Editorial content strongly advocates for human dignity protection (privacy, security) and accountability. Structural access barrier (paywall) partially undermines information distribution intent of Preamble. Net positive due to substantive investigative work.

Article addresses equality of protection: all DJI users equally vulnerable to unauthorized access. Demonstrates that security breach undermines equal dignity. Paywall reduces structural score.

Non-discriminatory application of human rights not directly addressed in technical security article.

Security vulnerability enables remote monitoring of homes and camera feeds, directly threatening personal security and safe environment. Editorial treatment emphasizes this threat.

Slavery/servitude not relevant to this technical security article.

Torture/inhuman treatment not addressed in this article.

Recognition as person before law not directly relevant.

Article demonstrates unequal protection: all users subject to same vulnerability. Editorial emphasizes that data location (US vs. EU) does not prevent unauthorized access by employees anywhere. Addresses equality before law principle.

Core article theme: accessing remedies for security breach. Editorial extensively details DJI's inadequate initial response ('claimed it had fixed the vulnerability when it was actually only partially resolved'), gap between promises and delivery. Advocates for proper remedial action. High evidence of breach + slow remedy.

Arrest/detention not relevant.

Fair trial/judicial independence not directly addressed.

Presumption of innocence not relevant to technology security article.

Central to article: unauthorized access to home camera feeds, floor plans, real-time device location, and device status violates privacy in home and family life. Editorial extensively details scope of privacy violation and inadequacy of protections. Domain context modifier adds +0.1 for editorial mission emphasis on consumer privacy protection.

Article demonstrates freedom of movement impact: vulnerability exposed devices in 24 countries with no geographic protection. Security breach undermines safety of movement/residence. Moderate evidence of cross-border vulnerability affecting freedom.

Asylum/refuge not relevant to this article.

Nationality not addressed.

Security breach enables unauthorized surveillance of home and family space (camera feeds, floor plans, presence detection). Article advocates for protections of family life and domestic privacy. Article questions appropriateness of microphone on vacuum ('It's so weird to have a microphone on a freaking vacuum').

Security vulnerability enables mapping of home interior, viewing cameras, and remote control of devices—all directly threatening property rights and security. Editorial extensively documents this threat. Domain context: The Verge's consumer protection mission reinforces advocacy.

Freedom of thought/conscience/religion not addressed.

Article embodies Article 19 principles: seeking, receiving, and imparting information about security issue in public interest. Editorial demonstrates commitment to transparency ('sunlight is a good disinfectant'). Investigative journalism exposes facts independent of official claims. Paywall (structural) reduces accessibility. Domain context: Editorial mission and editorial standards modifiers +0.06 for investigative journalism exemplifying freedom of information.

Article documents peaceful assembly of evidence and criticism regarding DJI's response. Shows freedom to organize information sharing and criticism of corporate practices. Moderate evidence.

Article implicitly advocates for user participation in security decisions and transparency in how companies govern device data. Questions DJI's governance ('If Claude Code can spit out an app that lets you see into someone's house, what keeps a DJI employee from doing so?'). Moderate evidence of governance concerns.

Social security/cultural rights not directly addressed in technical security article.

Work/employment rights not primary focus, though mentions Azdoufal's role at vacation rental company.

Rest/leisure not addressed.

Security vulnerability undermines adequate standard of living in home through surveillance risk. Article demonstrates threat to health and wellbeing through unauthorized device access and monitoring. Paywall slightly reduces structural score.

Education rights not addressed in this article.

Article raises questions about fairness in participation in smart home technology benefits: 'For better or for worse, users currently expect those apps to work outside of their own homes.' Advocates for security standards that enable safe participation in technological advancement. Domain context: Accessibility signals +0.04.

Article documents failure of social/institutional order to protect security: DJI's inadequate response, industry-wide pattern of breaches (Ecovacs, Dreame, Wyze, Anker Eufy), lack of meaningful enforcement. Advocates for social order that ensures human rights protection. Domain context: Editorial mission emphasizing accountability +0.06.

Article extensively details DJI's failure in responsibility to protect user privacy and security. Demonstrates how organizations must balance innovation with rights protection. Moderate evidence of responsibility framework.

Prohibition on destruction of rights not directly addressed; article does not argue for restriction of rights.