Title and meta description assert advocacy for farmers' 'rights' against corporate control. Frames repair as a fundamental interest. Editorial positioning strongly affirms human dignity and equality themes from Preamble. Structural accessibility supports universal participation. Domain mission aligns with Preamble's intent.

Content advocates for farmers as rights-bearing agents ('retake their rights'). Frames repair access as prerequisite for equal participation. Editorial emphasis on collective action supports equality principle. Structural openness to commentary and discussion supports equal voice, though tracking asymmetry undermines parity.

Repair access framed as essential entitlement without discrimination. Advocacy implies non-discriminatory principle—equipment ownership and repair rights should not depend on corporate affiliation. Structural tracking applies uniformly to all users (non-discriminatory in application but creates information asymmetry).

Right to life not directly addressed in content. Repair rights have tangential connection to survival/sustenance (agricultural livelihood), but content is not primarily about life/safety. Structural support for user agency and participation is weak but present.

Slavery/servitude not addressed or referenced.

Torture/cruel treatment not discussed.

Right to recognition as person is implicit in advocacy for farmers as agents with 'rights.' Repair ownership requires legal personhood and standing. Structural openness to user participation (comments, discussion) recognizes individual agency. Not directly about legal personality but supports foundational concept.

Equal protection under law is core editorial claim: farmers should have equal right to repair equipment they own, regardless of manufacturer restrictions. Frames manufacturer control as illegal discrimination. Editorial strongly advocates equality before law. Structural tracking creates transparency gap that undermines equal protection of user privacy.

Right to remedy is implicit: farmers unable to repair own equipment are denied remedy for equipment failure. Editorial advocates for legal/procedural remedy to repair restrictions. iFixit itself functions as remedy provider (guides, community). Structural support is weak—site offers remedy through content but tracking does not enhance legal recourse.

Arbitrary arrest/detention not addressed.

Fair and public hearing principle implied by advocacy for transparent dispute resolution (farmers vs. John Deere). Editorial frames manufacturer restrictions as unfair legal barrier. Structural openness to comments suggests commitment to hearing multiple perspectives, though not a formal adjudication mechanism.

Criminal guilt/presumption of innocence not addressed.

Article 12 protects against arbitrary interference with privacy. Content itself does not violate this. However, structural infrastructure creates significant privacy risk: multiple trackers (Google Analytics, GTM, ActiveCampaign, Piwik), ad personalization enabled, user data profiling (customer type, store, language preferences). Consent-based but permissive default. Domain-wide tracking modifier (-0.15) and ad_tracking modifier (-0.15) both apply here. Direct conflict: editorial advocates user rights while structure enables surveillance capitalism.

Freedom of movement and residence: repair access enables farmers to remain on/operate their land independently. Editorial frames repair restrictions as constraint on livelihood and land use. Structural openness to information access supports freedom. Public article accessible to all supports right to seek/share information.

Asylum/refuge rights not directly addressed. However, broader principle of seeking safety/protection from harm is implied: farmers need repair rights to protect livelihoods from corporate control. Structural accessibility supports safe access to information without barriers.

Nationality rights not addressed.

Family/marriage rights not directly addressed. Tangential connection: repair independence relates to economic security that supports family stability. Editorial frames repair as essential to family livelihood (farmers' families depend on equipment function). Structural support minimal.

Property rights: core argument of piece. 'Farmers...pushing hard to retake their rights' directly references ownership rights over equipment they purchased. Editorial advocates property rights against manufacturer restriction (right to repair/modify own property). Structural: iFixit itself is a property-rights enabler (guides, parts, knowledge sharing). Domain mission explicitly centered on property/ownership rights. This is the article's strongest alignment point.

Freedom of thought, conscience, religion: editorial advocates for intellectual freedom in repair (right to understand/modify own equipment). Farmer agency and autonomy are framed as essential. Structural openness to diverse viewpoints (comments, discussion) supports conscience. Not primarily about belief but about freedom to act on one's understanding.

Freedom of opinion and expression: article itself exercises this right by publishing advocacy journalism. Editorial advocates for information freedom (farmers should have access to repair manuals, parts information). Structural: article is publicly accessible without registration; comments enabled (though not fully visible in provided HTML). Domain mission centers on sharing repair knowledge freely. However, tracking infrastructure (-0.15 modifier) creates chilling effect on expression privacy.

Freedom of peaceful assembly/association: editorial specifically highlights farmer collective action ('Iowa farmers...pushing hard'). Frames coordinated action as rights-assertion mechanism. Structural: iFixit community features enable association (guides, comments, user networks). Domain supports repair communities/mutual aid. Strong alignment with Article 20 principles.

Participation in governance: editorial frames farmers' repair fight as participation in democratic process (advocating for legal change). Structural: iFixit community participation is limited (no voting or governance voting visible), but article enables informed citizenry. Domain contributes to public discourse.

Social security rights: repair access directly enables livelihood/economic security for farmers. Editorial frames repair as essential to economic survival ('pushing to retake their rights' = reclaim economic independence). Structural support is indirect—knowledge sharing contributes to economic resilience.

Right to work/just conditions: repair rights directly enable farmers' ability to work their land and maintain livelihoods. Editorial frames manufacturer restrictions as interference with work capacity. Structural: iFixit enables workers (farmers, technicians) to perform repairs independently, reducing dependence and improving working conditions.

Rest/leisure rights: not directly addressed. Tangential: repair independence may reduce stress/emergency pressure (can repair on own schedule). Minimal alignment.

Adequate standard of living: repair access is directly tied to sustenance/food security (farmers depend on equipment to farm). Editorial frames repair as prerequisite for economic security. Structural: accessibility features and open knowledge sharing support inclusive access to repair capability.

Education/cultural participation: article itself is educational content. Editorial advocates for knowledge access (repair manuals, technical information). iFixit's mission centers on knowledge democratization. Structural: repair guides are form of education; community enables peer learning. Domain directly supports Article 26.

Participation in cultural/scientific advancement: repair culture is form of technological participation. Editorial frames repair as right to engage with technology one owns. Structural: iFixit is crowdsourced knowledge repository (collective scientific endeavor). Domain mission explicitly centers on democratizing technical/scientific knowledge. Strong alignment.

Social/international order: editorial advocates for legal/systemic change (right to repair legislation). Frames farmers' action as part of broader social movement. Structural: open access to content supports international information sharing. However, structural privacy gaps undermine ideal of trustworthy order.

Duties/community responsibilities: editorial frames repair advocacy as collective responsibility (farmers organizing together). Implies duty to defend shared rights. Structural support is weak—tracking infrastructure suggests individual rather than community focus.

Prevention of UDHR destruction: editorial explicitly advocates against manufacturer monopoly power (John Deere restrictions). Frames repair rights as essential protection against corporate overreach. Structural: iFixit itself functions as bulwark against monopolistic control of repair knowledge. Domain mission directly aligns with Article 30 protective principle.