Cookie consent system present with personalization tracking and targeted ads mentioned; consent collection observed but implementation opaque.
Terms of Service
—
Terms of service not directly observable on page content.
Accessibility
+0.05
Article 25
Screen reader text CSS present and ad-blocking disabled message indicates structural accessibility consideration.
Mission
—
No explicit mission statement observable on this page.
Editorial Code
+0.05
Article 19
Professional news organization with byline attribution and publication/modification dates documented.
Ownership
—
Yomiuri Shimbun ownership apparent from domain but no explicit statement on page.
Access Model
+0.10
Article 19
Article marked as free ('isAccessibleForFree: true' in schema); no paywall detected on content provided.
Ad/Tracking
-0.10
Article 12
Multiple tracking systems observed: Google Tag Manager, Cxense consent/tracking, ad network (GAM), behavioral personalization. Ad blocking detection present.
I have very fond memories of Kansai airport. First time I went to Japan I ... Uhh, I didn't have a visa despite going there for exchange.
The Kansai airport immigration office uttered a lot of "oohs" and "eehs", but they came through and in less than 45 minutes my appeal for deportation was accepted and I was granted a 1 year student visa. Always makes me happy when I pass through there :)
Headline's a bit misleading. They've never permanently lost a bag, and well done to them for that, but they've certainly lost them for periods of time. Just eventually found them.
I once flew with ANA to Tokyo/Haneda in First with a rewards-paid ticket for crazy cheap. When I got there and picked up my luggage there was a tag on it, asking me to go to some specific desk. I did. The luggage was a bit janky, but that happens.
They very seriously apologized for breaking my bag. They asked me how much it had cost. I said "around $40, it was just something cheap". A minute later I was sort of ceremoniously handed an envelope with japanese yen notes worth that much.
> In early December, a 35-year-old passenger from Tanzania was impressed to see that all the handles of the suitcases on the conveyor belt in the baggage claim area were facing the passengers.
> After the luggage is unloaded and collected in the cargo handling area upon arrival at the airport, ground support personnel manually align the handles of the bags and place them on the conveyor belt.
That's a level of attention to detail that we should be striving for in everything we build.
When traveling to Japan, I did not have the slightest problem with lost baggage, either at airports, or with the Japanese services that allow you to send your baggage from one hotel to another, to be able to travel more lightly.
However, at the airport, when flying back home I had an unexpected experience. At my final destination, when I retrieved my checked baggage in the airport, it no longer had the padlock that it had at check in, in Japan.
I assume that this happened because at the airport, after check in, they have cut the padlock, to inspect the baggage. I also assume that the inspection was caused by a big kitchen knife that was in the baggage. The kitchen knife had been bought from a shop from Osaka, and it was well sealed inside the original package closed by the shop, but this would not be seen at an X-ray machine.
There was nothing else in the baggage that could be suspicious. In any case, if they inspected the baggage to check the knife, it was done carefully, and the content of the baggage was in the exact same positions as after packing.
Applying cost-cutting analysis as an intellectual exercise...
Airline ticket sales are so price driven that for much of the market, losing some percentage of bags won't change purchase decisions.
I wonder if it's possible to identify which bags are from budget customers and for Kansai Airport to cut corners for those, accepting a certain loss percentage and saving money. It may not be:
> In addition to monitoring bags with sensors, employees also patrol the area to check for dropped bags. According to the airport management company, this additional step significantly reduces the risk of lost baggage.
I think you either patrol for all dropped bags or give up the patrols entirely, assuming that bags from first-class and budget passengers end up in the same area.
Visited Kansai recently and a few things stood out. Passport control was fully automated: just scanned and walked through. Security flagged something in my bag and resolved it really fast without slowing down the line. It's a small thing, but it's the kind of operational detail that makes a real difference. My travel experience has never been smoother. Makes me wonder why more airports don't get this right.
Yes it all comes to the culture. But we need to take into account that Japanese culture for the workers themselves is absolutely horrible. Is all that suffering worth not losing a bunch of luggage or getting a train exactly the minute you expect? Not for me at least. I think it’s better to cope with imperfections like that than to work in a toxic environment where you can’t leave the office until your boss leaves.
That same culture is the reason why we don’t hear about successful startups from Japan. God forbid there is a single bug in it. But what’s better - to have a software with a bug and not the cleanest code or not to have it at all? Hardware is another story of course. But my point is that there is both good and bad in any culture. Depends on how you look at it
Medium F: General news coverage affirms dignity and equal worth through factual reporting
Editorial
+0.20
Structural
+0.15
SETL
+0.10
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Editorial voice neutral and factual; structural access open via free schema. No explicit engagement with human dignity framing.
ND
Article 1Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood
Article 1 (equal rights and dignity) not directly addressed in airport baggage service feature.
ND
Article 2Non-Discrimination
No observable non-discrimination markers in baggage service story.
ND
Article 3Life, Liberty, Security
Right to life, liberty and security not thematic to airport operations reporting.
ND
Article 4No Slavery
Slavery prohibition not relevant to content.
ND
Article 5No Torture
Torture and cruel treatment prohibition not addressed.
ND
Article 6Legal Personhood
Right to recognition as person not implicated.
ND
Article 7Equality Before Law
Equal protection before law not directly observable.
ND
Article 8Right to Remedy
Remedy for rights violations not addressed in airport service feature.
ND
Article 9No Arbitrary Detention
Arbitrary arrest/detention not relevant to content.
ND
Article 10Fair Hearing
Fair trial rights not implicated.
ND
Article 11Presumption of Innocence
Criminal law presumption not addressed.
-0.34
Article 12Privacy
High P: Cxense tracking and Google Tag Manager behavioral profiling without granular opt-in P: Ad blocking detection and enforcement mechanisms P: Multiple personalization systems linked to cookies
Editorial
-0.15
Structural
-0.25
SETL
+0.16
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Strong structural privacy concerns: multiple tracking systems (GTM, Cxense, GAM), behavioral personalization, ad-blocker enforcement. DCP modifiers applied for tracking opacity and consent collection mechanism. Privacy protections below UDHR baseline.
+0.30
Article 13Freedom of Movement
Medium P: Free, open access to content via isAccessibleForFree:true schema
Editorial
ND
Structural
+0.30
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Content freely accessible without subscription barrier; mild positive for freedom of movement/access to information.
ND
Article 14Asylum
Right to asylum not addressed in travel/airport context.
ND
Article 15Nationality
Nationality rights not implicated.
ND
Article 16Marriage & Family
Marriage and family rights not addressed.
ND
Article 17Property
Property rights not relevant to baggage service story.
ND
Article 18Freedom of Thought
Freedom of thought, conscience, religion not implicated.
+0.53
Article 19Freedom of Expression
High A: Professional journalism with byline attribution (author: Eiji Uematsu) F: Factual, neutral reporting on airport operations P: Free access via isAccessibleForFree:true; no paywall P: Publication and modification dates documented
Editorial
+0.40
Structural
+0.35
SETL
+0.14
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Strong editorial signals for freedom of expression/information: professional attribution, transparent dating, free access. DCP modifiers for editorial code (+0.05) and access model (+0.1) applied to support moderate-positive score. Journalism quality supports Article 19.
ND
Article 20Assembly & Association
Freedom of assembly not addressed.
ND
Article 21Political Participation
Participation in government not relevant to airport feature.
ND
Article 22Social Security
Social security and cultural rights not addressed.
ND
Article 23Work & Equal Pay
Right to work/employment not thematic.
ND
Article 24Rest & Leisure
Right to rest and leisure not addressed.
+0.25
Article 25Standard of Living
Medium P: Screen reader CSS and accessibility text present in code
Editorial
ND
Structural
+0.20
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Structural accessibility measures observable (screen-reader-text CSS). DCP modifier for accessibility (+0.05) applied. Mild positive for disabled access provisions.
ND
Article 26Education
Right to education not addressed.
+0.25
Article 27Cultural Participation
Low A: Airport operations and service innovation exemplify participation in cultural/technical advancement
Editorial
+0.25
Structural
ND
SETL
ND
Combined
ND
Context Modifier
ND
Light positive: airport baggage system represents technical/operational participation in modern infrastructure; modest implication for cultural/scientific advancement.