Editorial signal: Article framed as government accountability action protecting public interest through tax enforcement (pro-UDHR framing). Structural signal: Paywall access restriction and tracking infrastructure counterbalance pro-rights editorial lens.

Editorial: Coverage treats corporate tax avoidance as public equality issue; implies unequal burden. Structural: Access restriction creates information inequality.

Editorial: Story implies discriminatory tax enforcement (larger firms exploit loopholes). Structural: Commercial interests and ownership structure may create systemic bias in coverage of corporate actors.

Minimal editorial/structural signal; topic (tax law interpretation) tangential to right to life.

Minimal relevance; tax enforcement is regulatory, not slavery/forced-labor context.

Not directly relevant; no torture/cruel treatment content.

Tangential; right to recognition before law not primary concern.

Editorial: Story argues for equal legal treatment and equal tax enforcement (all corporations subject to same scrutiny). Structural: Subscription model creates unequal information access; domain tracking may enable differential treatment.

Editorial: Reports on IRS seeking legal remedy (refund of $16B); implies institutional mechanisms for rights enforcement. Structural: Neutral on this dimension.

Editorial: Story depicts corporate tax strategies as subject to enforcement; could frame as restriction on corporate liberty. Structural: Access restriction limits reader freedom.

Minimal signal; tax dispute procedure not directly comparable to fair trial guarantees.

Editorial: IRS assertion of $16B obligation (presumption of corporate wrongdoing); implies accountability mechanism. Structural: Paywall access restriction undermines public right to information about legal status.

Editorial: Neutral on privacy. Structural: Extensive tracking infrastructure (Sentry, Datadog RUM, Facebook pixels, analytics) directly violates privacy expectations; user behavioral data collected and potentially shared without explicit consent visibility in HTML.

Editorial: Story reports on policy/government action with no residency restrictions on reading. Structural: Metered paywall restricts movement through information ecosystem; subscription requirement creates barriers.

Not relevant; no asylum/refuge content in tax enforcement story.

Minimal relevance; nationality not addressed.

Minimal relevance; family/marriage not addressed.

Editorial: Story frames tax collection as protection of public property/interest (revenue accountability). Structural: Paywall restricts information access about tax/property issues.

Editorial: Independent reporting on government vs. corporate interests; no apparent editorial suppression. Domain: Published ethical standards reinforce editorial independence.

Editorial: Strong pro-Article 19 signal—investigative reporting on government accountability, corporate tax avoidance, public interest information. Structural: Metered paywall (isAccessibleForFree:false) significantly restricts freedom to receive information; commercial access model undermines universal information access. Domain: Published ethical journalism standards support editorial freedom.

Minimal direct coverage; tax policy story enables informed civic participation indirectly.

Editorial: Story reports on democratic government action (IRS enforcement); implies participatory governance. Structural: Paywall restricts participation by limiting information access.

Editorial: Tax enforcement story relates to public resource allocation for social programs (tax revenue funds welfare). Structural: Paywall creates access inequality.

Minimal relevance; labor rights not addressed in tax enforcement story.

Minimal relevance; rest/leisure not addressed.

Editorial: Tax enforcement story implies public resource protection for standard-of-living programs. Structural: Access restriction limits engagement.

Editorial: Story provides public information relevant to economic/civic education. Structural: Paywall restricts educational access; accessibility features (skip links, semantic HTML) partially mitigate. Domain: Accessibility infrastructure supports Article 26.

Editorial: Journalistic reporting on public policy enables cultural/civic participation. Structural: Paywall restricts participation; domain accessibility features partially support engagement. Skip-to-content and semantic HTML improve access for users with disabilities.

Editorial: Story reports on legal/institutional framework for tax enforcement; implies functional legal order. Structural: Neutral.

Editorial: Minimal signal on duties. Structural: Paywall represents restriction on exercise of UDHR rights; commercial interest may conflict with universal access principle.

Editorial: Neutral. Structural: Paywall and commercial tracking infrastructure represent potential misuse of UDHR framework for commercial rather than rights-protection purposes.