Preamble content framing human dignity and fundamental freedoms. Article frames regulatory action protecting children from harm online (dignity, protection of vulnerable groups)

Implicit endorsement of equal rights principle through coverage of data protection enforcement

No direct discrimination coverage; article focuses on corporate compliance

Right to life not directly addressed; reporting on data protection enforcement is tangential

Slavery and servitude not relevant to article scope

Torture/inhuman treatment not addressed; data protection enforcement is protective mechanism but not directly relevant

Right to recognition before law: Article reports on regulatory action (ICO enforcement), establishing legal personhood and corporate accountability

Equal protection before law: Article frames regulatory fine as equal enforcement mechanism against tech corporation

Right to remedy: Core article focus is on regulatory remedy (£14m fine) for privacy violations; explicitly advocates for data protection enforcement

Arbitrary detention not relevant; article reports on lawful regulatory action

Right to fair trial: Article reports on regulatory process but not a judicial trial; limited direct relevance

Presumption of innocence and criminal liability not directly addressed

Right to privacy: Core article focus; explicitly covers Reddit's failures in age verification, exposing children to harmful material; regulatory action frames privacy protection as enforcement mechanism

Freedom of movement not directly addressed; article respects access to information without gating

Right to asylum not relevant to article scope

Nationality rights not addressed

Marriage and family not directly relevant

Right to property: Article implies corporate accountability framework; regulatory fine is lawful property restriction

Freedom of conscience and religion not addressed

Freedom of expression and information: Article is itself expression of news; reports regulatory action without censoring corporate voice; open access to information; editorial independence observable

Freedom of peaceful assembly and association not directly addressed

Right to participate in government not relevant to article scope

Social security: Limited relevance; article reports on regulatory enforcement mechanism

Right to work not directly addressed

Right to rest and leisure not relevant

Right to adequate standard of living: Article frames child safety and protection from harmful material as component of adequate living conditions; regulatory enforcement protects vulnerable group (minors)

Right to education: Implied protection mechanism; safe online environment supports access to information for education

Cultural rights not directly addressed

Social and international order: Article frames regulatory enforcement within UK legal framework; implies protective social order

Duties and responsibilities: Limited coverage; article reports enforcement but not community responsibilities

Prohibition of destruction of rights not directly addressed