Article advocates explicitly for democratic survival and resistance to authoritarian consolidation. Editorial framing positions democracy as core human aspiration. Structural access limitations moderate score.

Article emphasizes equal political participation and resistance across social groups; implicit affirmation of equal dignity. Paywall restricts reach.

Case studies (Brazil, South Korea, Poland) emphasize broad-based resistance across class, ideology, and demographic lines. Access barrier noted.

Central thesis: democratic survival depends on recognizing and resisting threats to security and liberty. Article documents cases where recognition prevented authoritarian consolidation.

No direct discussion of slavery or servitude. Minimal relevance.

Oblique reference to torture (Brazilian dictatorship history); no direct treatment of torture prohibition.

Implicit: democratic systems recognize citizens as agents; authoritarian systems negate personhood. Limited direct treatment.

Brazilian Supreme Court's aggressive defense of constitutional order exemplifies protection of equal application of law. Paywall limits reach.

Brazilian and Korean court systems provided effective remedies against authoritarian threats; article documents institutional responsiveness.

No discussion of arbitrary arrest or detention procedures.

Article highlights role of independent courts (Brazil's Supreme Court, Korean legislature) in fair adjudication of political crises.

No discussion of criminal procedure or presumption of innocence in primary text.

No direct treatment of privacy or interference with correspondence.

No substantive discussion of freedom of movement or residence.

Minimal discussion of asylum or refuge; not primary focus.

Case studies implicitly affirm state sovereignty and national democratic self-determination; limited direct treatment.

No discussion of marriage, family, or family equality.

Implicit: authoritarian consolidation threatens economic security; not explicitly addressed.

Bolsonaro's attacks on LGBTQ+ acceptance hint at conscience suppression; minimal explicit treatment.

Article emphasizes role of press coverage and civil discourse in recognizing and resisting authoritarian threats. Vox's own publication of this investigative work exemplifies Article 19 defense.

Article documents 40,000+ protests in US, mass mobilization in Brazil and South Korea, and citizens physically blocking military vehicles. Central to resilience narrative.

Central argument: democratic participation and electoral processes are both rights and mechanisms for defeating authoritarians. Multiple case studies highlight election outcomes.

Implicit: authoritarian regimes threaten economic security and social services. Limited explicit treatment of economic and social rights.

Tesla Takedown movement mentioned as form of resistance; minimal direct treatment of labor rights.

No substantive discussion of rest, leisure, or reasonable working hours.

Implicit: authoritarian regimes undermine standard of living. Limited direct treatment.

Article notes 'civic awareness' as factor in Korean resilience; researcher cited from academic institutions. Education's role in democracy implied.

Minimal discussion of cultural participation; not primary focus.

Article emphasizes comparative study of democracies and international community response as protective factors; implies need for global democratic order.

Emphasis on citizen mobilization and institutional actors' responsibilities to defend democracy; rights-responsibility balance implicit.

Central thesis: authoritarian projects aim to dismantle democratic protections; resistance preserves universal rights framework. Directly addresses preventing rights destruction.