| |
|
| Article Heatmap Negative Neutral Positive No Data | Aggregates | Weighted Mean | +0.27 | Unweighted Mean | +0.29 | | Max | +0.73 Article 19 | Min | +0.10 Article 24 | | Signal | 17 | No Data | 14 | | Confidence | ND | Volatility | 0.18 (Low) | | Negative | 0 | Channels | E: 0.4 S: 0.6 | | SETL | -0.06 | Structural-dominant | | FW Ratio | 60% | 0 facts · 0 inferences | Evidence: High: 1 Medium: 8 Low: 8 No Data: 14 | Theme Radar | | Domain Context Profile | Element | Modifier | Affects | Note | | Privacy | +0.05 | Article 12 | Referrer policy and basic privacy headers present; no tracking cookie consent visible on page | | Terms of Service | — | | Link to legal terms present but not evaluated on this page | | Accessibility | — | | Basic semantic HTML structure present; no ARIA labels or alt text observed | | Mission | +0.10 | Article 19 Article 27 | Hacker News explicitly supports free expression, open discourse, and meritocratic discussion of ideas | | Editorial Code | +0.08 | Article 19 Article 20 | Guidelines emphasize civility and rejection of flamewars; moderation supports constructive discourse | | Ownership | — | | Y Combinator ownership; commercial entity but non-paywalled platform | | Access Model | +0.12 | Article 19 Article 27 | Public access to discussion without paywall or registration requirement; open API available | | Ad/Tracking | -0.05 | Article 12 | Minimal visible tracking; no aggressive ad ecosystem observed on page | | | Score Breakdown +0.38 Medium Framing Community platform frames discourse as dignified exchange of ideas; open access model supports equal participation Observable Facts - Platform provides open discussion forum without paywall or registration barrier
- Guidelines link visible emphasizing community standards for respectful discourse
- Page allows anonymous and registered users to participate equally in submissions and comments
Inferences - Open access design signals commitment to universal participation regardless of economic status
- Emphasis on guidelines suggests recognition that human dignity in discourse requires structure
+0.33 Article 1 Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood Medium Framing Platform treats all users as equal participants regardless of status; merit-based visibility of contributions Observable Facts - Voting system applies equally to all submissions and comments regardless of user account age or history
- User account display shows submitter's reputation score publicly, creating equal visibility baseline
Inferences - Merit-based voting system reflects principle that all humans deserve equal consideration of their ideas
+0.15 Article 2 Non-Discrimination Low Practice No observable discrimination markers; platform permits users of any background to participate Observable Facts - No identity verification requirement visible; usernames do not require demographic disclosure
Inferences - Lack of identity-gating suggests non-discriminatory access regardless of protected characteristics
ND Article 3 Life, Liberty, Security No observable content addressing security or personhood ND No observable content related to slavery or servitude ND No observable content addressing torture or degrading treatment ND Article 6 Legal Personhood No observable content addressing right to recognition as person before law +0.15 Article 7 Equality Before Law Low Practice Platform treats all users equally under stated community guidelines Observable Facts - Same commenting rules and voting mechanisms apply to all users regardless of status
Inferences - Equal application of community rules to all participants reflects non-discriminatory principle
ND Article 8 Right to Remedy No observable content addressing legal remedies for rights violations ND Article 9 No Arbitrary Detention No observable content addressing arbitrary detention ND No observable content addressing fair trial or legal process on this page ND Article 11 Presumption of Innocence No observable content addressing criminal charges or presumption of innocence +0.23 Low Practice Basic privacy protections observable; referrer policy limiting cross-site tracking; no aggressive data collection visible on page Observable Facts - Meta referrer tag set to 'origin' limiting information leakage to external sites
- No visible cookie consent banner or third-party tracking pixels on comment page
- User submissions do not require email verification visible in interface
Inferences - Referrer policy suggests awareness of privacy as right worthy of protection
- Minimal visible tracking suggests less invasive data collection than typical commercial platforms
+0.33 Article 13 Freedom of Movement Medium Practice Platform explicitly permits free movement of ideas and users across discussion threads; no geographic restrictions visible Observable Facts - Users can freely navigate between discussions, comment globally on any submission
- No geo-blocking or IP-based access restrictions visible in interface
Inferences - Unrestricted global access to discussions reflects freedom of movement principle
ND No observable content addressing asylum or refugee rights ND No observable content addressing nationality ND Article 16 Marriage & Family No observable content addressing marriage or family rights +0.10 Low Practice Platform does not mandate public display of user property or economic information Observable Facts - User accounts display reputation score but not personal wealth or property information
Inferences - Separation of discourse identity from economic data suggests protection of property privacy
+0.43 Article 18 Freedom of Thought Medium Practice Framing Platform explicitly permits diverse viewpoints and does not mandate ideological conformity in discussions; design supports pluralism Observable Facts - Comment section allows diverse technical and ideological perspectives without pre-moderation visible
- Guidelines link available but does not indicate censorship of viewpoint diversity
- No requirement for users to adopt platform-approved positions on any topic
Inferences - Open comment architecture reflects commitment to freedom of thought and conscience
- Absence of viewpoint-based pre-moderation suggests protection of ideological diversity
+0.73 Article 19 Freedom of Expression High Advocacy Practice Platform's core function is to facilitate free expression and information sharing; structural design heavily prioritizes this right Observable Facts - Page provides submission and comment forms without content pre-approval requirement
- Public discussion visible to all users regardless of login status for reading
- Voting and ranking system makes speech visible proportionally to community interest
- No keyword filtering or automatic content removal visible in interface
- Guidelines link available but emphasizes norms rather than content prohibition
Inferences - Design architecture treating speech as primary platform function demonstrates strong commitment to Article 19
- Public visibility of all discussions reflects belief that unrestricted expression strengthens discourse
- Merit-based visibility through voting respects speaker agency without censoring content
+0.46 Article 20 Assembly & Association Medium Advocacy Practice Platform permits formation of discussion communities and collective participation; moderation guidelines support peaceful assembly Observable Facts - Users can form discussion threads and aggregate around shared interests
- Guidelines visible emphasizing no flamewars or harassment, supporting peaceful assembly
- Voting allows collective signal of interest in topics without requiring administrative approval
Inferences - Allowance of user-initiated discussion grouping reflects support for freedom of assembly
- Anti-harassment moderation policy suggests commitment to protecting peaceful assembly from disruption
+0.18 Article 21 Political Participation Low Practice Platform permits user participation in discourse governance through voting and discussion, though governance is primarily administrative Observable Facts - User voting system creates indirect input mechanism for content visibility
- Community guidelines available for user feedback through discussion
Inferences - Voting system provides limited but observable form of user participation in content governance
+0.18 Article 22 Social Security Low Practice Platform does not exclude users from participation based on social or economic status Observable Facts - No payment or financial barrier to read or participate in discussions
- Account creation requires no proof of employment, education, or social status
Inferences - Free access model removes economic barriers to social participation
+0.13 Article 23 Work & Equal Pay Low Practice Discussion topic includes employment and investment seeking, but platform itself does not regulate labor rights Observable Facts - Current discussion post about finding investors for game project; demonstrates platform allows employment-related speech
Inferences - Permitting discussion of employment and investment seeking respects economic autonomy
ND Article 24 Rest & Leisure No observable content addressing rest or leisure rights ND Article 25 Standard of Living No observable content addressing health or social security ND No observable content addressing education +0.58 Article 27 Cultural Participation Medium Advocacy Practice Platform explicitly supports participation in cultural and scientific discourse; the entire design facilitates collective knowledge creation Observable Facts - Discussion forum aggregates diverse technical, scientific, and cultural perspectives
- User submissions include game development project sharing knowledge and seeking collaborators
- No gatekeeping on who can contribute scientific or technical knowledge to discussions
Inferences - Open participation in technical discourse reflects commitment to shared scientific knowledge
- Permitting presentation of game engine research demonstrates support for participation in cultural creation
+0.13 Article 28 Social & International Order Low Practice Platform does not obstruct access to social order that protects rights; existence as public forum supports rights infrastructure Observable Facts - Legal, FAQ, and guidelines links provide transparency about platform's social order
Inferences - Visible governance documentation suggests commitment to operating within recognized social order
+0.18 Article 29 Duties to Community Low Practice Community guidelines outline duties and restrictions on speech, though enforcement is unclear; tension with absolute expression freedom Observable Facts - Guidelines link available suggesting stated restrictions on speech type and conduct
- Comment form present but no visible pre-moderation mechanism
Inferences - Existence of guidelines suggests recognition that rights exercise carries responsibilities toward others
+0.18 Article 30 No Destruction of Rights Low Practice Platform's terms prohibit weaponization of discourse against UDHR rights, though specific language not visible on this page Observable Facts - Security and Legal links present indicating terms restricting misuse
Inferences - Presence of security policy suggests protection against misuse of platform for rights violations
| |
| |