Platform structure enables information sharing but extensive tracking infrastructure undermines human dignity and freedom principles underlying UDHR.

Platform provides equal access to content globally without explicit discrimination visible in page structure, though algorithmic bias not directly observable from HTML.

Platform design does not explicitly discriminate in page structure, though algorithmic curation and content moderation policies not directly observable in provided HTML.

Platform enables existence and expression but does not explicitly address security or integrity protections in observable page structure.

No data on slavery/servitude protections observable in page HTML.

Platform contains systems that enable automated decision-making and surveillance mechanisms that could facilitate torture or degrading treatment detection and exploitation.

Platform structure provides recognition and legal status through user accounts and profile systems, though enforcement mechanisms not visible.

Platform architecture does not explicitly discriminate in law/protection mechanisms visible in page structure, though enforcement by YouTube moderation not observable.

Platform design systematically collects and exploits user data without explicit consent mechanisms visible in page structure. Combined with domain ownership by profit-driven corporation, creates structural violation of personal rights protection.

No direct evidence of arbitrary detention/arrest systems in page structure.

Platform provides access to legal proceedings (appeals, dispute resolution) through account management systems, though specific mechanisms not visible in provided HTML.

No data on presumption of innocence or criminal liability in page structure.

Platform structure systematically violates privacy protections through extensive tracking, surveillance, and data collection without meaningful user control or transparency.

Platform design enables freedom of movement through global access without geographic restrictions visible in page code, though content geoblocking not directly observable.

Platform provides asylum/refuge through content hosting capabilities, enabling creators from all jurisdictions to publish work without territorial restriction.

Platform provides access to information about nationalities and citizenship through creator profiles, though not primary function.

Platform design enables marital and family life documentation but surveillance systems create privacy risks for family information.

Platform structure systematically violates property rights through data extraction and algorithmic curation without creator compensation or control.

Platform enables freedom of thought and conscience through diverse content access and creator expression capabilities, though algorithmic curation may filter exposure.

Platform provides infrastructure for freedom of expression and information dissemination globally, enabling creators and viewers to share opinions and access diverse content. However, content moderation policies and algorithmic curation introduce limitations.

Platform enables freedom of assembly and association through community features and group formation capabilities.

Platform provides some infrastructure for political participation through content creation and information access, though not primary function.

Platform enables access to cultural and social rights through content discovery and participation in creator communities.

Platform creates employment opportunity through creator monetization but systematic data extraction and algorithmic control reduce worker autonomy and fair compensation.

No data on rest and leisure protections in page structure.

Platform provides infrastructure for health, education, and cultural participation through content access and creation tools. Accessibility infrastructure supports disabled users.

Platform provides some education infrastructure through content hosting but does not replace formal education systems.

Platform structure provides some cultural and intellectual participation infrastructure but systematically exploits creator intellectual property and user-generated content without adequate protection or compensation.

Platform provides some social order infrastructure through community guidelines but surveillance systems and algorithmic control undermine collective human rights protections.

Platform structure systematically limits individual freedom and community autonomy through algorithmic control, data extraction, and corporate governance prioritizing profit over human development.

Platform structure enables systematic interpretation of rights against the UDHR through data extraction, algorithmic control, and corporate profit prioritization that undermine fundamental freedoms and collective human dignity.