Preamble addresses human dignity and rights. YouTube's technical infrastructure shows surveillance-oriented design (WIZ telemetry, ytcsi monitoring, extensive experiment logging). No affirmative dignity signals in observable structure.

Article 1 addresses equality and inherent rights. Video watch page structure does not directly instantiate or contradict equality principles. Neutral default.

Article 2 addresses non-discrimination. YouTube's recommendation algorithms are opaque. Experiment flags suggest algorithmic filtering by various parameters. No observable anti-discrimination measures.

Article 3 addresses right to life, liberty, security. Not directly relevant to video platform technical infrastructure observable here.

Article 4 addresses slavery. Not directly observable in video platform page structure.

Article 5 addresses torture and inhuman treatment. Not directly observable in video platform infrastructure.

Article 6 addresses right to recognition as person before law. Not directly relevant to video platform structure.

Article 7 addresses equality before law and equal protection. Not directly observable in page source.

Article 8 addresses right to effective remedy. Not directly observable in video watch page structure.

Article 9 addresses arbitrary arrest and detention. Not applicable to video platform.

Article 10 addresses right to fair and public hearing. Not directly observable in video watch page.

Article 11 addresses presumption of innocence. Not applicable to video platform structure.

Article 12 protects privacy, family, correspondence, honor, reputation. YouTube's observable infrastructure shows pervasive data collection: WIZ_global_data telemetry, ytcsi performance monitoring, extensive experiment flags targeting user behavior analysis, ad tracking. Clear negative signal on privacy protection.

Article 13 addresses freedom of movement and residence. YouTube enables cross-border content access without geographical restriction (observable from watch URL structure). Positive structural signal for information access and borderless communication.

Article 14 addresses right to asylum. Not directly relevant to video platform.

Article 15 addresses right to nationality. Not directly relevant to video platform structure.

Article 16 addresses protection of family and privacy of marriage. YouTube's data collection infrastructure (visible tracking, experiment-based behavioral targeting) could impair family autonomy and personal decision-making. Mild negative signal.

Article 17 protects property rights and protection against arbitrary deprivation. YouTube's data collection and algorithmic profiling could be characterized as appropriation of personal data without meaningful consent mechanisms observable in page source. Moderate negative signal.

Article 18 protects freedom of thought, conscience, religion. YouTube's infrastructure allows diverse content publication and consumption. Structure enables expression diversity (though moderation systems not visible in source). Mild positive signal.

Article 19 protects freedom of opinion and expression, receiving and sharing information. YouTube's structural design enables these rights: free content hosting, viewer access without mandatory login, cross-border reach. Observable positive signals for information dissemination and expression. Moderate positive.

Article 20 protects freedom of peaceful assembly and association. YouTube enables comment sections, community features (experiment flags reference 'enable_community_page_on_desktop'), and collective viewership. Structure supports online association and collective action. Mild positive.

Article 21 addresses right to participation in government and public affairs. YouTube enables access to political information and civic content. Structural support for democratic participation through information access. Mild positive.

Article 22 addresses right to social security. Not directly relevant to video platform structure.

Article 23 addresses right to work and fair working conditions. Not directly observable in video watch page structure.

Article 24 addresses right to rest and leisure. Not directly relevant to video platform infrastructure.

Article 25 addresses right to adequate standard of living and health. YouTube's accessible design (responsive, keyboard navigation, accessibility flags in experiment settings) supports health-promoting access to information. Mild positive.

Article 26 addresses right to education. YouTube's structure enables access to educational content globally and freely. Observable support for educational access. Mild positive.

Article 27 addresses participation in cultural life and protection of artistic/scientific interests. YouTube's infrastructure enables creators to publish artistic and creative content globally, and audiences to access cultural material. Clear structural support for cultural rights. Mild positive.

Article 28 addresses right to social and international order to realize rights. YouTube is privately controlled; structural governance mechanisms do not include public democratic accountability. Mild negative signal regarding collective establishment of social/international framework.

Article 29 addresses duties to community and limits on rights for public order/morals. YouTube employs content moderation and algorithmic filtering (observable through experiment flags), which restricts expression in service of community standards. Mild negative signal regarding unrestricted expression.

Article 30 addresses protection of UDHR from destruction. YouTube's extensive data collection and tracking infrastructure could theoretically enable surveillance-based rights violations. Mild negative signal regarding structural protection of UDHR itself.