Preamble concerns universal human dignity and equal rights. Article discusses consumer technology product review with no direct reference to foundational human dignity principles. No observable signal to UDHR Preamble.

Article 1 asserts universal equality and rationality of humans. Tech product review does not directly engage with equality or human dignity. No observable signal.

Article 2 protects against discrimination. Content is product review with no discussion of discrimination, protected characteristics, or equal treatment. No observable signal.

Article 3 concerns right to life, liberty, security. Tech review does not engage with these fundamental protections. No observable signal.

Article 4 prohibits slavery and servitude. Product review context does not implicate slavery or servitude. No observable signal.

Article 5 prohibits torture and cruel treatment. Tech review does not reference torture, cruelty, or inhumane treatment. No observable signal.

Article 6 protects right to legal personality. Consumer product review does not engage with legal personhood. No observable signal.

Article 7 protects equality before law. Tech review does not address legal equality or judicial processes. No observable signal.

Article 8 protects effective legal remedy. Product review does not address remedies or legal recourse. No observable signal.

Article 9 prohibits arbitrary arrest. Tech review context does not involve arrest or detention. No observable signal.

Article 10 protects fair trial rights. Product review does not engage with judicial fairness or trial rights. No observable signal.

Article 11 protects presumption of innocence and due process. Tech review does not involve criminal law or due process. No observable signal.

Article 12 protects privacy, family, and honor. Product review does not disclose personal data or infringe privacy. Author uses personal experience disclosures transparently. Neutral to mild positive on privacy respect, but no systematic HRCB signal. No data = ND.

Article 13 protects freedom of movement and residence. Tech review does not address movement or residence rights. No observable signal.

Article 14 protects asylum and refuge. Product review does not engage with asylum or refugee protection. No observable signal.

Article 15 protects nationality. Tech review does not address nationality or citizenship. No observable signal.

Article 16 protects marriage and family. Product review does not engage with marriage or family rights. No observable signal.

Article 17 protects property rights. Review mentions product cost (£40 second-hand) and availability, but does not advocate for or against property rights. No systematic signal.

Article 18 protects freedom of thought, conscience, religion. Tech review does not engage with conscience or religious freedom. No observable signal.

Article 19 protects freedom of opinion and expression. Author freely expresses detailed technical opinion, corrects own errors transparently via footnotes ('I started writing this 3 days after the reveal. Oops.'), provides balanced critique, and content is freely accessible without registration. Domain context shows editorial integrity norms (+0.1 modifier for editorial code). Mild positive directionality toward expression freedoms. M evidence due to clear but limited scope (product review, not systematic advocacy).

Article 20 protects freedom of assembly and association. Tech review does not address assembly or group association. No observable signal.

Article 21 protects democratic participation and voting. Product review does not engage with democracy or voting rights. No observable signal.

Article 22 protects social security and welfare rights. Tech review does not address social welfare or economic security. No observable signal.

Article 23 protects right to work and fair labor conditions. Product review does not engage with labor rights or working conditions. No observable signal.

Article 24 protects rest and leisure. Tech review does not systematically address rest/leisure rights, although gaming/leisure is contextual subject matter. No explicit signal to Article 24 principles.

Article 25 protects right to adequate living standard, health, and medical care. Review describes accessibility use of Steam Controller for wrist strain relief ('Stuck with my Desktop PC to do everything with, I soon found myself dealing with wrist strain from constantly using my mouse... this controller... have been perfect for the job'). Indicates device accessibility for ergonomic health needs. Domain context shows mild accessibility consideration (+0.05 modifier). L evidence: indirect accessibility signal, not systematic health/living standard advocacy.

Article 26 protects right to education. Review emphasizes Valve's sharable controller layout system allowing users to learn from community templates, developer designs, and community contributions: 'If you're not in the mood to thoroughly set up your controller config, good news: you can borrow someone else's.' This describes knowledge-sharing infrastructure. Domain accessibility consideration (+0.05) applies. L evidence: indirect educational signal via community knowledge-sharing mechanism, not systematic education advocacy.

Article 27 protects participation in cultural life and scientific benefits. Review contextualizes gaming and tech customization as cultural and creative practice ('Weird internet musician who wants to use the trackpad motors as an instrument? Go wild'). Content freely accessible supports cultural participation. Domain context: free access model (+0.1 modifier). L evidence: gaming is cultural context, but review is product-focused rather than systematic cultural participation advocacy.

Article 28 protects establishment of social order for rights realization. Tech review does not address institutional or social order frameworks. No observable signal.

Article 29 describes duties to community. Tech review does not systematically address civic duties or community obligations. No observable signal.

Article 30 prevents rights destruction. Tech review does not engage with destruction of rights or abuse of UDHR. No observable signal.