Article presents multilateral diplomatic framework and human rights discourse (JCPOA context includes non-proliferation treaty respecting international order). Coverage acknowledges diverse stakeholder perspectives, supporting human dignity and justice themes.

Article discusses sovereign equality of nations (US, signatories, Iran) in treaty negotiation and withdrawal context. Open editorial presentation supports principle of universal human equality in international relations.

Wikipedia's non-discriminatory access and multilingual support structurally support nondiscrimination. Editorial coverage treats all parties neutrally regardless of nationality or ideology.

No direct observable content on right to life, liberty, security. Structural: neutral site infrastructure.

No observable content on slavery or servitude within article scope.

No observable content on torture or cruel treatment within article scope.

No observable content on right to recognition as person before law within article scope.

Article discusses international legal framework and treaty equality among signatories, implicitly supporting equal protection before law in diplomatic context. Limited direct evidence.

Minimal observable content on right to remedy. Article covers policy and diplomatic consequences but not individual legal recourse or remedial mechanisms.

No observable content on arbitrary arrest or detention within article scope.

No observable content on fair trial or judicial impartiality within article scope.

No observable content on presumption of innocence or criminal procedure within article scope.

Wikipedia's privacy protections for anonymous users marginally support right to privacy. Limited editorial content on privacy within JCPOA/withdrawal context.

Free and open access to information about international policy supports freedom of movement and opinion. Wikipedia's global accessibility structure enables cross-border information flow.

Article covers asylum and refuge implications indirectly through diplomatic consequences and sanctions discussion. Limited direct content on right to asylum; framing acknowledges international humanitarian context.

Article discusses nationality and international relations broadly. Limited direct content on right to nationality; treats nation-states as primary actors with equal sovereignty.

No observable content on marriage, family rights, or consent within article scope.

No observable content on property rights within article scope.

Minimal content on freedom of conscience and religion. JCPOA is secular treaty; Wikipedia's neutral presentation does not suppress religious perspectives on policy.

Strong alignment. Article presents comprehensive, multisource coverage of controversial geopolitical decision. Wikipedia's editorial NPOV policy, open-source model, and free access directly instantiate freedom of opinion and expression. Structural and editorial channels both positive.

Article documents international assembly (JCPOA signatories) and peaceful association. Coverage acknowledges opposition to withdrawal as form of collective expression. No suppression of association evident.

Article covers public participation in policy (reactions, diplomatic processes, stakeholder positions). Wikipedia presentation enables informed participation in democratic discourse about US foreign policy.

Article discusses international cooperation and social security through JCPOA's framework. Coverage implies interdependence and collective benefit; sanctions discussion addresses economic security implications.

Limited observable content on work and employment. Sanctions implications for economic activity mentioned tangentially; not primary article focus.

No observable content on rest, leisure, or reasonable working hours within article scope.

Minimal content on standard of living, food, clothing, health. Sanctions discussion touches on economic welfare; limited direct observable content on social security provisions.

Strong alignment. Wikipedia's free-access, nondiscriminatory educational model directly supports right to education. Article provides factual information enabling public understanding of international policy without bias based on geography or income.

Article documents participation in cultural/intellectual heritage of international diplomacy and scientific governance (non-proliferation). Wikipedia platform facilitates participation in global information commons supporting scientific and cultural advancement.

Limited observable content on social order enabling UDHR rights. Article documents disruption of international order through unilateral withdrawal; framing suggests preference for multilateral frameworks supporting rights realization.

Minimal observable content on duties to community. Article is descriptive of policy event; no explicit normative framing around community responsibilities or limitations on rights for collective benefit.

Limited content on prevention of destruction of UDHR rights. Article documents policy that critics argue undermines non-proliferation and stability frameworks; neutral presentation does not attribute destruction of rights to withdrawal per se.