Structural signals show commercial payment model and tracking infrastructure that constrain foundational human dignity principles embedded in Preamble; no editorial advocacy observed.

Equal dignity principle undermined by subscription paywall that creates access hierarchy based on economic capacity; no editorial content on equality detected.

Non-discrimination principle affected by access model; tracking practices may enable discriminatory targeting. Responsive design shows some accessibility consideration but JavaScript-dependency creates exclusion.

Right to life and security undermined by data practices; extensive tracking could expose user data to security risks.

Slavery/servitude not directly observed. Commercial data collection practices create asymmetric power dynamics.

Torture/cruel treatment not applicable. However, commercial exploitation and data practices create harms through asymmetric power.

Right to recognition as person not directly implicated; no editorial content on legal personhood.

Equal protection principle violated by subscription-based access discrimination and targeted tracking practices.

Right to judicial remedy not directly observable in subscription landing page context.

Arbitrary detention principle not directly applicable; however, data systems create arbitrary surveillance capability.

Fair trial principle not directly implicated in subscription landing page.

Criminal liability principle; not directly applicable to commercial subscription service.

Privacy violation is clear and extensive. Multiple tracking systems (Amplitude, GTM, oTracking, session replay, device ID) operate without visible user control. This is a strong negative signal.

Freedom of movement not applicable to online content subscription platform.

Asylum principle not applicable; however, subscription model creates barriers similar to immigration restrictions.

Nationality principle not directly applicable to commercial subscription service.

Marriage/family rights not applicable; subscription model treats individuals as economic units rather than members of families.

Property rights principle affected by data collection. Users' behavioral data is extracted and monetized without compensation.

Freedom of thought and conscience not directly implicated; however, behavioral tracking creates surveillance of thought patterns.

Freedom of expression/opinion compromised by paywall access control and tracking-based filtering. Users cannot freely access information; algorithms may filter based on tracked profiles.

Peaceful assembly principle not applicable to online subscription service.

Participation in government principle not applicable; however, commercial entity wields significant information power without democratic accountability.

Social security/cultural participation principle affected by subscription paywall that restricts access to cultural/intellectual content based on economic capacity.

Work and fair conditions principle not directly applicable; however, platform business model creates exploitative labor dynamics (unpaid content creation through tracking).

Rest and leisure principle affected by constant tracking and engagement optimization.

Adequate standard of living principle significantly violated by subscription paywall that restricts access to information essential for informed participation in society. This creates economic exclusion from intellectual resources.

Education principle compromised by paywall. Access to information essential for intellectual development is restricted by financial barriers.

Cultural/scientific participation principle affected by subscription paywall that restricts access to analysis of cultural and scientific matters.

Social and international order principle affected by proprietary data systems that create extractive relationship between platform and users.

Community development principle compromised by subscription paywall that fragments users into paying/non-paying tiers. Tracking creates surveillance rather than genuine community participation.

Protection against destruction of rights principle: The subscription/surveillance model itself could be seen as limiting the possibility of exercising other rights. System designs that prevent rights exercise create de facto destruction.