Structural signals reflect pervasive data collection (tracking scripts, ad tagging, experiment flags) that undermines dignity and free will in accessing information. Negative modifier applied for privacy-invasive architecture at platform level.

Structural: Platform provides access regardless of apparent identity, but tracking infrastructure (EventID, CSN logging) enables surveillance that may constrain equal dignity in practice.

Structural: Accessibility polyfills and webcomponents suggest non-discriminatory technical design. Positive modifier for accessibility infrastructure. However, tracking practices may create practical barriers for privacy-conscious users.

Observable on-page evidence insufficient to assess security of video hosting and distribution infrastructure.

Structural: Behavioral tracking (experiment flags, gel logging) can enable profiling and micromanagement. Absence of transparent slavery/servitude safeguards observable in ad-targeting config.

Structural: No explicit torture/cruel treatment signals. However, behavioral manipulation through engagement metrics and recommendation algorithms (not directly visible in HTML but inferred from experiment flags) may constitute degrading treatment.

Article 6 (legal personhood) not observable at page level.

Equal protection before law not evaluable from video player page.

Remedy for violations not observable from page structure.

Structural: Extensive arbitrary detention-analogue through data collection without explicit consent. CONFIG shows 'ad_tracking', 'compress_gel', 'networkless_logging', 'gel_log_commands' indicating systemic data capture. Tracking config creates arbitrary constraints on user autonomy.

Fair and public hearing rights not evaluable from video player page.

Criminal law presumptions not observable.

Structural: Pervasive privacy invasion. Config includes 'attmusi', 'att_' prefixed flags, EVENT_ID, CSN logging, origin-trial Privacy Sandbox implementation. Third-party ad tracking enabled by default. Arbitrary interference with privacy through behavioral targeting, event logging, and ad profiling without explicit granular consent.

Structural: Global video platform provides freedom of movement to access content from worldwide creators. No geofencing observed in base page structure. Positive signal for freedom of movement within information ecosystem.

Structural: Platform allows asylum-seekers and refugees to access content and upload. No apparent exclusions based on national origin visible in tech stack. Sign-out access available per standard YouTube.

Nationality rights not evaluable from video page.

Structural: Age-gating and account-based features restrict children's privacy protection. Tracking applies to minors without sufficient parental consent mechanisms visible. Platform collects data on minors without transparently protected consent.

Structural: Extensive property-like exploitation of user data and attention. Behavioral tracking (experiment flags, gel logging, ad tracking) captures and monetizes user activity without explicit property protections. CONFIG reveals 'enable_att_for_transcript_request_on_web_client', 'enable_client_streamz_web', indicating systematic data appropriation.

Structural: Platform permits diverse creator voices and content creation. No apparent restrictions on conscience/religion visible. However, algorithmic curation (not visible in HTML) may constrain effective expression.

Structural: Platform facilitates freedom of opinion and expression globally (positive). However, opaque content moderation, algorithmic suppression (experimentation flags suggest A/B testing of visibility), and tracking-based manipulation undermine true freedom of expression. Modifier applied for editorial opacity.

Structural: Platform permits assembly and association through live chat, community posts, and comments (visible in HTML references to 'live_chat_' features). No apparent prohibition on peaceful association visible.

Structural: Platform facilitates participation in governance of content through reporting, moderation participation. However, algorithmic control by platform limits democratic participation in actual content governance.

Structural: Platform enables social benefits (entertainment, education, community) but creates digital divide exclusion. Tracking infrastructure and ad-targeting may disadvantage users without privacy-bypassing means. Data collection for monetization limits social security equity.

Structural: Platform enables creator work and compensation through monetization. However, algorithmic control and unfair terms (not visible in HTML) may undermine fair work conditions for creators.

Rest and leisure rights not evaluable from video page.

Structural: Free video access provides standard of living improvement through education and information. No paywall for viewing videos. Positive modifier for universal access infrastructure. Platform enables healthcare, educational, and subsistence knowledge sharing globally.

Structural: Platform enables universal education through video content. Accessibility infrastructure (webcomponents, polyfills) support diverse learners. Captions and transcripts available on platform. Free education access globally. Positive modifier for education enablement.

Structural: Platform enables cultural participation and scientific sharing. However, copyright enforcement and DMCA compliance limit some cultural commons. Slight negative for IP restrictions.

Structural: Platform architecture violates social order necessary for rights realization through pervasive surveillance (tracking, ad profiling, behavioral logging). Systematic data extraction undermines foundation of rights-respecting social order.

Structural: Platform imposes restrictions on freedoms through Terms of Service (not fully visible), community guidelines enforcement, and algorithmic suppression. Data collection and targeting restrict freedoms under guise of personalization. Modifier applied for systemic freedom restriction.

Prevention of UDHR rights destruction not evaluable from page-level data.