Framing around 'stateful AI runtimes' and 'persistent memory' suggests values of autonomy and self-determination (Preamble themes), but product-centric language lacks explicit human dignity framing.

Implicit framing around equality (diverse device support, open GitHub) and freedom (on-device processing) without explicit statement of equal dignity or rights.

No observable anti-discrimination language, policy, or structural safeguards specific to protected characteristics. Neutral device approach implies non-discrimination by design but lacks explicit statement.

Right to life, liberty, and security of person is implicitly supported by privacy-first architecture (on-device processing) and avoiding surveillance/control by remote systems. However, applications to defense systems and drones create potential conflict.

Slavery and servitude not addressed on landing page; no observable content related to forced labor or modern slavery prevention.

Torture and cruel treatment not addressed on landing page; no content related to harmful practices or safeguards against abuse.

Right to recognition before law not addressed on landing page; no legal personality or status content visible.

Equality before law and equal protection not explicitly addressed; no legal safeguards or anti-discrimination enforcement mechanisms visible.

Right to effective remedy for violations not addressed on landing page.

Arbitrary arrest and detention not addressed on landing page.

Fair and public hearing not addressed; no judicial or tribunal process content visible.

Presumption of innocence and criminal liability not addressed on landing page.

Right to privacy is directly supported by on-device processing architecture and 'private AI nodes' positioning. No arbitrary interference structures observed; design itself protects privacy.

Freedom of movement and residence supported by distributed device architecture (works on mobile, edge devices, etc.); no geographic restriction visible. Limited evidence due to product focus.

Right to seek asylum and protection not addressed on landing page; no refugee or persecution-related content.

Right to nationality not addressed on landing page.

Marriage and family rights not addressed on landing page.

Right to property and protection of ownership is implicitly supported by on-device processing (data ownership remains with user), but no explicit intellectual property or asset protection framework visible.

Freedom of thought, conscience, and religion supported by local processing that prevents external ideological manipulation or surveillance of beliefs. Limited explicit evidence.

Freedom of opinion and expression supported by decentralized, on-device architecture that prevents centralized censorship. GitHub repository enables open discussion and contribution.

Freedom of peaceful assembly and association supported by community structure and open-source model enabling collaborative participation, though no explicit safeguards visible.

Participation in government and voting rights not addressed on landing page; no political engagement content visible.

Social security and welfare rights not addressed on landing page.

Right to work and fair conditions not directly addressed; no labor rights or employment policy visible.

Right to rest and leisure not addressed on landing page.

Right to adequate standard of living (food, clothing, housing, medical care) indirectly supported by healthcare appliance roadmap item, but limited evidence and no explicit commitment to welfare or social support.

Right to education supported by education roadmap item and open-source GitHub model enabling learning. No explicit educational access or affordability policy visible.

Right to participate in cultural life and scientific progress strongly supported by open-source GitHub model, education/research roadmap, and broad deployment enabling access to AI technology across diverse contexts.

Right to social and international order supporting human rights is supported by open-source transparency and distributed architecture enabling independent verification and global cooperation, but no explicit human rights framework visible.

Article 29 concerns limitations on rights and freedoms. Roadmap applications to 'Defense Systems,' 'Drones,' and 'Law Enforcement' raise concerns about potential misuse for surveillance, control, or rights suppression without visible safeguards or accountability.

Prevention of destruction of human rights: no organization, state, or person should be permitted to destroy rights granted by UDHR. Roadmap mentions defense/military/law enforcement without visible safeguards against rights abuse.