.
Observable Facts
Page configuration includes experiment flags for content filtering and enforcement systems (e.g., 'disable_features_for_supex').
YouTube's content policy enforcement is mentioned in internal flags but no discrimination policy link visible on page.
Inferences
Centralized moderation suggests systematic content control that may inadvertently discriminate based on protected characteristics.
Opacity of enforcement mechanisms limits user ability to contest decisions based on protected status.
0.00
Article 3Life, Liberty, Security
Low
Editorial
ND
Structural
0.00
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Video page does not contain information about personal security or safety guarantees.
-0.30
Article 4No Slavery
Medium Practice
Editorial
ND
Structural
-0.20
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Centralized platform design enables broad restriction of user freedoms through terms of service and algorithmic enforcement.
Observable Facts
Page configuration includes content moderation flags and removal systems integrated into platform architecture.
User account restrictions and feature disabling capabilities are built into system configuration.
Inferences
Structural capacity for arbitrary restriction of user participation is embedded in platform design.
Enforcement appears unilateral without explicit due process mechanism visible on page.
-0.45
Article 5No Torture
Medium Practice
Editorial
ND
Structural
-0.35
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Platform architecture enables content removal, account suspension, and data collection without explicit safeguards against abuse visible in page structure.
Observable Facts
Error handling and enforcement systems are pre-configured with removal capabilities (error logging for policy violations).
Page contains extensive telemetry collection without visible user consent mechanism in provided HTML.
Inferences
Centralized enforcement power without transparent appeal process creates risk of arbitrary degrading treatment.
Data collection practices appear mandatory rather than consensual based on script loading.
0.00
Article 6Legal Personhood
Low
Editorial
ND
Structural
0.00
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Video page does not address personhood or legal rights documentation.
-0.30
Article 7Equality Before Law
Medium Practice
Editorial
ND
Structural
-0.20
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Platform enforcement inconsistencies and lack of transparent appeal mechanism suggest unequal protection under platform rules.
Observable Facts
Content moderation systems are configured with multiple enforcement pathways and flags but no visible appeal process on page.
User restriction capabilities are embedded across configuration with no proportionality constraints visible.
Inferences
Absence of visible due process protections suggests potential for unequal treatment in enforcement.
Centralized decision-making without transparency creates vulnerability to discriminatory application.
0.00
Article 8Right to Remedy
Low
Editorial
ND
Structural
0.00
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Video page does not contain information about constitutional rights or national legal protections.
-0.45
Article 9No Arbitrary Detention
High Practice
Editorial
ND
Structural
-0.30
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Platform has architectural capacity for account suspension, video removal, and content demotion without appeal process visible to users.
Observable Facts
Page configuration includes comprehensive enforcement system with flags for account restrictions (e.g., 'disable_features_for_supex').
Error handling system automatically logs and processes policy violations with removal capabilities.
Moderation decisions appear to be implemented unilaterally without transparent user notification in page structure.
Inferences
Automated enforcement architecture enables arbitrary deprivation of platform access.
Lack of visible appeal mechanism on page suggests users cannot challenge platform enforcement decisions.
Pre-configured restriction capabilities indicate systemic capacity for arbitrary action against users.
-0.35
Article 10Fair Hearing
Medium Practice
Editorial
ND
Structural
-0.25
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Video page lacks evidence of independent tribunal or fair hearing mechanism for content disputes.
Observable Facts
Page structure does not expose appeals process, dispute resolution contact, or independent review board links.
Enforcement is centralized through platform systems with no visible third-party arbitration.
Error responses are routed to platform's own logging system without external oversight mechanism.
Centralized enforcement without visible appeal process contradicts fair trial principles.
Platform serves as judge, jury, and executor of its own policies without external accountability.
-0.25
Article 11Presumption of Innocence
Low Practice
Editorial
ND
Structural
-0.20
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Page does not clarify presumption of innocence in content moderation or accusation procedures.
Observable Facts
Enforcement flags are configured to restrict content automatically without visible user notification of accusation.
Error handling system logs violations without evidence of prior notice to affected user.
Inferences
Automated enforcement architecture suggests reactive rather than predictive moderation, consistent with presumption of compliance.
Lack of accusation clarity suggests users may not understand why content is restricted until after removal.
-0.85
Article 12Privacy
High Practice Coverage
Editorial
-0.50
Structural
-0.65
SETL
+0.31
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Extensive telemetry, ad tracking, and behavioral profiling with minimal user consent visible. Page implements Privacy Sandbox APIs and performance monitoring without clear opt-out mechanism.
Observable Facts
Page loads Google Analytics, performance metrics collection, and audience measurement systems automatically.
Privacy Sandbox API origin trial is active (PrivacySandboxAdsAPIs token present in meta tag).
Ad tracking configuration includes behavioral data collection, user cohort analysis, and conversion tracking.
Error tracking system collects detailed JavaScript execution data without visible consent banner.
Performance monitoring continuously collects page load times, interaction data, and user behavior metrics.
No cookie consent banner or privacy preference center visible in provided HTML head.
Inferences
Automatic loading of tracking systems suggests telemetry is mandatory rather than optional.
Privacy Sandbox implementation indicates integration of third-party behavioral data collection.
Absence of privacy controls in initial page load suggests data collection occurs before user consent can be sought.
Detailed event tracking across page interactions enables comprehensive behavioral profiling.
+0.30
Article 13Freedom of Movement
Medium Practice
Editorial
ND
Structural
+0.25
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Platform enables movement of video content across regions and languages, though geofencing and local enforcement may limit access in some territories.
Observable Facts
Video page is accessible globally without geofencing visible in page HTML.
Multi-language configuration system is built into page structure.
Content distribution network (CDN) references suggest global availability infrastructure.
Inferences
Global accessibility infrastructure enables free movement of information across borders.
Centralized enforcement systems may restrict content in specific jurisdictions despite global distribution capability.
Language support indicates intended accessibility across regions but does not guarantee local availability.
+0.10
Article 14Asylum
Low Practice
Editorial
ND
Structural
+0.10
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Page does not contain information about asylum or refuge status recognition.
Observable Facts
Video page accessible globally suggests platform does not discriminate access based on immigration status.
No legal status requirements visible in authentication mechanism.
Inferences
Open access model suggests platform does not require citizenship or legal residency.
Lack of status-based restrictions in structural design implies equal access regardless of legal standing.
-0.10
Article 15Nationality
Low Practice
Editorial
ND
Structural
-0.10
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Page does not directly address nationality rights but platform's centralized US-based enforcement may affect national sovereignty perception.
Observable Facts
Platform is operated by US-based company (Google/Alphabet) with centralized policy enforcement.
Content policies applied uniformly across jurisdictions regardless of local legal frameworks.
Inferences
Centralized enforcement by foreign entity may create perception of external sovereignty constraints.
Uniform global policies may conflict with local nationality rights in some jurisdictions.
-0.30
Article 16Marriage & Family
Medium Practice
Editorial
ND
Structural
-0.20
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Extensive data collection enables comprehensive family/private life profiling; no visible privacy protections in page structure.
Observable Facts
Page collects viewing history data tied to user accounts (if logged in).
Performance monitoring tracks page interaction patterns and engagement metrics.
Ad targeting systems profile user interests and behaviors for audience segmentation.
Error tracking collects detailed interaction data from JavaScript execution.
No mechanism visible to prevent family members' viewing data from being linked to account.
Inferences
Viewing history tracking enables detailed profiling of private information consumption.
Account-linked data collection means family members' viewing habits may be visible to primary account holder or YouTube.
Behavioral profiling data could reveal sensitive personal information about private life preferences.
Minimal privacy controls suggest limited ability to protect family/private life data from collection.
-0.45
Article 17Property
Medium Practice
Editorial
ND
Structural
-0.30
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Platform's data collection and centralized enforcement create risk of arbitrary property deprivation through account suspension or content removal.
Observable Facts
Account suspension systems are configured with capability to restrict access to user's uploaded content and monetization.
Video removal can occur without visible compensation mechanism or due process.
Creator earnings can be withheld through account restrictions built into configuration.
No property rights safeguards or compensation policies visible in page structure.
Inferences
Platform enforcement can deprive creators of property (videos, earnings) without due process.
Monetization systems can be disabled unilaterally, depriving creators of expected income.
Account suspension mechanism enables seizure of all platform assets without visible appeal or compensation.
+0.38
Article 18Freedom of Thought
Medium Advocacy Practice
Editorial
+0.30
Structural
+0.25
SETL
+0.12
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Platform enables freedom of thought and conscience through diverse content creation and consumption, though algorithmic curation may limit exposure to alternative viewpoints.
Observable Facts
Page structure enables users to upload and share diverse video content without viewpoint-based content requirements.
Recommendation algorithm configurations exist but specific ideological constraints are not visible in page flags.
Video recommendations prioritize engagement rather than ideological alignment based on visible experiment settings.
Inferences
Open publishing model suggests platform does not impose thought or conscience constraints at upload.
Algorithmic curation may filter exposure to diverse viewpoints despite not explicitly restricting publication.
Absence of ideological filters suggests platform is relatively neutral on thought expression at creation stage.
+0.43
Article 19Freedom of Expression
Medium Advocacy Practice
Editorial
+0.40
Structural
+0.35
SETL
+0.14
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Platform significantly enables freedom of opinion and expression globally through video publishing, though content moderation restricts certain speech and algorithmic ranking limits visibility.
Observable Facts
Video page is publicly accessible and can be shared without login requirements.
Upload mechanism (visible in navigation) enables users to publish opinions and information without pre-publication review indicated in page structure.
Global CDN infrastructure enables rapid distribution of published content across regions.
Captions and transcript systems enable accessibility of opinions to diverse audiences.
Inferences
Open publishing architecture demonstrates commitment to enabling broad expression.
Global distribution infrastructure removes traditional barriers to opinion dissemination.
Content moderation systems do restrict certain speech, limiting absolute freedom but not eliminating it.
Algorithmic ranking may limit visibility of opinions without preventing publication.
+0.23
Article 20Assembly & Association
Medium Advocacy Practice
Editorial
+0.25
Structural
+0.20
SETL
+0.11
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Platform enables peaceful assembly through community features, live chat, and comments, though moderation restricts disruptive speech.
Observable Facts
Live chat system is referenced in page configuration enabling real-time community interaction.
Comments section enables discussion and assembly around video content.
Community tab (referenced in feature flags) enables creator-to-audience assembly.
Moderation system filters content to prevent harassment while enabling peaceful discussion.
Inferences
Community features directly support peaceful assembly and association.
Moderation protects peaceful assembly from being disrupted by harassment.
Scale of platform enables large-scale peaceful gathering around shared interests.
Restrictions on disruptive speech are necessary to protect peaceful assembly of others.
-0.36
Article 21Political Participation
Medium Practice
Editorial
-0.20
Structural
-0.30
SETL
+0.17
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Platform is centrally controlled by private corporation with limited transparency in decision-making and governance processes.
Observable Facts
Platform is operated by YouTube (Google subsidiary), a private corporation with centralized control.
Content policy decisions are made by YouTube staff without visible user participation in governance.
No voting mechanisms, user councils, or participatory decision-making structures visible in page architecture.
Policy enforcement is unilateral without transparent deliberation or stakeholder input visible in page structure.
Inferences
Private corporate ownership concentrates power over speech and association decisions.
Absence of participatory governance mechanisms means users cannot meaningfully influence platform policies.
Centralized decision-making contradicts principles of democratic participation in governance of public discourse.
Lack of transparency in policy formation limits user ability to participate in governance.
+0.08
Article 22Social Security
Low Practice
Editorial
+0.10
Structural
+0.05
SETL
+0.07
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Platform enables participation in cultural and information life but does not explicitly address social security or welfare provision.
Observable Facts
Platform provides free access to diverse cultural, educational, and informational content.
Creator monetization features enable some economic participation for content creators.
No social welfare or security features visible in page structure.
Inferences
Free access to information and culture enables participation in cultural life.
Monetization features enable limited economic participation for successful creators.
Platform does not address social security or welfare aspects of Article 22.
+0.13
Article 23Work & Equal Pay
Low Practice
Editorial
+0.15
Structural
+0.10
SETL
+0.09
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Creator monetization enables work and economic participation, though platform takes percentage and restricts access to monetization based on arbitrary thresholds.
Observable Facts
Creator monetization programs are available to qualifying channels.
Platform takes percentage of creator revenue from monetization.
No wage guarantees or employment protections visible; creator payment is algorithmic and variable.
Inferences
Monetization enables work participation but does not constitute employment with protections.
Revenue-sharing model means creators bear economic risk entirely.
Arbitrary monetization thresholds may restrict work opportunities for new creators.
Lack of stable income guarantees contradicts right to fair wages.
0.00
Article 24Rest & Leisure
Low
Editorial
ND
Structural
0.00
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Video page does not address rest, leisure, or working hours.
+0.18
Article 25Standard of Living
Medium Advocacy Practice
Editorial
+0.20
Structural
+0.15
SETL
+0.10
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Platform provides access to diverse health, educational, and informational content enabling standard of living improvements, though does not directly provide healthcare or social services.
Observable Facts
Platform hosts educational, medical, and health-related content created by experts and educators.
Captions and transcript systems enable accessibility for disabled users.
Video quality controls enable access for users with limited bandwidth.
Accessibility features (keyboard navigation, screen reader support) are built into platform architecture.
No healthcare or social service provision visible; platform is informational only.
Inferences
Educational and health content enables users to improve understanding of well-being and living standards.
Accessibility features demonstrate commitment to serving users with disabilities.
Platform enables access to health information but does not substitute for healthcare services.
Informational role supports but does not fulfill social security and welfare requirements of Article 25.
+0.33
Article 26Education
Medium Advocacy Practice
Editorial
+0.30
Structural
+0.25
SETL
+0.12
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Platform provides extensive educational content and learning tools, though does not replace formal education institutions or guarantee educational access.
Observable Facts
Platform hosts educational content from universities, teachers, and subject matter experts.
Structured learning playlists and educational channels enable sequential learning.
Transcript and caption systems support learning accessibility.
Free access removes financial barriers to educational content consumption.
Platform does not provide credentials or formal educational certification.
Inferences
Free access to educational content reduces barriers to learning.
Diverse educator participation enables pluralistic educational perspectives.
Lack of formal credentialing means platform supports but does not substitute for formal education.
Self-directed learning model requires user motivation; platform enables but does not mandate education.
+0.23
Article 27Cultural Participation
Medium Advocacy Practice
Editorial
+0.25
Structural
+0.20
SETL
+0.11
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Platform enables participation in cultural and scientific advancement through content creation and consumption, though copyright restrictions and centralized control limit some participation.
Observable Facts
Platform enables creators to publish scientific, artistic, and cultural content globally.
Educational and scientific channels share research and discoveries broadly.
Creator tools enable artistic expression and cultural contribution.
Copyright enforcement prevents unauthorized reproduction, protecting creators and creators' rights.
Inferences
Open publishing enables broad participation in cultural and scientific advancement.
Centralized platform control may limit alternative artistic or scientific expression that violates policies.
Broad audience enables significant impact on cultural and scientific advancement.
-0.45
Article 28Social & International Order
Medium Practice
Editorial
-0.25
Structural
-0.35
SETL
+0.19
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Platform's centralized enforcement, lack of transparent due process, and minimal appeal mechanisms create structural barriers to establishing social and international order supporting UDHR rights.
Observable Facts
Platform enforcement is unilateral without visible appeal process or independent review.
Content policies are applied globally without jurisdiction-specific adaptation.
No human rights impact assessments or civil rights safeguards visible in page configuration.
Policy violations result in automatic enforcement without user notification of rights or remedies.
No international human rights framework visible in platform governance structure.
Inferences
Lack of independent review mechanisms means platform cannot establish impartial social order.
Absence of human rights impact assessment suggests platform does not systematically uphold UDHR principles.
Centralized enforcement without local adaptation may violate rights in some jurisdictions.
Minimal due process protections contradict requirement to establish international order supporting rights.
-0.28
Article 29Duties to Community
Medium Practice
Editorial
-0.20
Structural
-0.25
SETL
+0.11
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Platform restrictions on speech and content, while aimed at preventing harm, lack proportionality safeguards and transparent justification, creating risk of rights restriction beyond necessity.
Observable Facts
Content moderation policies restrict speech on topics like violence, harassment, and policy-defined harmful speech.
Restriction mechanisms are pre-configured but no visible proportionality review or necessity testing.
Policy enforcement applies globally without jurisdiction-specific adaptation of restrictions.
Appeal process is not visible in page structure, limiting ability to contest necessity of restrictions.
Inferences
Necessary restrictions on harmful speech are justified but lack proportionality review.
Uniform global policy may restrict more speech than necessary in some jurisdictions.
Absence of transparent justification for restrictions suggests they may exceed necessity.
Lack of appeal mechanism prevents users from challenging whether restrictions are proportional to harm prevented.
-0.48
Article 30No Destruction of Rights
Medium Practice
Editorial
-0.30
Structural
-0.35
SETL
+0.13
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Platform's centralized control and enforcement mechanisms enable interpretation of rights to restrict them, contrary to Article 30's prohibition on destruction of rights.
Observable Facts
Platform can suspend accounts, remove content, and restrict monetization based on policy interpretation.
Policy enforcement does not require user consent and cannot be easily exited.
Content moderation policies are interpreted unilaterally without user input or contestation.
Account suspension removes access to all platform rights simultaneously without proportional escalation.
Inferences
Unilateral policy interpretation enables platform to define rights away through enforcement.
Lack of proportionality in enforcement (total account suspension rather than graduated restrictions) destroys rights rather than limiting them.
Mandatory participation (inability to opt-out of data collection or enforcement) prevents users from maintaining rights protections.
Centralized control enables systematic limitation of all Article 29-protected rights through single policy action.