Preamble invokes universal human dignity and equal rights of all members of human family. Article content does not directly address UDHR preamble themes. No observable signal.

Article 1 establishes equal dignity and rights of all humans. Content is financial analysis with no engagement with equality or dignity principles.

Non-discrimination principle. Content does not address discrimination by protected characteristic.

Right to life, liberty, security. Financial analysis does not engage with these fundamental rights.

Prohibition of slavery. Content does not address labor exploitation or slavery.

Prohibition of torture and cruel treatment. Financial market analysis does not engage with this right.

Right to recognition as person before law. Investment analysis does not address legal personhood.

Equality before law and equal protection. Financial analysis does not address legal equality.

Right to remedy for violation of fundamental rights. Article does not address access to justice.

Protection against arbitrary arrest. Investment analysis does not engage with due process rights.

Right to fair and impartial trial. Article does not address judicial fairness.

Presumption of innocence and protection against retroactive punishment. Financial analysis does not address criminal justice principles.

Right to privacy and protection against arbitrary interference with privacy. Editorial content does not explicitly discuss privacy. Structural signals: Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager present, indicating behavioral tracking. No cookie consent banner explicitly offered per SSR data (show_cookie_settings_link=false). Tracking practice suggests limited respect for privacy rights. Context modifier applies due to tracking infrastructure.

Freedom of movement. Financial analysis does not address mobility rights.

Right to asylum from persecution. Investment article does not engage with refugee or asylum principles.

Right to nationality. Article does not address nationality or statelessness.

Right to marry and found family. Financial analysis does not address family rights.

Right to property. Article discusses investment portfolios and market assets but not property rights as human right principle.

Freedom of thought, conscience, religion. Article does not address conscience or religious freedom.

Freedom of expression and opinion. Article provides analytical opinion on macroeconomic trends and AI disruption risk. Editorial: Offers critical framing of Citrini Research report (questions 'how worried should we be'), providing counterpoint analysis and investment perspective. Author states views are own opinions. Structural: Content is freely accessible without paywall (isLockedPro=false), supporting public access to information. Platform provides comment section (commentCount: 37) enabling reader expression. Positive signal for expression freedom, though opinion-driven rather than investigative.

Right to peaceful assembly and association. Financial analysis does not address assembly or association rights.

Right to participate in government and public affairs. Investment article does not address democratic participation.

Right to social security and economic security. Article discusses AI disruption and unemployment projection (over 10% per summary) but frames as market risk, not as challenge to social security rights.

Right to work, free choice of employment, just and favorable conditions. Article frames AI-driven automation and job displacement as market phenomenon to manage via portfolio strategy rather than labor rights issue. Summary states: 'AI is already impacting stocks' and author favors 'defensive sectors' rather than discussing worker protections or just working conditions. Modest negative framing: employment disruption treated as financial risk for investors, not human right concern.

Right to rest and leisure. Financial analysis does not address work-life balance or rest rights.

Right to adequate standard of living including food, housing, healthcare. Article addresses economic disruption (unemployment projection over 10%, S&P 500 decline) but frames entirely through investment lens. No discussion of social safety nets, healthcare access, or housing security as rights. Mild negative: treats potential economic contraction as portfolio management problem rather than threat to living standards and dignity.

Right to education. Article does not address educational access or opportunity.

Right to participate in cultural life and benefit from scientific progress. Article engages with AI technology disruption and scientific advancement (Anthropic tool, AI impact on sectors). Provides public analysis of technological change. Free access enables participation in understanding scientific-technological shifts. Mild positive: contributes to public understanding of technology and culture of innovation, though not explicitly framed as cultural participation right.

Right to social and international order where rights are realizable. Article does not address institutional or international rights frameworks.

Duties and responsibilities in community. Article does not address community duties or social responsibility.

Prohibition of state interference with rights. Article does not address state action or restriction of rights.