Content appears freely accessible; no paywall, registration, or metering observed. Supports non-discriminatory access to information.
Ad/Tracking
—
No advertising or tracking pixels observed in HTML; minimal analytics footprint.
Score Breakdown
+0.13
PreamblePreamble
Low Framing
Editorial
+0.15
Structural
+0.10
SETL
+0.09
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Article frames LLM capability benchmarking as a neutral technical exercise. No explicit engagement with human dignity, freedom, or welfare themes. Mild positive: technical transparency and intellectual honesty (acknowledging limitations, costs, caveats).
Observable Facts
Author explicitly states 'What this doesn't tell us' section listing limitations: no brownfield code, no libraries/frameworks, incomplete concurrency coverage.
Page transparently reports methodology, costs ($220), and invites scrutiny of results.
Author acknowledges subjective metrics are 'probably the least definitive' and warrant skepticism.
Inferences
Transparent reporting of methods and limitations supports informed public discourse, which aligns with Preamble values of reason and dialogue.
Technical humility and explicit caveating suggests respect for reader autonomy to form their own judgment.
ND
Article 1Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood
No observable engagement with innate dignity, equality, or reason/conscience themes.
ND
Article 2Non-Discrimination
Content does not address discrimination or entitlement based on status.
ND
Article 3Life, Liberty, Security
No observable engagement with security or personhood.
ND
Article 4No Slavery
Content does not address slavery or servitude.
ND
Article 5No Torture
Content does not address torture or cruel treatment.
ND
Article 6Legal Personhood
Content does not address right to recognition as a person.
ND
Article 7Equality Before Law
Content does not address equality before law.
ND
Article 8Right to Remedy
Content does not address judicial remedy.
ND
Article 9No Arbitrary Detention
Content does not address arbitrary arrest or detention.
ND
Article 10Fair Hearing
Content does not address fair trial or impartial tribunal.
ND
Article 11Presumption of Innocence
Content does not address criminal liability or presumption of innocence.
ND
Article 12Privacy
Content does not address privacy or interference with correspondence.
ND
Article 13Freedom of Movement
Content does not address freedom of movement.
ND
Article 14Asylum
Content does not address asylum or persecution.
ND
Article 15Nationality
Content does not address nationality.
ND
Article 16Marriage & Family
Content does not address marriage or family.
ND
Article 17Property
Content does not address property rights.
ND
Article 18Freedom of Thought
Content does not address freedom of thought, conscience, or religion.
+0.45
Article 19Freedom of Expression
Medium Advocacy Framing
Editorial
+0.30
Structural
+0.35
SETL
-0.13
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Content actively demonstrates and advocates for freedom of expression, opinion, and information-seeking. Public technical blog with open methodology, freely accessible, transparent reporting. Author proactively shares methodology, limitations, raw data (via GitHub links). Responsive design and accessibility measures support broad audience access. Context modifiers: accessibility (+0.05) and free access model (+0.08) both reinforce Article 19 values.
Observable Facts
Blog post is publicly accessible without login, paywall, or registration barrier.
Author provides full links to GitHub repository containing tasks, code, and rubrics for independent verification.
Page includes explicit 'What this doesn't tell us' section where author documents methodological gaps and invites reader skepticism.
HTML includes proper heading hierarchy, ARIA labels, dark/light mode toggle, and semantic structure supporting diverse user access.
Inferences
Free, open access to technical methodology and results supports public discourse and informed decision-making about AI capabilities.
Transparent documentation of limitations and costs demonstrates respect for reader autonomy to evaluate claims independently.
Accessibility features and multiple access paths suggest commitment to inclusive communication rather than gatekeeping information.
ND
Article 20Assembly & Association
Content does not address freedom of assembly or association.
ND
Article 21Political Participation
Content does not address political participation.
ND
Article 22Social Security
Content does not address social security or welfare.
ND
Article 23Work & Equal Pay
Content does not address employment or labor rights.
ND
Article 24Rest & Leisure
Content does not address rest, leisure, or working hours.
ND
Article 25Standard of Living
Content does not address food, housing, health, or standard of living.
+0.30
Article 26Education
Low Framing
Editorial
+0.20
Structural
+0.25
SETL
-0.11
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Content subtly supports Article 26 values through open access to technical knowledge and transparent methodology. Educational value in public understanding of AI capabilities and limitations. However, no explicit framing as education/learning resource. Context modifier: free access model (+0.08) supports educational equity.
Observable Facts
Blog post documents detailed methodology, task specifications, and benchmark results freely accessible to any reader.
Author references and links to external learning resources (Wikipedia articles on CSP, Hindley-Milner type system, Wikipedia entry on TMTOWTDI).
Inferences
Public technical documentation supports self-directed learning and public knowledge-building about AI capabilities.
Free access model removes economic barriers to accessing knowledge about language model performance across programming languages.
ND
Article 27Cultural Participation
Content does not address participation in cultural life or intellectual property.
ND
Article 28Social & International Order
Content does not address social/international order or economic systems.
+0.08
Article 29Duties to Community
Low Framing
Editorial
+0.10
Structural
+0.05
SETL
+0.07
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Content exhibits mild commitment to Article 29 responsibilities through transparent methodology and intellectual honesty. Author acknowledges limitations and costs, inviting reader judgment. However, no explicit engagement with duties, responsibilities, or community welfare themes. Neutral framing; technical exercise rather than normative statement.
Observable Facts
Author transparently reports $220 cost to readers, inviting cost-benefit analysis.
Section 'What this doesn't tell us' explicitly identifies limitations and gaps in benchmark scope.
Inferences
Transparency about costs and limitations suggests acknowledgment of responsibility to inform others accurately.
Honest caveating demonstrates respect for reader's right to form independent judgments rather than prescribing conclusions.
ND
Article 30No Destruction of Rights
Content does not address restrictions on interpretation or permitted limitations.